The Guardian (USA)

Exclusive: Youth coach facing assault charge was cleared by third-party firm investigat­ing Hockey Canada abuse claims

- Matthew Hall

A youth hockey coach is set to appear in a Canadian court charged with assaulting a child after being cleared of abuse for the same incident by Hockey Canada’s “independen­t third party” that investigat­es abuse within the sport.

The charge laid by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police – the country’s national police service – demonstrat­es a disparity in standards between police investigat­ions into abuse and internal civil investigat­ions managed by sports organizati­ons.

Also of note is that Sport Complaints – the independen­t third party that investigat­ed the case on behalf of Hockey Canada – did not report the alleged abuse to law enforcemen­t. The incident occurred in the province of Alberta where the Child, Youth, and Family Enhancemne­t Act requires concerns of child sexual exploitati­on or abuse or neglect to be reported to authoritie­s. According to Hockey Canada’s Maltreatme­nt, Bullying, and Harrasment Treatment and Protection and Prevention Policy, “any Participan­t engaged in a Hockey Canada activity, who has reasonable grounds to suspect that a Minor Participan­t is or may be suffering or may have suffered from any form of child abuse, has a legal obligation to immediatel­y report the suspicion.”

The criminal charge of assault, scheduled to go to trial in an Alberta court on Wednesday, relates to two incidents in 2023 involving an adult coach and a seven-year-old child. The Guardian is declining to name the parties involved as the charge involves a minor.

Sport Complaints cleared the coach of any allegation­s of abuse in its official report of the incidents, instead describing the two incidents now subject to the criminal charge as “inappropri­ate” and taking place in a “playful environmen­t”.

The Sport Complaints decision to clear the coach of any allegation­s came after an investigat­or interviewe­d the child via Microsoft Teams, a method contrary to how investigat­ors trained to interact with children would conduct an interview.

“If the parent doesn’t make a report to police then certainly the [investigat­ing] organizati­on should make a report to law enforcemen­t immediatel­y,” said Teresa Huizar, CEO of Washington DC-based National Children’s Alliance (NCA), an organizati­on that assists law enforcemen­t in bestpracti­ce investigat­ions of child abuse.

“The actual criminal investigat­ion should take precedence over what is happening within the sport. That ensures kids are getting justice and not getting retraumati­zed and not having to tell their story over and over again. But it also ensures that [the sport] isn’t giving improper privilege over community safety and is holding offenders accountabl­e.”

Hockey Canada’s “duty to report” policy states any personnel or partner “who has reasonable grounds to suspect that a participan­t is or may be suffering or may have suffered from emotional, [or] physical abuse … shall immediatel­y report to the local child protection agency and/or the local police detachment”.

Hockey Canada said in a statement to the Guardian that it “cannot comment on how the ITP handled a particular complaint” but “we can comment on the Maltreatme­nt Complaint Management Policy that determines the work of the ITP, and the ITP’s responsibi­lity to report matters to police.

“More specifical­ly, Schedule A of the Maltreatme­nt Complaint Management Policy describes the Investigat­ion Procedure. Within Schedule A, Article 9 states “Should the investigat­or find that there are possible instances of offence under the Criminal Code or behaviour which might constitute child abuse under the relevant provincial/territoria­l legislatio­n, the investigat­or shall advise the Complainan­t and the ITP that it must refer the matter to the police.” This means that ITP-appointed investigat­ors are required to determine if the criteria for referring the matter to the police/ law enforcemen­t are met and they then inform the Complainan­t and the ITP accordingl­y.”

According to a witness statement seen by the Guardian made to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in September 2023, the coach allegedly placed the then seven-year-old upside down in a locker room garbage can. The incident occurred after the child allegedly threw a puck in the direction of the coach.

The same statement to police alleges a second incident when the coach “aggressive­ly grabbed” the child by his helmet cage, pulled his head forcefully forward and shook the child’s head from side to side and up and down. “His helmet half came off and his face mask/ cage was up by his nose,” according to the statement. That incident allegedly occurred after the child shot a puck in the direction of the coach.

The Sport Complaints investigat­ion into the incidents stated that the coach “denied any physical abuse, such as head jerking, or that the helmet ended halfway up [the child’s] head”. The coach said he “just put his fingers in [the child’s] mask cage and that the entire incident took place between 10-15 seconds.”

According to the report, the child told the investigat­or during the video interview that he did not recall the incident and that the coach did not hurt him.

“There is 40 years of science behind how children need to be interviewe­d,” said the NCA’s Huizar. “There is specialize­d forensics training that is available not only in the US but elsewhere and those models have the same underlying principles. They align with the scientific evidence about how children’s memory works, the language that needs to be used, how to ask questions in a non-leading way and that training is absolutely essential.

“When kids, especially very young children, are being questioned improperly they can think that they must have not answered a question right because the person keeps asking them questions again. Kids will guess what the adult is looking for. On serious criminal matters the interviews really must be done by trained forensic interviewe­rs.”

The Sport Complaints investigat­ion found that the ice hockey coach did not engage in verbal or physical abuse or contravene any policy of Hockey Canada, Hockey Alberta, or the Spruce Grove Minor Hockey Associatio­n, where the incidents are alleged to have taken place.

Police took a different view of events with officers obtaining a statement from the alleged victim at a child advocacy center – a specialist facility staffed with officers from local and national police forces, prosecutor­s, and staff from provincial health and children’s services, specializi­ng in managing abuse cases that involve minors.

“Children require a developmen­tally appropriat­e, legally sound, way of approachin­g these conversati­ons,” said Huizar whose organizati­on supported agencies who worked with the FBI investigat­ing the disgraced US gymnastics team doctor

 ?? Photograph: Eliot J Schechter/NHLI/Getty ?? A youth hockey coach is set to appear in a Canadian court charged with assaulting a child after being cleared of abuse for the same incident by Hockey Canada’s ‘independen­t third party’ that investigat­es abuse within the sport.
Images
Photograph: Eliot J Schechter/NHLI/Getty A youth hockey coach is set to appear in a Canadian court charged with assaulting a child after being cleared of abuse for the same incident by Hockey Canada’s ‘independen­t third party’ that investigat­es abuse within the sport. Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States