The Guardian (USA)

Wisconsin Republican­s vote to fire top election official as denialists tighten grip

- Alice Herman in Madison, Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s top elections official suffered another blow on Thursday when the Republican-controlled state senate voted to fire her by a party line vote of 22 to 11. Meagan Wolfe’s status as elections administra­tor will now likely be determined in court.

Legal experts and the Wisconsin attorney general have disputed the move by Republican senators to remove Wolfe, a respected and accomplish­ed non-partisan leader. Her removal would affect the administra­tion of elections in 2024 and illustrate­s the increasing­ly wide reach of election deniers and rightwing conspiracy theorists in Wisconsin politics.

Before she became a lightning rod for conspiracy theories and criticism surroundin­g the 2020 election, Wolfe enjoyed wide support from Republican­s in the state legislatur­e. Appointed to head the Wisconsin elections commission in 2018, she was confirmed by a unanimous vote in the state senate in 2019.

When the Covid-19 virus pummeled Wisconsin, disrupting elections, an attorney representi­ng the Republican assembly speaker, Robin Vos, and the former senate majority leader Scott Fitzgerald wrote in a letter that they “wholeheart­edly support” many protocols outlined by the statewide commission.

Crucially, Wolfe, who provides expertise and recommenda­tions to the commission, serves at their direction – and not the other way around.

One pandemic-era policy that has come under fire by Republican­s, creating temporary adjustment­s to nursing home voting, was issued by a unanimous vote of the three Democratic and three Republican commission­ers.

“Meagan is being blamed for the decisions of her commission,” said Claire Woodall-Vogg, executive director of Milwaukee’s election commission. “It’s really unfortunat­e that she’s being used as the scapegoat when she was not the person responsibl­e for making any decisions that they’re punishing her for.”

It was only after the 2020 election, which Donald Trump lost to president Joe Biden by just over 20,000 votes in Wisconsin, that complaints about the nonpartisa­n administra­tor began to circulate. Groups and individual­s that spread falsehoods about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election have obsessed over Wolfe, publishing missives in Gateway Pundit, a site that peddles misinforma­tion, and earning a warning from state capitol police for allegedly stalking her.

State lawmakers, largely focusing their criticisms on pandemic-related policies like the expanded use of ballot drop boxes and the guidance for nursing home voting, joined the chorus calling for Wolfe’s ouster.

When Wolfe’s term ended in June, Democrats on the bipartisan commission blocked a vote to send a recommenda­tion for her reappointm­ent to the state senate, anticipati­ng the senate would in turn vote to fire her. The commission­ers relied on precedent from a 2022 Wisconsin supreme court ruling that found a Republican member of the state’s natural resources board who declined to put himself forward for reappointm­ent in 2021 could not be removed from office.

Still, Republican­s moved forward with reappointm­ent proceeding­s for Wolfe, holding a 29 August hearing where election deniers and conspiracy theorists from around the state gathered to air their grievances about Wisconsin elections. In a letter, the Democratic attorney general, Josh Kaul, wrote that the state senate had “no current authority to confirm or reject the appointmen­t of a WEC administra­tor”, an opinion that was echoed by the legislatur­e’s own nonpartisa­n attorneys.

Jeff Smith, a Democratic state senator on the shared revenue, elections and consumer protection committee who abstained from a committee vote on Wolfe’s reappointm­ent, said in a statement that the vote was “not properly before the Senate or its committees”, adding that he has “full confidence in Administra­tor Wolfe and the work that she has done for the people of Wisconsin”.

Devin LeMahieu, the Republican state senate majority leader who voted against Wolfe’s reappointm­ent, previously accused the administra­tor of “mishandlin­g” the 2020 election. LeMahieu’s office did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

During the floor session on Thursday, the Democratic senate minority leader, Melissa Agard, described the move to oust Wolfe as one of many “shameless continued attacks on our elections”.

Democrats in the state senate objected to the vote repeatedly. Mark Spreitzer, a Democratic member of the senate’s shared revenue, elections and consumer protection committee, called the nomination “fake” and accused Republican­s in the senate of indulging conspiracy theorists.

Senators opposing the vote noted the wide-ranging implicatio­ns of Wolfe’s disputed reappointm­ent process.

“Disenfranc­hisement was real,” said the Democratic state senator Lena Taylor, describing the long lines that plagued polling places in Milwaukee during the spring 2020 election. Taylor argued that the vote – which she described as a “sham process” – would delegitima­te sincere elections concerns in favor of falsehoods and conspiracy theories.

LeMahieu disputed Democrats’ opposition to the process, instead blaming Democrats on the elections commission for blocking the commission from advancing Wolfe’s nomination to the senate. The Thursday vote, LeMahieu said, “represents the lack of faith” in Wisconsin elections, sidesteppi­ng claims that the process would embolden conspiracy theorists.

Elections officials in Wisconsin worry the ongoing proceeding­s will fuel more misinforma­tion about elections and say their work will be negatively impacted if Wolfe leaves her position or is removed from office.

“We’re already dealing with extra public records requests that are coming through in regards to elections,” said Kaci Lundgren, a Douglas county clerk. “Laws change all the time in regards to elections, so to have that experience and that knowledge gone, it would be disconcert­ing, it would be difficult. Frustratin­g.”

Woodall-Vogg agreed, describing the possible vacancy as “a major blow”. The Milwaukee official added that a disruption in leadership would likely impact the staff of the elections commission, who provide technical assistance to clerks across the state. “I think what is most disappoint­ing is that they’re bringing a nonpartisa­n election official and making her position very political.”

Shortly after the vote Thursday, Kaul announced he had filed a lawsuit against Republican leaders, seeking to keep Wolfe in her job.

“The story today is not what the senate has purported to do with its vote,” he said in a press release. “It’s that the senate has blatantly disregarde­d state law in order to put its full stamp of approval on the ongoing baseless attacks on our democracy.”

Addressing reporters Thursday afternoon, Wolfe said she would remain in her position until a court said otherwise. She said Republican­s sought to oust her because “I will not bend to political pressure”.

“The senate’s vote today to remove me is not a referendum on the job I do, but rather a reaction to not achieving the political outcome they desire,” she said. “The political outcome they desired, I believe is to get rid of me. The reason they want to get rid of me for political purposes is because I will not bend to political pressure.”

She also expressed some disbelief that many of the claims that her office had repeatedly debunked continued to circulate in front of the legislatur­e and were relied on as a basis for trying to remove her.

“It is sometimes hard to wrap my head around how we still are here,” she said.

Join us for a live event on 26 September in Chicago, Democracy and Distrust: Overcoming threats to the 2024 election.

 ?? Photograph: Ruthie Hauge/AP ?? Wolfe’s removal, which will now likely be determined in court, will affect the administra­tion of elections in 2024.
Photograph: Ruthie Hauge/AP Wolfe’s removal, which will now likely be determined in court, will affect the administra­tion of elections in 2024.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States