The Guardian (USA)

How the EU Digital Services Act affects Facebook, Google and others

- Lisa O'Carroll in Brussels

Unpreceden­ted regulation forcing more than 40 online giants including Facebook, X, Google and TikTok to better police the content they deliver within the EU is due to come into force on 25 August. So what is the legislatio­n and how will regulators enforce it? Digital Services Act (DSA)

The DSA is a groundbrea­king law that will apply to any digital operation serving the EU, forcing them to be legally accountabl­e for everything from fake news to manipulati­on of shoppers, Russian propaganda and criminal activity including child abuse.

It will apply to large and small operators, but the rules are tiered, with the toughest obligation­s applying to 17 companies including Facebook and Amazon that have been designated as “very large online platforms”, and two “very large online search engines”: Google and Bing.

Those that do not comply face sanctions including large fines – which could run into hundreds of millions of euros – and a EU-wide ban.

So what are the new rules?

They are themed around five key issues, including online disinforma­tion and other societal risks.

1 Illegal products

Platforms will be obliged to combat the sale of illegal products and services, which will affect Amazon and Facebook Marketplac­e among others.

2 Illegal content

New measures are designed to crack down on illegal content – including Russian propaganda, interferen­ce with elections, hate crimes and online harms including harassment and child abuse – and ensure that fundamenta­l rights recognised by law across Europe, including freedom of expression and data protection, are safeguarde­d.

3 Protection of children

For parents, unable to police everything their child sees, this cluster of rules is probably the single most important.

Platforms will be prohibited from targeting children with advertisin­g based on their personal data or cookies.

Big social media firms will be required to redesign their systems to ensure a “high level of privacy, security and safety of minors” and prove they have done so to the European Commission.

Platforms will also have to redesign their content “recommende­r systems” to reduce risks to children.

They will also have to carry out a risk assessment of negative effects on children’s mental health and present it to the commission in August.

Last year, the world’s largest social media firms were accused of “mone

tising misery” after an inquest ruled that harmful online content contribute­d to the death of 14-year-old Molly Russell in the UK.

4 Racial and gender diversity

Social media companies will not be able to use sensitive personal data including race, gender and religion to target users with adverts.

5 Ban on “dark patterns”

For shoppers, this is protection from everyday interfaces used to manipulate users into buying things they don’t need or want.

An audit of 399 online shops by the commission and national consumer authoritie­s this year found that 40% relied on “manipulati­ve practices to exploit consumers’ vulnerabil­ities or trick them”.

The EU justice commission­er revealed that 42 sites used fake countdown timers with fake deadlines for purchasing, with 70 sites “hiding” important informatio­n such as delivery costs or the availabili­ty of a cheaper option.

The audit found that 23 sites hid informatio­n with the aim of “manipulati­ng consumers into entering a subscripti­on”.

Under the new rules, these should go.

Anything else?

Consumers will be able to report transgress­ions and expect changes.

Plus, tech companies will be banned from ranking their own services more favourably than others, and they will need to stop making it difficult to uninstall pre-loaded software and apps.

What are the big tech companies doing about the new law?

“For very large online platforms, the societal stakes are higher, and the rules include additional measures to assess and mitigate societal risks that are linked to their advertisin­g systems, for example in catalysing disinforma­tion,” said a commission spokespers­on.

The commission’s voluntary code of practice, which is seen as a “nursery slope” to prepare internal systems for the new regulatory regime, has already been endorsed by 44 big tech firms. What about X/Twitter?

X, formerly known as Twitter, quit the voluntary code of practice agreement earlier this year, but in June it said it would comply with the rules after a team of EU officials led by the internal market commission­er, Thierry Breton, visited its California HQ to “stress test” the company’s moderation and compliance systems.

Breton, the commission­er responsibl­e for enforcing the DSA, welcomed Elon Musk’s change of heart, but warned that there would be “no half measures” when it came to sanctions for online crimes.

X/Twitter on notice

After his trip to Musk’s HQ inJune, Breton said the EU would be extremely vigilant coming up to the EU elections next year.

“I told Elon Musk and Linda Yaccarino [Twitter’s chief executive] that Twitter should be very diligent in preparing to tackle illegal content in the European Union.

“Fighting disinforma­tion, including pro-Russian propaganda, will also be a focus area in particular as we are entering a period of elections in Europe.” What are the sanctions?

A firm that does not comply with the law could face a complete ban in Europe or fines running up to 6% of its global revenue.

Last month, X/Twitter said it was on track to generate $3bn (£2.4bn) in revenue. A fine of 6% would be the equivalent of £144m.

 ?? ?? The tiered legislatio­n will require larger platforms and search engines to follow tougher obligation­s. Photograph: Denis Charlet/AFP/Getty Images
The tiered legislatio­n will require larger platforms and search engines to follow tougher obligation­s. Photograph: Denis Charlet/AFP/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States