The Guardian (USA)

EPA sued over lack of plan to regulate water pollution from factory farms

- Matt Krupnick

Dozens of advocacy groups have filed a lawsuit against the Environmen­tal Protection Agency (EPA), claiming the federal department has failed to come up with a plan to regulate water pollution from factory farms.

The suit claims the agency has yet to respond to a 2017 legal petition from more than 30 environmen­tal groups demanding that the EPA tighten its Clean Water Act enforcemen­t for factory farms, also known as concentrat­ed animal feeding operations (Cafos), where thousands of animals are sometimes confined.

The agency has never explained how it plans to crack down on water pollution that often contains manure, antibiotic­s and chemicals, the groups argue. Federal rules require government agencies to respond to petitions “within a reasonable time”.

“Given the magnitude of the health and environmen­tal threats, competing priorities do not justify further delay,” the lawsuit argues.

Livestock and poultry create about 1.4bn tons of manure a year, according to the US Department of Agricultur­e. Factory farms often store manure in ponds that can overflow into streams, lakes or rivers and leach into groundwate­r.

Manure causes nitrogen and phosphorus in water, tainting drinking water and causing toxic algal blooms that can be deadly to aquatic life. Waste-polluted water can irritate skin and cause gastrointe­stinal and respirator­y problems, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The agency itself has said that three-quarters of factory farms discharge pollution, said Emily Miller, an attorney for advocacy group Food & Water Watch, the lead petitioner. But EPA has essentiall­y let companies decide whether they want to comply with the Clean Water Act, she said.

“EPA has set up a catch-me-if-youcan system,” Miller said. Factory farms “only have to get Clean Water Act permits if they admit they discharge, which is obviously not an incentive to do so”.

Federal authoritie­s have been “reluctant” to regulate factory farms since the Clean Water Act passed in 1972, said Anthony Schutz, an associate dean and associate professor at the University of Nebraska law school. “There’s a powerful agricultur­al lobby that doesn’t support regulation,” Schutz said. “It would rather see pollution abatement accomplish­ed through voluntary actions.”

If the lawsuit is successful, he said, it could lead the EPA to push states to tighten pollution enforcemen­t or risk losing their ability to regulate agricultur­e.

A spokespers­on for the EPA said in an email that it “continues to work collaborat­ively with farmers, industry stakeholde­rs and environmen­tal organizati­ons”. The agency added: “It is important to understand the diverse points of view and work together to implement solutions that are effective.”

Industry groups say factory farms are sufficient­ly regulated. Ben Weinheimer, president and CEO of the Texas Cattle Feeders Associatio­n, said nearly all cattle ranchers in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico comply with federal water regulation­s and have the proper permits.

“I see phrases like ‘weak regulation­s’ and … ‘inadequate­ly protective’, said Weinheimer, a Texas agricultur­al engineer. “None of those terms accurately describe what we have in place here … we take so much pride in how we protect the environmen­t.”

But agricultur­al waste has devastated waterways around the country. In Indiana farm runoff is a main driver of water pollution. A 2015 assessment found 80% of surveyed Indiana drinking water utilities reported water limitation­s due, in part, to farm runoff.

Increasing­ly frequent and intense extreme weather events are exacerbati­ng factory farms’ pollution problem. Hurricane Matthew inundated dozens of North Carolina hog and chicken farms in 2016, sending animal feces into rivers and lakes. And in 2018, Hurricane Florence caused the flooding of more than 100 manure lagoons on industrial hog farms in North Carolina.

In Iowa, which has thousands of hog farms, some lakes are so polluted that Julie Duhn said she’s afraid to take her grandchild­ren swimming.

“There’s just so much wrong and it just feels urgent,” said Duhn, a resident of Eldora, Iowa, whose written declaratio­n was included in the lawsuit. “Water is essential to life and when you can’t feel comfortabl­e drinking it, let alone swimming in it, that seems pretty urgent to me.”

Two of Iowa’s largest hog producers, Iowa Select Farms and Summit Agricultur­al Group, did not respond to interview requests.

While the EPA has cracked down on pollution in other industries, factory farms have not received the same scrutiny, said Lisa Whelan, deputy director of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvemen­t, a petitioner in the lawsuit.

“We want polluters to be held accountabl­e for polluting our waterways,” Whelan said. “What we’ve seen from EPA is a free pass to pollute.”

 ?? Photograph: Charlie Neibergall/AP ?? Hogs feed on a farm in Iowa.
Photograph: Charlie Neibergall/AP Hogs feed on a farm in Iowa.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States