The Guardian (USA)

Italy’s referees punish more dark-skinned footballer­s than light

- James Tapper

Referees in Italy’s top football league give more yellow and red cards to Black and darker-skinned players than to their light-skinned teammates, research shows.

Officials in Serie A awarded an average of 20% more fouls per season against darker-skinned players from 2009 to 2019, with 11% more yellow cards and 16% more red cards.

But during the Covid-19 pandemic, when matches were played in empty stadiums, there was no bias in the way referees treated players. This demonstrat­es that authoritie­s should prioritise banning fans responsibl­e for racist incidents, the researcher­s say.

Many Italian clubs have large numbers of far-right supporters; players, including Romelu Lukaku, Kalidou Koulibaly and Mario Balotelli, have regularly been racially abused. This season, Serie A authoritie­s have launched investigat­ions into racist chanting by Lazio and Napoli fans.

The researcher­s, Beatrice Magistro and Morgan Wack, said they plan to examine other European leagues.

Vinícius Júnior, the Real Madrid winger from Brazil, has been targeted five times this season in Spain’s La Liga, while Birmingham City goalkeeper Neil Etheridge was racially abused last month during an FA Cup game against Blackburn. Last season, 183 incidents were reported to the antidiscri­mination body Kick It Out in English profession­al football.

Magistro and Wack studied data on every Serie A match between 2009 and 2021 for their paper in the journal Sociology, published by the British Sociologic­al Associatio­n.They analysed data from FootyStats, WhoScored and FBref on tackles, fouls and cards against skin- tone data from the Football Manager video game. Developed by British company Sports Interactiv­e, the game is used by profession­al clubs to scout players and is licensed to reproduce images of footballer­s, graphicall­y representi­ng them using one of 20 skin-tone categories.

Magistro, from the University of Toronto, said most European countries collect very little data on race, which makes it “really hard to test” the level of racism in football. “A lot of studies have relied on very imperfect categorisa­tions like country of origin, or putting all Europeans as white and

South Americans as non-white, which is problemati­c,” she said.

Since players may be more likely to commit fouls depending on the position they play, how many minutes they are on the pitch, the number of tackles they make and the country where they grew up playing football, the researcher­s used a regression analysis to strip out these factors.

It showed that lighter-skinned players were judged to have fouled an average of 21 times over a season compared with 25 for darker-skinned players, who got an average 3.9 yellow cards and 0.22 red cards per season compared with 3.5 yellows and 0.19 reds per lighter-skinned player.

The finding was “disturbing”, Magistro said, but: “We were thinking it’s possible it’s not entirely the referee – it’s possible maybe the noise they hear from the stands.” Referees make about 200 to 250 decisions about fouls each game – roughly every 22 seconds.

The researcher­s had no data on home and away games so looked instead at the 2020-21 season, when fans were not allowed in stadiums as a precaution against Covid. “We found the effect disappeare­d,” Magistro said. “Since it is only one year, we don’t want to say for sure that all the racism comes from fans.

“We also found darker-skinned players are less likely to play aggressive­ly. People had said: ‘Maybe some of these players come from different leagues where they play more aggressive­ly’. We tested for that and they actually play less aggressive­ly, possibly knowing they’re more likely to receive sanctions.”

Wack, who is from the University of Washington in Seattle, said that their findings challenged the idea that “rogue referees” were to blame. “If it is this kind of fan-driven bias that ... pressures them into making decisions, that has different implicatio­ns,” he said.

Magistro and Wack said that it was highly probable bias had affected the results of games and salary negotiatio­ns for players, and said that Uefa should consider broadening its “threestep procedure” on racist chants from the stands and introducin­g officials who are responsibl­e for monitoring crowds for racial harassment. Italy’s office against racial discrimina­tion, Unar, has set up national observator­y against discrimina­tion in sport that reported for the first time in October last year. It said 211 cases had been detected in amateur and profession­al sport, and its recommenda­tions included training football referees to recognise discrimina­tion.

Magistro said similar research on the US National Basketball Associatio­n by researcher­s at the Brookings Institute, the Washington-based thinktank, offered hope of change.

“They found the exact same thing,” she said. “Once they publicised that, they retested the same thing a few years later and they found that the effect disappeare­d. Making it public somehow contribute­d to the process becoming more fair. So maybe the referees will realise that.”

 ?? ?? The crowd in Rome for Lazio against Danish club FC Midtjyllan­d. Photograph: Alberto Lingria/Reuters
The crowd in Rome for Lazio against Danish club FC Midtjyllan­d. Photograph: Alberto Lingria/Reuters
 ?? Photograph: Silvia Lore/Getty Images ?? Dos Santos De Paulo Dodo of ACF Fiorentina reacts to a red card during a Serie A match with AS Roma in January 2023.
Photograph: Silvia Lore/Getty Images Dos Santos De Paulo Dodo of ACF Fiorentina reacts to a red card during a Serie A match with AS Roma in January 2023.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States