The Guardian (USA)

The longer Biden enables Netanyahu, the more his presidency is at risk

- Mohamad Bazzi

Benjamin Netanyahu announced his plan on Friday for postwar Gaza, revealing that Israel would maintain indefinite military control and create “buffer zones” in the territory. The Israeli prime minister is planning a military occupation, dressed up under a vague civilian administra­tion made up of Palestinia­ns who would be willing to collaborat­e, once Israel ends its devastatin­g assault on Gaza. Netanyahu’s plan is slap in the face to Joe Biden, who has insisted for months that the US won’t accept an Israeli military occupation or attempts to seize parts of the Gaza Strip.

Since Biden announced his unconditio­nal support for Israel after the brutal Hamas attacks on 7 October – embracing Netanyahu in a bear hug during a visit to Tel Aviv – Netanyahu has openly defied Israel’s most important ally and paid no price for it. Each week, Biden and his top aides vent at Netanyahu and his handling of the conflict, but they continue to provide US diplomatic cover and weapons shipments that allow Israel to sustain its war.

Last week, days before Netanyahu announced his postwar plan, Washington vetoed the latest UN security council resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. It was the third time the US has used its veto to protect Israel from a UN resolution since October – and only Britain abstained on the latest measure, while the 13 other council members supported it.

A day later, on 21 February, the US once again stood nearly alone to defend Israel’s decades-long occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. A top state department official argued at the internatio­nal court of justice in The Hague that Israel’s “very real security needs” must be considered before the court calls for its immediate withdrawal from occupied Palestinia­n territory. The UN general assembly asked the world court in 2022 to review the legality of Israeli policies in the occupied territorie­s, and more than 50 states presented their views at the week-long hearings at The Hague. Only a handful of countries – including the US, Britain and Hungary – sided with Israel.

The court will take months to issue its decision, and while it doesn’t have enforcemen­t powers, a ruling that the occupation is illegal would further isolate Israel and its internatio­nal supporters like the US and UK. The ruling could also pave the way for states to impose sanctions against Israel. As Israel becomes more of an internatio­nal pariah due to its occupation and subjugatio­n of Palestinia­ns, it will be more difficult for Washington to lecture its adversarie­s, especially Russia and China, on upholding internatio­nal law.

Biden, a supposed foreign policy pragmatist, doesn’t seem bothered that the US is one of the few states that continues to wholeheart­edly sustain Israel’s war on Gaza. In fact, Biden has staked his political future on his support for Netanyahu and Israel – and Biden is losing. In this year’s presidenti­al election, where he will most likely face Donald Trump once again, Biden has already lost support among young progressiv­es, Black and Arab American voters, who are all rightfully angry at his refusal to restrain Israel.

Biden allies are raising the alarm that he could lose Michigan, a swing state with substantia­l Black, Arab and Muslim American voting blocs, because of his Middle East policies. Congressma­n Ro Khanna, a Biden supporter and progressiv­e Democrat from California who has tried to mediate between Biden’s campaign and Michigan Democrats, warned his team this week: “We cannot win Michigan with status quo policy.”

And yet Biden refuses to use the significan­t leverage he has to force Netanyahu into accepting a permanent ceasefire: aside from providing diplomatic cover at the UN security council and other internatio­nal bodies, the US is the biggest supplier of arms to Israel, providing $3.8bn in military aid per year. Without a steady supply of US weapons since October, Israel would have run out of bombs to drop on Gaza. After the Hamas attacks, Biden rushed to ask Congress to provide $14.3bn in additional arms and security assistance to Israel. That package has been stalled in Congress, but that hasn’t stopped the Biden administra­tion from rushing weapons shipments to Israel, including tens of thousands of artillery shells and other munitions which the state department approved under emergency measures that bypassed congressio­nal approval.

The Biden administra­tion has consistent­ly underplaye­d the leverage it has over Israel and Netanyahu. “I think that sometimes people pretend that the United States of America has a magic wand that it can wave to make any situation in the world roll out in exactly the way that we would want it to and that is never the case,” Matthew Miller, the state department spokespers­on, said at a press conference on 12 February.

Miller’s flippant comment raises an important question: if Biden can’t use billions of dollars in military aid – and

 ?? Photograph: Leah Millis/Reuters ?? ‘Rather than using its influence over Netanyahu, the Biden administra­tion instead is trying to show Americans that the president is exasperate­d with the Israeli prime minister.’
Photograph: Leah Millis/Reuters ‘Rather than using its influence over Netanyahu, the Biden administra­tion instead is trying to show Americans that the president is exasperate­d with the Israeli prime minister.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States