The Guardian (USA)

Jury orders Oscar-winner Paul Haggis to pay additional $2.5m in rape lawsuit

-

Oscar-winning screenwrit­er Paul Haggis was ordered on Monday to pay an additional $2.5m in damages in a rape lawsuit, bringing the total to $10m for a woman who said he sexually assaulted her nearly a decade ago.

While accuser Haleigh Breest’s lawyers called the verdict just, Haggis insisted that he had been falsely accused and was financiall­y ruined by fighting the civil case. He vowed to appeal.

“I can’t live with lies like this. I will die clearing my name,” he said as he left court.

Breest, a publicist who had identified herself publicly in the case, said Haggis raped her and forced her to perform oral sex in his New York apartment on 31 January 2013. He says they had a consensual encounter.

The jury sided with Breest last week, awarding her $7.5m in compensato­ry damages for suffering and decided that she was also due punitive damages.

Jurors returned to court on Monday to hear testimony about Haggis’s finances and decide how much more he’d have to pay.

They got a quick course in movie financing as Haggis was questioned about his earnings on such films as Oscar best picture winners Crash and Million Dollar Baby, and the James Bond flicks Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace.

While explaining the complexiti­es of screenwrit­ing compensati­on, he estimated that throughout his four decades in TV and movies, he’s made as much as $25m, before taxes, agents’ and other representa­tives’ fees, and asset splits with his two ex-wives.

The 69-year-old film-maker said during Monday’s hearing that he’d suffered various financial losses over the years but that Breest’s lawsuit wiped him out. He said his legal bills topped $2.6m, while his career abruptly dried up.

“I’ve spent all the money I have at my disposal. I’ve gutted my pension plan, I’ve lived on loans, in order to pay for this case in a very naive belief in justice,” he said outside court.

Breest’s lawyers questioned Haggis’s claims of being broke.

“Nothing Paul Haggis says can be trusted,” attorney Ilann Maazel said.

After the verdict, he said the jury “did the right thing”. Jurors left court without commenting.

Breest, 36, said she suffered both profession­al and psychologi­cal harm

from what happened after she accepted an invitation for a drink at his apartment following a movie premiere. She declined to comment Monday.

In a statement after the initial verdict on Thursday, she said she appreciate­d “the opportunit­y to seek justice and accountabi­lity in court – and that the jury chose to follow the facts – and believed me”.

She sued for unspecifie­d damages. Haggis wasn’t criminally charged in the matter.

 ?? Photograph: Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images ?? Paul Haggis arrives at New York supreme court for his trial on 19 October 2022.
Photograph: Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images Paul Haggis arrives at New York supreme court for his trial on 19 October 2022.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States