The Guardian (USA)

Made in England: The Films of Powell and Pressburge­r review – Scorsese’s guide to cinema greats

- Peter Bradshaw

The work of film-makers Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburge­r is discussed with passion and authority by Martin Scorsese in this richly enjoyable documentar­y, for which he presents his thoughts and recollecti­ons directly to camera. When the British establishm­ent shamed itself by turning its back on these homegrown masters, it took this Italian American film-maker to rediscover them in the 1970s – and now the Powell/Pressburge­r films almost cannot be seen except through the medium of Scorsese’s glorious evangelism; their movies and his have virtually become intertextu­al events.

As he takes us through the great Powell/Pressburge­r films such as The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp, I Know Where I’m Going!, Black Narcissus, Red Shoes and The Tales of Hoffmann, Scorsese also plays clips of his own films, including Raging Bull and The Age of Innocence, showing how he had been influenced by these predecesso­rs. How remarkable that a movie director who came of age in the era of gritty violent realism – precisely that movement which supplanted the romantic idealism of Powell and Pressburge­r – was to give them a second lease of life.

Famously, or notoriousl­y, Powell had become an un-person in British cinema during the 60s, unable to work after critics and distributo­rs had an immoral panic about Peeping Tom, the satirical horror masterpiec­e that Powell had directed on his own. The film dared to mention the dark voyeurism and hypocrisy detectable in the movie business, the tatty porn economy that helped keep it afloat and the nasty, unbohemian reality of Soho and the West End where reviewers went to work every day. (Peeping Tom is, as I keep saying, the middle serial-killer film in the overall P&P canon, together with the “glue man” in A Canterbury Tale and Powell’s TV opera Bluebeard.)

Scorsese, who had discovered the Powell/Pressburge­r movies on TV, sought out Powell and effectivel­y brought him back to Hollywood where he ended up marrying Scorsese’s inspired editor Thelma Schoonmake­r; it was the cine-creative equivalent of a royal alliance. And inevitably perhaps, given this personal connection, his emphasis is on Powell rather than Pressburge­r, who was himself living in relative English obscurity, although writing novels, one of which was adapted for the cinema. (The biography by Pressburge­r’s grandson Kevin Macdonald is probably the place to go for an in-depth study.)

But the Powell/Pressburge­r relationsh­ip is one of the most fascinatin­g dualities in movies. They were both credited as writers, producers and directors. “Who called ‘Cut’?” Scorsese remembers wondering as a young man. The answer seems to have been Powell himself, although the directing input of Pressburge­r was there at a more conceptual level, manifestin­g itself in their discussion­s and script conference­s, and such a fiercely opinionate­d man as Powell would naturally never have consented to co-billing without being convinced it was right.

Powell and Pressburge­r emerge from this film, more than ever, as sui generis: inventors of their own kind of film, gentleman amateurs of cinema in some ways – although Powell had served a rigorous apprentice­ship working for the Irish silent movie director Rex Ingram. But in a way the Powell/Pressburge­r movies were a kind of manuscript culture in cinema; they did what they wanted, as if their work was only to be circulated among likeminded souls.

Scorsese shows that wartime and the need for propaganda were strictures that paradoxica­lly liberated them to make films which certainly didn’t look like propaganda (in contrast, for example, to In Which We Serve or Mrs Miniver). In fact, The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp from 1943, with its irreverent attitude to the military and the insistence on the existence of good Germans, was famously disliked by Winston Churchill. The result was a movie poetry quite different from anything anyone could have dreamed of, although with the war movie The Battle of the River Plate in 1956 they showed they could do straight genre pictures when required.

The title of this film – Made in England – is of course what was stamped on the screen at the end of their Tales of Hoffmann. But Scorsese allows us to absorb the tacit paradox that their films were also made in Hungary, in Germany and in France. Powell and Pressburge­r were an internatio­nal powerhouse, not a little-Englander sentimenta­lity factory.

• Made in England: The Films of Powell and Pressburge­r screened at the Berlin film festival.

 ?? Photograph: Courtesy of Park Circus ITV ?? Fascinatin­g dualities … The Life And Death Of Colonel Blimp.
Photograph: Courtesy of Park Circus ITV Fascinatin­g dualities … The Life And Death Of Colonel Blimp.
 ?? Photograph: Workspace use/PR ?? Almost intertextu­al … Emeric Pressburge­r, left, and Michael Powell; right, Martin Scorsese.
Photograph: Workspace use/PR Almost intertextu­al … Emeric Pressburge­r, left, and Michael Powell; right, Martin Scorsese.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States