The Guardian (USA)

‘Decisions imminent’ in Trump election case, Atlanta district attorney says

- Chris McGreal

An Atlanta district attorney has said “decisions are imminent” on whether to charge Donald Trump with criminal offences over his attempt to to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Georgia.

But a highly anticipate­d hearing on Tuesday remained largely inconclusi­ve after a judge decided not to immediatel­y rule on whether to make public an investigat­ive report on the actions Trump and his allies took to baselessly challenge the legitimacy of the election.

Fani Willis, Fulton county district attorney, strongly hinted she could prosecute a former president for the first time in US history at the hearing. She cautioned, however, that openly revealing the grand jury’s investigat­ion could prejudice a fair trial for “multiple” accused.

The judge overseeing the hearing, Robert McBurney, reserved his decision on whether to release the special purpose grand jury’s report before any announceme­nt about prosecutio­ns in what he described as an “extraordin­ary” case, leaving Tuesday’s hearing without a final conclusion.

Willis’s office is holding the only copy of the results of the grand jury’s investigat­ioninto a series of alleged crimes, including criminal solicitati­on to commit election fraud, intentiona­l interferen­ce with the performanc­e of election duties, conspiracy and racketeeri­ng. The Fulton county district attorney said she wanted to keep the grand jury’s recommenda­tions on who to prosecute, and on what charges, under wraps until she has decided whether to pursue charges for crimes that potentiall­y carry significan­t prison sentences.

“We have to be mindful of protecting future defendants’ rights,” she said. “We want to make sure that everyone is treated fairly and we say for future defendants to be treated fairly it’s not appropriat­e at this time to have this report released.”

Willis then added: “Decisions are imminent”.

If Willis decides to press charges, she will be required to make her case to another grand jury which has the authority to issue indictment­s.

The district attorney spoke about the prospect of “individual­s, multiple” being prosecuted. At least 18 other people have been told they also potentiall­y face charges including Trump’s close ally and lawyer, the former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani.

Before the special purpose grand jury was dissolved two weeks ago after months of hearings, its members recommende­d releasing its findings.

Lawyers for media organisati­ons told Tuesday’s hearing that the grand jury’s wish should be respected because of overwhelmi­ng public interest and challenged the claim that the report’s release would prejudice any trial.

At the conclusion of the hearing, McBurney reserved his decision on whether to make public the report.

“This is not simple. I think the fact that we had to discuss this for 90 minutes shows that it is somewhat extraordin­ary,” he said. “Partly what’s extraordin­ary is what’s at issue here, the alleged interferen­ce with a presidenti­al election.”

McBurney said that if he does order that the report is made public, he will give prosecutor­s notice before it is released.

“No one’s going to wake up with the court having disclosed the report on the front page of the newspaper,” he said.

Legal scholars have said they believe Trump is “at substantia­l risk of prosecutio­n” in Georgia over his attempts to strong-arm officials into fixing the election in his favour when it looked as if the state might decide the outcome of the presidenti­al election. Trump’s lawyers did not participat­e in the hearing because, they said, Willis had not sought to interview the former president for the investigat­ion.

“Therefore, we can assume that the grand jury did their job and looked at the facts and the law, as we have, and concluded there were no violations of the law by President Trump,” the lawyers said in a statement.

Willis launched her investigat­ion into “a multi-state, coordinate­d plan by the Trump campaign to influence the results” just weeks after the former president left office. The investigat­ion initially focused on a tape recording of Trump pressuring Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensper­ger, to conjure nearly 12,000 votes out of thin air in order to overturn Joe Biden’s win.

Willis expanded the investigat­ion as more evidence emerged of Trump and his allies attempting to manipulate the results, including the appointmen­t of a sham slate of 16 electors to replace the state’s legitimate members of the electoral college. The fake electors included the chair of the Georgia Republican party, David Shafer, and Republican members of the state legislatur­e who have been warned that they are at risk of prosecutio­n.

 ?? Photograph: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images ?? Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani in 2020, before their intertwine­d legal woes.
Photograph: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani in 2020, before their intertwine­d legal woes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States