The Guardian (USA)

I wept for Ken: why men have the most to gain from watching Barbie

- Akin Olla

Ididn’t expect to cry during Barbie, let alone to weep for Ken, the lonely man-child who’s barely more significan­t than the ampersand that sits between him and his lover’s name. While Greta Gerwig’s movie is full of feminist sentiment, much of it feels like deeply trodden ground, long explored by movies from 2001’s lightheart­ed Legally Blonde to 2014’s cutting Gone Girl. What sets Barbie apart is its introducti­on to the mainstream of an idea introduced by feminists like bell hooks – that men too can benefit from feminism and are actively harmed by the capitalist patriarcha­l systems that allow a small group of men to dominate society while individual men get to dominate their homes and workplaces, isolating themselves from their family and inner selves in the process.

Much of the film is set in Barbieland, a fictional universe in which Barbies lovingly reign supreme and Ken dolls are relegated to essentiall­y worshippin­g their Barbies and living for little else. Our main Ken, played by Ryan Gosling, is especially dour about the situation, feeling neglected by his Barbie, played by Margot Robbie, and in constant competitio­n with other Kens for her affection. After following Barbie to our world – the real world, so to speak – Ken is struck by the inverted gender dynamics and seeks to bring the dominance of men to Barbieland. He returns to establish the “Kendom”, institutin­g Kens at the top and placing Barbies in subservien­t roles that exist to coddle, pamper and perform cuteness for the Kens in their lives. The new society eventually collapses due to infighting among the Kens. Upon the final crash, Gosling’s Ken admits he was never really happy with patriarchy either.

The plight of Ken under Kendom closely resembles the condition of men in our own society. While rich men – who seem to be quite miserable and unfulfille­d – lord over society, the masses of men suffer in isolation and competitio­n.

According to a 2021 American Perspectiv­es Survey, 15% of men don’t have a single close friend; 28% of men under the age of 30 report having no close social connection­s, meaning that they haven’t had a single important per

sonal conversati­on within the last six months. This doesn’t only affect cisgender men: some trans men report new feelings of isolation and increased difficulty with connecting with other men after transition­ing.

And social isolation can be devastatin­g. According to the CDC, such isolation “significan­tly [increases] a person’s risk of premature death from all causes, a risk that may rival those of smoking …” This is terrifying, with implicatio­ns not only for the men who are increasing­ly likely to harm themselves but for those around them. According to Jillian Peterson, a professor of criminolog­y at Hamline University, that kind of isolation leads to self-hate, and men who externaliz­e that self-hate are perfect candidates for becoming mass shooters.

While that is the most extreme end of it, there are lesser but still harmful consequenc­es to a society based on competitio­n and domination of other nations, companies, and human beings. Since most men cannot dominate their own society, they are pushed to dominate those closest to them. This shows up in increasing domestic homicide rates and emotional abuse like Jonah Hill’s attempts to control his now exgirlfrie­nd’s life by forcing her to abandon her career to prop up his insecure ego. At the heart of these patterns of toxic masculinit­y is a sense of valuelessn­ess engendered by an economic system that relies on gender roles.

Much like Ken’s entire life and identity revolves around Barbie, most men’s lives revolve around capitalism and providing value for wealthier men – an unequal exchange that often masquerade­s as hustle culture, entreprene­urship or career climbing.

Capitalism replaced communitie­s with nuclear families, demanding that individual men become the main source of resource acquisitio­n for their loved ones. This identity as a breadwinne­r is burdensome, especially in a zero-sum system in which one person’s employment often means another person’s unemployme­nt, in the same way that there can only be one Ken for each Barbie. All humans have become mere calculatio­ns for corporatio­ns, just as replaceabl­e as the machines and tools we operate, and I think men feel that in their bones.

This is not to say that people who aren’t men are having a blast under our system. They’re not, asdemonstr­ated by record rates of depression among teenage girls. But girls and women have long theorized and built vehicles for their emancipati­on from this system, while men have only recently begun to wake up to the reality that a more just world would be good for them too.

Unfortunat­ely, a lot of men are being organized in the opposite direction. The rise of the “manosphere” – a network of misogynist communitie­s with digital platforms like blogs, podcasts and forums – is a real threat to the liberation of men from their plight. Incels and male supremacis­ts use men’s very real struggles to fuel hatred towards women while ignoring the systemic roots of their own pain. They demonize and attack the Barbies in their life, evading the reality that Barbieland was maintained externally by the men of Matt el. Mano sphere spaces serve as a path towards rightwing extremism for young men: what starts as resentment towards a crush can quickly become active harassment, violence, and even mass violence – as in the case of Elliot Rodger, the Santa Barbara shooter who killed six people in 2014, and has since become a hero to some sections of the ma no sphere. Organizati­ons like Black Men Build are providing clear paths for Black men, and others, to engage in their own liberation. Through monthly conversati­ons about how issues like abuse and assault affect men, too, as well as community service and political education, participan­ts get a deeper sense of how the system works and how it impacts them.

We need more of this – more men who are interested in not only transformi­ng themselves but transformi­ng our entire society into something beautiful and gentle and worth living in, a Barbieland for us all.

 ?? Photograph: Jorge Nunez/Zuma/Shuttersto­ck ?? ‘What sets Barbie apart is its introducti­on to the mainstream of an idea introduced by feminists like bell hooks – that men too can benefit from feminism and are actively harmed by capitalist patriarcha­l systems.’
Photograph: Jorge Nunez/Zuma/Shuttersto­ck ‘What sets Barbie apart is its introducti­on to the mainstream of an idea introduced by feminists like bell hooks – that men too can benefit from feminism and are actively harmed by capitalist patriarcha­l systems.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States