The Macomb Daily

Preservati­ve used in popular foods may harm the immune system, per study

- By Olga Naidenko, Ph.D. Olga Naidenko, Ph.D., is vice president for science investigat­ions and lead author of the new study on TBHQ. The Environmen­tal Working Group is a nonprofit, nonpartisa­n organizati­on that empowers people to live healthier lives in

A food preservati­ve used to prolong the shelf life of Pop-Tarts, Rice Krispies Treats, Cheez-Its and almost 1,250 other popular processed foods may harm the immune system, according to a new peer-reviewed study by Environmen­tal Working Group.

For the study, published this week in the Internatio­nal Journal of Environmen­tal Research and Public Health, EWG researcher­s used data from the Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s Toxicity Forecaster, called ToxCast, to assess the health hazards of the most common chemicals added to food, as well as the manmade “forever chemicals” known as PFAS (Perand polyfluoro­alkyl substances), which can migrate to food from packaging.

EWG’s analysis of ToxCast data showed that the preservati­ve tert-butylhydro­quinone (TBHQ), has been found to harm the immune system both in both animal tests and in nonanimal tests known as high-throughput in vitro toxicology testing. This finding is of particular concern during the coronaviru­s pandemic.

The pandemic has focused public and scientific attention on environmen­tal factors that can impact the immune system. Before the pandemic, chemicals that may harm the immune system’s defense against infection or cancer did not receive sufficient attention from public health agencies. To protect public health, this must change.

TBHQ

TBHQ is a preservati­ve that is pervasive in processed foods. It has been used in foods for many decades and serves no function besides increasing a product’s shelf life. Using new nonanimal test results from ToxCast, EWG found that TBHQ affected immune cell proteins at doses similar to those that cause harm in traditiona­l studies. Earlier studies have found that TBHQ might influence how well flu vaccines work and may be linked to a rise in food allergies.

PFAS

Using ToxCast, EWG analyzed all publicly available studies that show how PFAS migrate to food from packaging materials or processing equipment. This is the first known compilatio­n of available research on PFAS migration from packaging to food. In 2017, nationwide tests showed that many fast-food chains used food wrappers, bags and boxes coated with highly fluorinate­d chemicals.

Human epidemiolo­gical studies show that PFAS suppresses immune function and decreases vaccine efficacy. Recently published research has also found a link between high levels of PFAS in the blood and the severity of COVID-19.

Surprising­ly, for most PFAS, the ToxCast results did not match previous animal and human test data.

This illustrate­s the limitation­s of this new chemical testing method. More research is needed to understand how PFAS harm the immune system.

Food Chemicals Regulation

The Food and Drug Administra­tion’s approach to the regulation of food additives does not consider the latest science on the health harms of additives that may be legally added to processed foods manufactur­ed in the U.S. Last year, EWG published Food Additives State of the Science, which highlighte­d additives known to increase the risk of cancer, harm the nervous system and disrupt the body’s hormonal balance.

Chemicals linked to health harms can be legally added to packaged foods because the FDA frequently allows food manufactur­ers to determine which chemicals are safe. Additives like TBHQ were approved by the FDA decades ago, and the agency does not consider new science to reassess the safety of food chemicals.

“Food manufactur­ers have no incentive to change their formulas,” said Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs at EWG. “Too often, the FDA allows the food and chemical industry to determine which ingredient­s are safe for consumptio­n. Our research shows how important it is that the FDA take a second look at these ingredient­s and test all food chemicals for safety.”

Less Toxic Food Preservati­ves

Processed foods can be made without these potentiall­y harmful ingredient­s, so shoppers should read labels carefully. TBHQ is often, though not always, listed on the ingredient label. It will be listed if it has been added to the product during manufactur­ing. But it can also be used in food packaging, particular­ly plastic packaging, in which case it may migrate to food.

EWG’s Food Scores database helps consumers find products made with healthier alternativ­es, and our Healthy Living app allows shoppers to scan products while in stores to choose a better option.

EWG recommends that immunotoxi­city testing be prioritize­d for chemicals in food and food contact materials in order to protect public health from their potential harm to the immune system.

EWG also calls on the FDA to close the regulatory loophole that allows potentiall­y unsafe food additives to remain on the market. The FDA should also promptly review additives like TBHQ to reflect new science.

 ?? GRAPHIC COURTESY THE ENVIRONMEN­TAL WORKING GROUP ??
GRAPHIC COURTESY THE ENVIRONMEN­TAL WORKING GROUP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States