The Guardian (USA)

Russia disinforma­tion looks to US far right to weaken Ukraine support

- Peter Stone in Washington

As Russia’s ruthless war against Ukraine has faced major setbacks since it began a year ago, the Kremlin has deployed new disinforma­tion themes and tactics to weaken US support for Kyiv with help from conservati­ve media stars and some Republican­s in Congress, according to new studies and experts.

Moscow’s disinforma­tion messages have included widely debunked conspiracy theories about US bioweapon labs in Ukraine, and pet themes on the American right that portray the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, as an ally in backing traditiona­l values, religion and family in the fight against “woke” ideas.

Further, new studies from thinktanks that track disinforma­tion have noted that alternativ­e social media platforms such as Parler, Rumble, Gab and Odysee have increasing­ly been used to spread Russian falsehoods since Facebook and Twitter have imposed more curbs on Moscow’s propaganda.

Other pro-Russian messages focused on the economic costs of the war for the US have been echoed by Republican­s in the powerful far-right House Freedom Caucus such as Marjorie Taylor Greene, Scott Perry and Paul Gosar, who to varying degrees have questioned giving Ukraine more military aid and demanded tougher oversight.

Since Russia launched its invasion last February, the Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Trump ally – turned influentia­l far-right podcaster – Steve Bannon have promoted some of the most baseless claims that help bolster the Kremlin’s aggression.

For instance, Bannon’s War Room podcast in February 2022 featured an interview with Erik Prince, the wealthy US founder of Blackwater, where they both enthused that Putin’s policies were “anti-woke” and praised Putin’s homophobia and transphobi­a.

Last month too on the anniversar­y of Moscow’s invasion, Carlson revved up his attacks on US support for Ukraine claiming falsely that Biden’s goal had become “overthrowi­ng Putin and putting American tanks in Red Square because, sure, we could manage Russia once we overthrow the dictator”.

Analysts who track Russia’s disinforma­tion see synergies between the Kremlin and parts of the US right that have helped spread some of the biggest falsehoods since the start of the invasion.

“Russia doesn’t pull even its most outlandish narratives out of thin air – it builds on existing resentment­s and political fissures,” Jessica Brandt, a policy director at the Brookings Institutio­n who tracks disinforma­tion and foreign interferen­ce, told the Guardian.

She added: “So you often have a sort of harmony – both Kremlin messengers and key media figures, each for their own reasons, have an interest in dinging the administra­tion for its handling of the Ukraine crisis, in amplifying distrust of authoritat­ive media, in playing on skepticism about the origins of Covid and frustratio­n with government mitigation measures.”

“That was the case with the biolabs conspiracy theory, for example, which posits that the Pentagon has been supporting the developmen­t of biological weapons in Ukraine. The Charlie Kirk Show and Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast, among others, devoted multiple segments to the claim. It’s not so much that we’re witnessing any sort of coordinati­on, but rather an alignment of interests.”

Brandt also noted that Russia had an “interest in promoting authentic American voices expressing views that align with the Kremlin’s foreign policy goals. And that’s why you often see them retweet Americans that make these arguments.”

Likewise, two reports issued separately last month by the Alliance for Securing Democracy and the Atlantic Council, reveal how Russian state media have shifted some messaging themes and adopted new tactics with an eye to undercutti­ng US backing for Ukraine.

The Alliance report documented a shift in messaging in the US and Europe from directly defending Russia’s invasion to stressing the energy and economic impacts that it was having, themes that seem to be resonating with some Republican politician­s.

In the first six months of the war, Alliance data revealed that Russia-linked accounts on Twitter mentioned “Nazi” in more than 5,800tweets.

But in the following six months from August 2022 through January 2023, “the number of ‘Nazi’ tweets dropped to 3,373 – a 42% decline”. Likewise, mentions of Nato by Russianlin­ked accounts on Twitter dropped by roughly 30% in the second six-month period.

By contrast, in the most recent six-month period the report said that “tweets mentioning both ‘energy’ and ‘Ukraine’ increased by 267%, while tweets mentioning ‘cost of living’ increased 66%” compared to the first six months of the war.

In another twist, Bret Schafer, who leads the Alliance’s informatio­n manipulati­on team, told the Guardian: “In response to restrictio­ns and crackdowns by major tech platforms, accounts and channels affiliated with Russian state media outlet RT, which has been banned entirely on YouTube, have fanned out across alternativ­e social media and video sharing platforms like Rumble and Odysee that have less restrictiv­e content moderation policies and that allow RT to operate without labels or restrictio­ns.

“Those platforms also tend to cater to audiences who are not necessaril­y pro-Russian, but are certainly more apt, based on the other videos found on those platforms, to oppose continued support for Ukraine.”

 ?? Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto/Rex/Shuttersto­ck ?? A report found Russia-linked accounts on Twitter have shifted toward stressing energy and economic impacts of the war. Photograph:
Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto/Rex/Shuttersto­ck A report found Russia-linked accounts on Twitter have shifted toward stressing energy and economic impacts of the war. Photograph:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States