The Maui News - Weekender

Redskins to have ‘thorough review’ of name amid race debate; Indians also looking into change

- By STEPHEN WHYNO

WASHINGTON — The Washington Redskins began a “thorough review” of their name Friday, a significan­t step toward moving on from what experts and advocates call a “dictionary-defined racial slur.”

Even though owner Dan Snyder had shown no willingnes­s to change the name since buying the team in 1999, the recent national conversati­on on race has renewed opposition to the name and prompted sponsors to speak up. With support from the NFL, it may finally lead to a new moniker for the long-struggling, storied franchise with long-ago Super Bowl success.

“In the last few weeks, we have had ongoing discussion­s with Dan, and we are supportive of this important step,” Commission­er Roger Goodell said.

In a statement, the team said recent events around the U.S. and feedback from the community prompted the formal review.

“This process allows the team to take into account not only the proud tradition and history of the franchise but also input from our alumni, the organizati­on, sponsors, the National Football League and the local community it is proud to represent on and off the field,” Snyder said.

Native American advocacy groups have tried for decades to force a change, and a peer-reviewed

UC Berkeley study released earlier this year revealed 67 percent of those surveyed who strongly identify as Native agreed or strongly agreed the name was offensive. The death of George Floyd in Minnesota and other examples of police brutality against Black people in the U.S. sparked protests worldwide and changes to various brands considered racially insensitiv­e.

Asked last month about the name, a spokesman said the team had no comment. But this week marked a possible sea change on the issue with investors writing to FedEx, PepsiCo and other sponsors hoping they would influence change.

FedEx was the first to act publicly. The title sponsor of the team’s stadium in Landover, Md., FedEx said Thursday, “We have communicat­ed to the team in Washington our request that they change the team name.” FedEx paid $205 million in 1999 for the naming rights to the stadium.

On Thursday night, Nike appeared to remove all Redskins gear from its online store. Nike said Friday it has shared its concerns with the NFL over the name and is “pleased to see the team taking a first step towards change.”

PepsiCo, a sponsor since 2017, expressed a similar sentiment and said, “We believe it is time for a change.” Sponsor Bank of America said it has “encouraged the team to change the name” and welcomed the organizati­on’s review.

Coach Ron Rivera, who said in a recent radio interview now is not the time to discuss the name, called it “an issue of personal importance.” Rivera, who is of Mexican and Puerto Rican descent and is the only Hispanic head coach currently in the NFL, added he’d work closely with Snyder during the process.

“There is no reason not to immediatel­y announce that the team is changing the mascot, since any real review will lead to the inevitable conclusion that the deeply offensive

and racist name of Washington’s NFL team must go now,” said Oneida Indian Nation Representa­tive Ray Halbritter, leader of the “Change the Mascot” campaign. “Dan Snyder can stand on the right side of history and create a new, positive legacy for his team, or instead continue embracing a bigoted slur that denigrates Native Americans and people of color.”

Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said recently the name was an “obstacle” to the team building a stadium in the District.

The current lease at FedEx Field expires in 2027, and the old RFK Stadium site in Washington is one of several options for the team’s new headquarte­rs, along with locations in Maryland and Virginia.

In Major League Baseball, the Cleveland Indians echoed the Redskins’ announceme­nt Friday, saying they will review their long-debated nickname which has been in place for 105 years.

“We are committed to making a positive impact in our community and embrace our responsibi­lity to advance social justice and equality,” the team said in a statement that came just hours after the Redskins’ announceme­nt. “Our organizati­on fully recognizes our team name is among the most visible ways in which we connect with the community.”

There have been previous efforts to get the Indians to rename themselves. In 2018, the team removed the contentiou­s Chief Wahoo logo from their game jerseys and caps. The grinning, red-faced mascot, however, is still present on merchandis­e that can be purchased at Progressiv­e Field and other team shops in Northeast Ohio.

Nothing has been decided, but the Indians’ decision to at least discuss the possibilit­y of a name change is new. There will certainly be backlash from some Cleveland fans, but the team is sensitive to doing the right thing in these changing times.

“We have had ongoing discussion­s organizati­onally on these issues,” the Indians said. “The recent social unrest in our community and our country has only underscore­d the need for us to keep improving as an organizati­on on issues of social justice. With that in mind, we are committed to engaging our community and appropriat­e stakeholde­rs to determine the best path forward with regard to our team name.”

 ?? AP file photo ?? Washington coach Ron Rivera, who said in a recent radio interview now is not the time to discuss the team’s name, called it “an issue of personal importance.”
AP file photo Washington coach Ron Rivera, who said in a recent radio interview now is not the time to discuss the team’s name, called it “an issue of personal importance.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States