The Guardian (USA)

Arizona voters approve Republican measures to restrict ballot initiative­s

- Rachel Leingang in Phoenix

Two Republican ballot measures that will restrict how citizens can get their own priorities on the ballot in the future were approved by voters in Arizona, while one measure to institute stricter voter ID requiremen­ts failed.

The mixed messages sent by voters on these measures aligned with the state’s increasing­ly purple, swing-state style, where candidates and proposals that win come from both sides of the aisle.

Groups planning to run initiative­s will now need those measures to focus on a single subject. For measures that seek to increase taxes, they will now need to get a 60% supermajor­ity of votes for approval. The tax increase measure passed narrowly, with 50.7% in favor, while the single subject question received 55% of the vote.

“The irony is that, with such a slim majority, just over 30,000 votes, voters gave away their authority to have a simple majority make decisions,” said Stacy Pearson, a spokespers­on for Will of the People Arizona, the campaign against the three initiative-related measures.

A third measure aimed at restrictin­g the citizens’ initiative process by allowing lawmakers to tinker with measures after they passed netted just 36% of voters in favor, failing at the ballot.

The Republican-controlled state legislatur­e, which sent questions to the ballot on eight topics this year, from in-state tuition for undocument­ed students to tax increases to fund rural fire districts.

Progressiv­e policies rarely find an audience at the legislatur­e, so groups have used direct democracy to enact them instead, often at a cost of many millions of dollars while facing an intense, well-funded opposition and lawsuits that seek to throw the measures off the ballot. In recent years, citizens’ initiative­s in Arizona created a higher minimum wage and recreation­al marijuana legalizati­on. This year, two initiative­s from the public passed, one of which will increase disclosure­s of dark money spent on elections and another that limits medical debt.

The new restrictio­ns will be in place for the 2024 election, where abortion rights advocates are eyeing a potential ballot measure to enshrine access to abortion. The initiative­s come after years of restrictio­ns from the legislatur­e that have made the process more costly and difficult.

Groups that run initiative­s fear the new measures will mean even fewer policies can make the ballot and that the new restrictio­ns will not be applied narrowly. Citizens’ initiative­s cannot cost the state money, so they often come with fees or tax structures to fund themselves, which they worry may be construed as a tax measure that needs 60% approval.

As for single subjects, most measures cross various parts of state law to ensure they are enacted completely, so initiative users are not sure how courts will construe how a single-subject rule applies to them.

Running ballot measures will become more expensive, and there will be more avenues for litigation against them, Pearson said. “I think anyone looking at initiative­s in Arizona needs to find clarity on the definition of a tax increase … It just complicate­s what should be a very simple decision for voters,” she said.

The voter ID measure, which had the backing of the Arizona Republican party, narrowly failed, coming in with about 49.6% of the vote. It would have required additional informatio­n from voters on mail-in ballots, including a date of birth and an ID number, and eliminated an option for in-person voters to prove their identity and address using documents like utility bills and bank statements.

Opponents to the measure warned that the additional requiremen­ts could disenfranc­hise voters and expose their personal informatio­n to potential identity theft, while proponents said the voter ID law would make voting by mail, the main way Arizonans vote, more secure.

 ?? A polling place in Phoenix. Photograph: Ross D Franklin/AP ??
A polling place in Phoenix. Photograph: Ross D Franklin/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States