The Guardian (USA)

North Carolina residents urge UN to investigat­e toxic PFAS pollution

- Tom Perkins

A citizens group in North Carolina has formally requested the United Nations to investigat­e multiple alleged human rights violations stemming from chemical manufactur­er Chemours’ toxic PFAS pollution in the region.

About a half million residents live in the Cape Fear River basin between Fayettevil­le and Wilmington, where Chemours has produced PFAS and polluted the region for over 40 years. The residents face “an environmen­tal human rights crisis … involving pervasive human exposure to toxic chemicals”, according to a communicat­ion filed with the UN by Clean Cape Fear and the University of California at Berkeley Environmen­tal Law Clinic.

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoro­alkyl substances, are a class of about 14,000 chemicals often used to make products resistant to water, stains and heat. They are called “forever chemicals” because they are virtually indestruct­ible, and they are linked to cancer, liver problems, thyroid issues, birth defects, kidney disease, decreased immunity and other serious health problems.

A UN human rights commission investigat­ion there would be the first to look into an environmen­tal crisis in the US. Residents say they have been denied the right to clean water, bodily integrity, informatio­n, an effective remedy, and a clean, healthy and sustainabl­e environmen­t.

University researcher­s first discovered the pollution in 2017, and North Carolinian­s are “in disbelief that we are still living with this”, said Clean Cape Fear co-founder Emily Donovan, who resides near Wilmington.

“We’re nearly six years into this and my kids still go to a school that has water with high levels of PFAS,” she added. “Everyone is aware of the problem … and is outraged, and we’re all asking, ‘Why is this still going on?’”

Chemours is among the world’s largest PFAS producers, and last year the Guardian detailed how pollution from its Fayettevil­le Works plant has contaminat­ed the air, soil, and water throughout hundreds of square miles in the Cape Fear River basin.

For decades, many residents unknowingl­y drank water contaminat­ed with PFAS at levels thousands of times above what the EPA now considers safe for some compounds. The chemicals have also been found in food grown in the region. At popular tourist beaches, children have played in toxic PFAS foam spread across the sand, and the chemicals are thought to be killing pets and sickening alligators, birds and fish in the basin.

Residents suspect the pollution is behind anecdotall­y high levels of cancer and other diseases linked to exposure to the chemicals. Though a brief state health department analysis found elevated levels of one kind of cancer, it and the EPA have refused to carry out the kind of epidemiolo­gical studies needed to determine the pollution’s full health effects, and which are required to hold Chemours legally responsibl­e for health problems.

“The pervasive toxificati­on of human bodies and the ecosystem of the lower Cape Fear River watershed with PFAS that persist essentiall­y forever lends particular urgency to controllin­g these toxics at their source,” the complaint states.

Chemours did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

The communicat­ion comes as Chemours

is seeking a state permit to expand Fayettevil­le Works’ production, and just after a federal judge threw out a lawsuit asking the court to force the EPA to take stronger action in the region.

In a statement, Chemours said it is “unfortunat­e to see misinforma­tion campaigns like this continue to be aggressive­ly advanced by groups unwilling to acknowledg­e the proven progress made or the truth that not all PFAS originates from our site”.

The EPA, state and Chemours have taken some steps to rein in the plant’s discharges, but contaminat­ion levels still remain well above EPA limits for some PFAS compounds.

“The EPA and [North Carolina Department of Environmen­tal Quality] are also, through regulatory timidity and enforcemen­t half-measures, responsibl­e for acquiescin­g in past and ongoing human rights violations,” the complaint states.

If the UN human rights commission chooses to investigat­e, a special rapporteur would fact-check the allegation­s in the communicat­ion, then issue “pointed” allegation letters to regulators, Chemours and other culpable parties detailing problems and posing questions, said Claudia Polsky, director of UC Berkley Law Clinic.

Businesses and government­s would have a chance to respond, and usually do, Polsky said. Internatio­nal law is not legally binding, but the process would “put recipients on the defensive” and provide a platform on which the region’s compelling human rights violation narrative is told “to the world at large”, Polsky said. That would put tremendous pressure on the government to act, she added.

“It’s not just words in the wind,” Polsky said, adding that it can also “provide cover and give backbone to agencies to do things they may want to do, but feel browbeaten by industry.”

The communicat­ion asks the special rapporteur to pressure regulators to stop the Fayettevil­le Works expansion, ensure clean water in the region, conduct an epidemiolo­gical study, hold Chemours financiall­y responsibl­e for cleanup and ban the entire PFAS for non-essential uses, among other measures.

The UN in 2021 investigat­ed alleged human rights violations in Veneto, Italy, where the environmen­t was also thoroughly contaminat­ed by PFAS. That “inspired” those in the Cape Fear basin, Donovan said.

“There’s a lack of accountabi­lity so we’ll ask anyone who is willing to help, and we thought ‘Maybe that’s the kind of leverage that we need,’” she added.

 ?? Gerry Broome/AP ?? Chemours’ manufactur­ing plant at Fayettevil­le Works. Residents face ‘an environmen­tal human rights crisis’, the complaint says. Photograph:
Gerry Broome/AP Chemours’ manufactur­ing plant at Fayettevil­le Works. Residents face ‘an environmen­tal human rights crisis’, the complaint says. Photograph:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States