The Guardian (USA)

Biden claims ‘no regrets’ but classified papers case could come back to bite him

- Lauren Gambino in Washington

At the invitation of Joe Biden’s legal team, federal investigat­ors carried out an extraordin­ary 13-hour search of the president’s Delaware residence, scouring every room of the house from the bedrooms to the bathrooms.

It was a remarkable gesture meant to demonstrat­e the president’s full cooperatio­n with the investigat­ion. But it also led to the discovery of half a dozen items with classified markings, the latest in a series of findings that have put Biden and his presidency on the defensive as he prepares to seek a second term.

The disclosure­s have already led the justice department to appoint a special counsel to investigat­e Biden’s retention of classified documents. They have also emboldened a hostile Republican House majority eager to wield its newly acquired subpoena power, and alarmed some Democrats who just weeks ago were praising Biden’s political strength following their unexpected­ly strong midterm performanc­e.

Biden should be “embarrasse­d by the situation”, the Illinois senator Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, said during a Sunday appearance on CNN.

Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat of Virginia, also weighed in on CBS’s Face the Nation, asking: “How many documents are we talking about? Dozens? A handful or hundreds? How serious are they? Why were they taken? Did anyone have access to them? And then, is the president being cooperativ­e?”

Biden and his team have repeatedly stated that they are cooperatin­g fully with authoritie­s, a strategy the White House said was underscore­d by the unpreceden­ted offer to search a sitting president’s home.

“This was a voluntary, proactive offer by the president’s personal lawyers to DoJ to have access to the home,” a White House spokesman, Ian Sams, told reporters on Monday, adding that it demonstrat­ed “how seriously the president is taking this issue”.

But the slow trickle of revelation­s, and the White House’s piecemeal public disclosure­s, have only further intensifie­d the political furor surroundin­g the matter. Dogged by questions at every appearance, Biden has occasional­ly flashed impatience. “I think you’re going to find there’s nothing there,” he told reporters, adding: “There’s no ‘there’ there.”

The remark drew a rebuke from Senator Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat who is not shy about criticizin­g the White House. In a separate interview, Manchin took issue with Biden’s statement that he has “no regrets” about the decision not to inform the public about the initial discovery of documents in November. “I think he should have a lot of regrets,” the senator said.

Despite their dismay, the Democrats also defended the president’s cooperativ­e approach and contrasted it with Donald Trump, who is also facing a special counsel for his mishandlin­g of government documents.

There are major difference­s between the two cases. For months,

Trump resisted efforts by the government to retrieve hundreds of records marked classified, even after being served a subpoena, which ultimately led a judge to issue a search warrant of his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

“It is outrageous that either occurred,” Durbin said on CNN. “But the reaction by the former president and the current president could not be in sharper contrast.”

The trouble for Biden began on 2 November, days before the midterm elections, when the president’s personal lawyers, who were packing up his private office at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, discovered documents with classified markings from his time as vice-president. The lawyers immediatel­y notified the National Archives, whichalert­ed the justice department.

Yet the public did not learn of the findings until 9 January, when CBS News first reported on the discovery of the documents at the Penn Biden Center. The following day, at a press conference in Mexico City, Biden said he took the protection of classified informatio­n seriously and was “surprised” to learn that any sensitive materials had been found at his Washington office.

At this point, the archives had already retrieved a second batch of documents discovered in the garage at Biden’s Wilmington home in late December, but neither Biden nor his team mentioned the additional findings until their existence was revealed by NBC News a day later. Biden’s team indicated that the search had concluded only to later disclose new findings. And even after his lawyers declared the search complete, additional secret documents have been recovered.

Bob Bauer, Biden’s top personal lawyer, said the president’s legal team would endeavor to balance “the importance of public transparen­cy” with the “norms and limitation­s necessary to protect the investigat­ion’s integrity”.

“Regular ongoing public disclosure­s also pose the risk that, as further informatio­n develops, answers provided on

this periodic basis may be incomplete,” he wrote in a statement.

Lanny Davis, a prominent Washington lawyer who served as special counsel to former president Bill Clinton as he faced investigat­ions from independen­t counsel Ken Starr, said there was often an “inherent disconnect” between a president’s lawyers and the communicat­ions staff over what to keep secret and what to make public.

Davis, whose 1999 White House memoir, Truth to Tell, was aptly subtitled: Tell It Early, Tell It All, Tell It Yourself, said he understood the Biden team’s initial instinct not to disclose the revelation­s publicly out of deference to the justice department. But he wondered, “with the wisdom of hindsight” and the caveat that he is not privy to internal deliberati­ons, why Biden’s team hadn’t been more forthcomin­g, especially with the findings it knew would be made public.

Aides and allies of the president argue that Americans are more concerned with the president’s record, including a string of legislativ­e accomplish­ments that Biden will tout during visits to Maryland and New York next week.

Yet Biden’s approval ratings have dipped in recent weeks, hovering near the lowest levels of his presidency, according to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll. A new ABC News/Ipsos survey found that strong majorities of Americans disapprove­d of the way Biden and Trump handled classified materials. Some draw a distinctio­n between the cases, with 43% of Americans saying Trump’s behavior was “a more serious concern” compared with 20% who said Biden’s was more serious.

Neverthele­ss, the controvers­y arrives at a delicate time for the 80-yearold president. Biden initially ran for the White House promising to restore competency and calm to the office after four years of norm-breaking tumult under Trump, who is running again for president in 2024.

Despite lingering concerns about his age and new concerns that the controvers­y will tarnish his political standing, Democrats appear to have largely accepted that Biden will be their standard-bearer in 2024.

Both Republican­s and Democrats agree that Biden’s situation plays to Trump’s benefit. It muddles the case against the former president, at least in the court of public opinion, making it harder for Democrats to use it against him.

In a wrinkle that may further compound public perception­s of how public officials handle government secrets, it was revealed on Tuesday that aides to Mike Pence, the former vicepresid­ent viewed as a potential 2024 contender, discovered about a dozen classified-marked documents stored in boxes at his Indiana home.

The developmen­t is likely to revive a longstandi­ng debate over the vast volumes of informatio­n that the government deems classified. Transparen­cy advocates, lawmakers of both parties, and former federal officials, including one in charge of administer­ing it, have all denounced the overly broad nature of a classifica­tion system that they say incentiviz­es the government to keep documents secret at the expense of accountabi­lity.

Neverthele­ss, the Biden revelation­s have delighted House Republican­s, eager to distract from their own chaotic start. They are charging ahead with an investigat­ion into Biden’s handling of sensitive materials they say may have compromise­d national security – even as they downplay the matter as it relates to Trump, and now Pence.

Congressma­n James Comer, the new Republican chair of the House oversight and accountabi­lity committee, who immediatel­y launched an investigat­ion into the Biden documents after accusing the president of “potentiall­y violating the law”, praised Pence’s handling of the situation.

“Pence’s transparen­cy stands in stark contrast to Biden White House staff who continue to withhold informatio­n from Congress and the American people,” he said in a statement.

And despite the fact that three top contenders for president are now entangled in controvers­ies, Republican­s have shown no signs of recalibrat­ing.

On Wednesday, Elise Stefanik, the House Republican conference chair, also brushed aside the need for further scrutiny of Pence, who she commended for “following the process”. She claimed Biden’s case, however, posed a “longstandi­ng national security threat” that would “absolutely” be a focus of their oversight agenda going forward.

 ?? Photograph: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images ?? Democrats appear to have largely accepted that Joe Biden will be their standard-bearer in 2024.
Photograph: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images Democrats appear to have largely accepted that Joe Biden will be their standard-bearer in 2024.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States