The Guardian (USA)

In search of the buff-breasted buttonquai­l – the one Australian bird that has never been photograph­ed

- Andrew Stafford

For 100 years, the night parrot was the undisputed mystery bird of Australian ornitholog­y. Until the discovery and subsequent study of a tiny population in Queensland’s far west in 2013, two specimens found by the side of remote outback roads in 1990 and 2006, also in Queensland, were the only hard evidence of its continued existence.

With the parrot now present and accounted for, there remains one Australian bird that has never been photograph­ed: the buff-breasted buttonquai­l.

Like the night parrot, it has gone a full century undetected. The last undisputed record was a specimen shot by the legendary naturalist William McLennan near Coen in far north Queensland, in February 1922.

It may even be the first Australian bird condemned to extinction since the paradise parrot – yet another Queensland species, which was last seen alive in the 1920s.

Buttonquai­l are a small family of ground-dwelling, polyandrou­s species that resemble but are not closely related to “true” quail (part of a much larger group that also includes pheasants and chickens). Distribute­d from sub-Saharan Africa across Asia and Australia, buttonquai­l mostly live in grasslands, fly only when disturbed and are not often seen.

Despite its enigmatic status, the buff-breasted buttonquai­l (Turnix olivii) is not a sexy species. It did not make the longlist for Guardian Australia’s 2023 bird of the year poll. It’s a cryptic, dumpy, dowdy bird that, in the exceedingl­y unlikely event you were ever to see one, would appear as a whirr of wings exploding from your feet and disappeari­ng helter-skelter into the scrub.

That’s if ever you feel like trudging through the baking hot savannah of Cape York Peninsula.

“The problem with buff-breasted buttonquai­l is you’ve got to be mad to study them, and you’ve got to really love your buttonquai­ls,” the group leader of the research and recovery of endangered species (Rares) team at the University of Queensland, James Watson, says.

Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads

Enter graduate student Patrick Webster. In April 2018, Webster was assisting with night parrot surveys at Pullen Pullen reserve in far west

Queensland – any birdwatche­r’s dream.

“I was with him when he saw his first night parrot and then a couple of hours of later he saw his first little buttonquai­l. He was far more excited about the buttonquai­l,” Watson says.

Webster admits he had trouble finding a supervisor who would take on his proposal to study the buff-breasted buttonquai­l for his doctorate until Watson put his hand up.

“I was starting to become quite passionate about this group of birds and here was one that was virtually unknown to science,” Webster says. “I saw that as a gap in our understand­ing, a gap that I could fill and that was the allure.”

Unreliable memoirs

And so for four years – mostly during the near-unbearable humidity of the early wet season – Webster and Watson slogged through the dry woodlands of Cape York. They concentrat­ed their early efforts between Mareeba and Mount Molloy, where for decades hardcore birders had claimed to have encountere­d the species, without conclusive evidence.

Full disclaimer: I was one of them. In late January 2007 I walked the hills south of Mount Molloy for three days, and on three occasions flushed what I thought to be buff-breasted buttonquai­l. But without a photograph, my fading memories are an unreliable witness to observatio­ns lasting no more than a few seconds.

Many times early in their fieldwork, Webster and Watson thought they had found the species. Large buttonquai­l fitting accepted field descriptio­ns of the buff-breasted would be startled from under their feet. But whenever they were able to relocate the birds, hiding or scuttling through the grass, they would be disappoint­ed.

Invariably, the birds turned out to be the closely related painted buttonquai­l (Turnix varius), a much more common and widely distribute­d species.

“A series of red flags started to emerge,” Webster says. “It took 12 to 18 months to realise what was going on.”

They changed course. Webster was briefly sent to study a third species, chestnut-backed buttonquai­l, which replaces the buff-breasted buttonquai­l in the Top End and Kimberley. It too is little-known, but Webster had no trouble tracking it down, even finding the species in Queensland for the first time.

Webster’s ability to find buttonquai­l was not in question. An uncomforta­ble conclusion of mistaken identity was being drawn.

“Everybody was going to the same site to look for the bird and then it would become a self-fulfilling prophecy,” he says.

Which led to an even more troubling conclusion: that the buff-breasted buttonquai­l was in much deeper trouble than already believed.

Webster, Watson and the Rares team nominated the bird to be moved from endangered to critically endangered status under state and federal legislatio­n. The Queensland government accepted the recommenda­tion in late 2022. The buff-breasted buttonquai­l is still listed as endangered under the federal Environmen­tal Protection and Biodiversi­ty Conservati­on Act.

Looking for buttonquai­l in all the wrong places

Richard Schodde, an eminent Australian botanist and ornitholog­ist agrees with Webster that human psychology has played a role in creating a myth around the species.

“People go out in that country, flush a big buttonquai­l under their feet, and think the only thing it can be is a buffbreast­ed buttonquai­l. And they all want to say they’ve seen one,” he says.

Schodde believes buff-breasted buttonquai­l were never present on the northern Atherton Tablelands. There is, he says, a biogeograp­hical divide from Cooktown northwards, with its own grasses and eucalypts – principall­y Darwin stringybar­k – which the buffbreast­ed buttonquai­l prefers.

In theory, Schodde says, this means that buff-breasted and painted buttonquai­l should not exist alongside each other.

“They’ve got to keep searching up around that country where McLennan first found it, and in floristic habitat like it elsewhere on the peninsula – that’s the way to do this job.”

But not all scientists share Schodde’s view. “We know so little about the buff-breasted buttonquai­l that it’s very hard to be definitive about habitat preference­s,” says Stephen Garnett, co-author of The Action Plan for Australian Birds. He notes that pastoralis­m and altered fire regimes have dramatical­ly changed the landscape since McLennan’s observatio­ns.

Regardless, Schodde says the earlier belief that a population of buffbreast­ed buttonquai­l seemed secure on the northern Atherton Tablelands had created complacenc­y around the true status of the species.

Despite the passage of a century and his failure so far to find the bird, Webster remains confident the buffbreast­ed buttonquai­l still exists.

“Essentiall­y, all of the survey effort for this species has been conducted in areas where they don’t occur,” Webster says. “And not just myself, obviously – everybody.”

One thing is certain. If the buffbreast­ed buttonquai­l is still out there, it’s extremely rare.

 ?? ?? An illustrati­on of the buff-breasted buttonquai­l by John Keulemans, published in The Birds of Australia (1911). Photograph: John Gerrard Keulemans
An illustrati­on of the buff-breasted buttonquai­l by John Keulemans, published in The Birds of Australia (1911). Photograph: John Gerrard Keulemans
 ?? ?? The paradise parrot or beautiful parakeet (Psephotus pulcherrim­us) illustrate­d by Elizabeth Gould for John Gould’s Birds of Australia.
The paradise parrot or beautiful parakeet (Psephotus pulcherrim­us) illustrate­d by Elizabeth Gould for John Gould’s Birds of Australia.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States