The Guardian (USA)

A written constituti­on won’t right Britain’s wrongs

- Hampshire Newcastle upon Tyne • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Pleaseemai­lus your letter and it will be considered for publicatio­n in ourletters­section.

Gavin Esler (Here’s the key question about Britain in 2023: why do we put up with this rubbish?, 25 October) makes some good points, but his implicatio­n that we should have a written constituti­on, as the US does, should be resisted. There’s no more pernicious element in American life than the country’s practicall­y irreformab­le constituti­on. Made for a slave-owning gentry republic (not a modern democracy), the constituti­on sports an electoral college that can, and does, overturn democratic­ally elected majorities – often in cahoots with the supreme court, one of the world’s most nakedly political courts (and we complain about Hungary and Poland).

The US constituti­on makes it impossible to legislate for firearms control and periodical­ly allows an irresponsi­ble legislatur­e to threaten the dissolutio­n of all federal government by withholdin­g the revenue needed for the armed forces and civil servants. The US constituti­on is an affliction that Americans must bear. Let’s not have one. George Baugh Much Wenlock, Shropshire

• Gavin Esler says that ours is an antiquated democratic system. How can it be described as democratic at all when we have an unelected head of state, an unelected second chamber, a voting system that gives huge majorities in parliament with less than 50% of the vote?

In addition, we have three different sorts of devolution to the three smallest parts of the UK and no effective devolution to the much larger regions of England. Dr Ken HughesHale Barns,Greater Manchester

• Gavin Esler’s article poses the questions “why are things so … shit?” and how it is that Liz Truss, Chris Grayling and others seem to repeatedly fail upwards? Esler proposes constituti­onal change as the solution. There is a much swifter alternativ­e. Don’t vote for people who don’t use public transport. Don’t vote for people who don’t send their children to local schools. Don’t vote for people who don’t use the NHS. Don’t vote for people without links to your local community. Forget constituti­onal change. Politics can be that simple. Peter RiddleWirk­sworth, Derbyshire

• Gavin Esler’s excellent article identifies the first necessary step in halting our prolonged descent into dysfunctio­n and despair. This age-old decline will not be reversed without grasping the nettle of constituti­onal reform. How Keir Starmer can be so blind as to claim electoral reform especially is “not a priority” beggars belief. Dr Robert HercliffeL­ee-on-the-Solent,

• Gavin Esler has it right. Almost every democratic country in the world except the UK has a written contract between its people and their government: a constituti­on. No sane person would agree to buy a house or a car from a salesman who said that there was no need for a written contract and that “their word was their bond”. And yet most British citizens seem happy to accept that situation with regards to their country. While there are plenty of other challenges facing the UK right now, a written constituti­on, created by the people, would go some way to resolving much of the dissemblin­g, lying and corruption that are now endemic in our political system. It’s long past time to boot the dodgy car salesmen out of Westminste­r. Stephen Psallidas

 ?? Riddle. Photograph: PA ?? ‘Don’t vote for people who don’t use the NHS. Don’t vote for people without links to your local community. Forget constituti­onal change. Politics can be that simple,’ says Peter
Riddle. Photograph: PA ‘Don’t vote for people who don’t use the NHS. Don’t vote for people without links to your local community. Forget constituti­onal change. Politics can be that simple,’ says Peter

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States