The Guardian (USA)

Democrats ditch Manchin’s ‘dirty deal’ after opposition from climate activists

- Nina Lakhani in New York

A last-ditch effort to force through legislatio­n that would weaken environmen­tal protection­s and fast-track energy projects has failed.

Joe Manchin, the fossil fuel-friendly senator from West Virginia, had attempted to latch the controvers­ial deregulati­on and permitting reforms to a must-pass defense bill – after failing to get his so-called “dirty deal” passed earlier this year.

The proposal to attach his bill to the National Defense Authorizat­ion Act (NDAA), an annual appropriat­ions bill that will be voted on later this week, was reportedly supported by Joe Biden and House leader Nancy Pelosi.

But progressiv­e lawmakers and hundreds of climate, public health and youth groups opposed the move to pass such consequent­ial reforms without proper scrutiny. Manchin’s legislatio­n would weaken environmen­tal safeguards and expedite permits to construct pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastruc­ture while restrictin­g public input and legal challenges.

On Tuesday, more than 750 organizati­ons sent a letter to the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and congressio­nal leadership opposing what they call a “cruel and direct attack on environmen­tal justice communitie­s”. Attaching the “dirty deal” to the NDAA, which would have been one of Pelosi’s final acts as speaker, threatened her legacy and the party’s climate credibilit­y, the groups said.

The deal was ditched – for now at least – amid mounting criticism aimed at the Democratic leadership.

Environmen­tal groups welcomed the news, but warned the fossil fuel industry would not give up.

Ariel Moger, government and political affairs director at Friends of the Earth, said: “Manchin’s efforts to tie his dirty deal to any must-pass legislatio­n he can get his hands on are undemocrat­ic and potentiall­y devastatin­g for the planet. With momentum on the side of frontline communitie­s, the fight will continue until the bill dies at the end of this Congress.”

Jeff Ordower, 350.org’s North America director, said: “Senator Manchin cannot get away with last-ditch efforts to push forward his fossil fuel fast tracking bill. The industry will keep trying these secretive, last minute efforts to push forward dirty deals, so we will continue to be alert and we won’t let up the fight.”

Manchin, who receives more campaign donations from the fossil fuel industry than any other lawmaker, warned of dire consequenc­es for America’s

energy security. He said: “The American people will pay the steepest price for Washington once again failing to put common sense policy ahead of toxic tribal politics. This is why the American people hate politics in Washington.”

Manchin’s bill, described by environmen­talists as a “fossil fuel wishlist”, was first attached as a side deal to Biden’s historic climate bill, the Inflation Reduction Act, but was eventually thwarted after widespread opposition from progressiv­e Democrats and civil society groups. It included limits on legal challenges to new energy projects including the 303-mile Mountain Valley gas pipeline across the Appalachia­n mountains that has been stalled by concerned communitie­s and environmen­tal groups in West Virginia and Virginia.

He and other proponents have said that fast-track permitting is needed for a rapid transition to renewables and in order to modernize the country’s outdated power transmissi­on systems.

But Jeff Merkley, the Democratic senator representi­ng Oregon, said Manchin’s deal was a dirty one, and had nothing to do with renewables. “This [bill] will give a whole lot more impetus to fossil fuels and run over the top of ordinary people raising concerns, that’s why it’s a dirty deal. This is a real travesty in terms of legislativ­e deliberati­on, and in terms of environmen­tal justice.”

On Tuesday, Rashida Tlaib, the Democratic congresswo­man from Michigan, had called on her colleagues to stand up against the fossil fuel industry and the undemocrat­ic manner in which leadership was trying to push through the bill without scrutiny. She said: “It’s outrageous enough that Congress wants to spend another $847bn on our military-industrial complex, the largest annual military budget in history; we cannot allow them to then ram through Manchin’s dirty deal in the process.”

The NDAA is considered a mustpass bill because it authorizes pay increases and compensati­on for harmed troops, as well as establishi­ng the following year’s personnel, arms purchasing and geopolitic­al policies.

Environmen­tal and climate justice groups warned Democrats that frontline communitie­s would not forget and would hold them accountabl­e in 2024 if the deregulati­on bill was pushed through.

“To think that this is happening at the hands of Democrats, and their very last action of power is going to be to hurt our communitie­s and strip our voice is really hurtful. I feel betrayed,” said Maria Lopez Nunez, deputy director of the New Jersey-based Ironbound Community Corporatio­n and member of the White House environmen­tal justice advisory council.

“For any Democrat that’s listening, if you’re playing along to this charade, our community will call you out and we will hold you accountabl­e.”

On Wednesday, Manchin launched yet another bid to garner Republican support for his bill in the Senate, in hope of getting it through as an appendage to the NDAA. It seems likely to fail.

“Nobody wants Manchin’s filthy lump of coal, no matter how many ways he tries to polish it,” said Jean Su, energy justice program director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Speaker Pelosi and Leader Schumer need to see this dirty deal for what it is and leave it as a failed footnote in the 2022 history books.”

 ?? Photograph: Chip Somodevill­a/Getty Images ?? Manchin’s proposed plan would have weakened safeguards and expedited permits to construct pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastruc­ture.
Photograph: Chip Somodevill­a/Getty Images Manchin’s proposed plan would have weakened safeguards and expedited permits to construct pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastruc­ture.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States