The Mendocino Beacon

‘Woke’ crowd needs to go back to sleep

- By Jim Shields

This past Tuesday, May 23, the Board of Supervisor­s unanimousl­y ok’d a “streamline­d” Weed Ordinance intended to break the logjam of local permit applicants who’ve been stuck in-place virtually forever, or at least since the original unworkable, failed ordinance was approved over six years ago.

The County has something like $17.5 million from the state’s Local Jurisdicti­on Assistance Grant Program (LJAGP), created in 2021 to provide funding to local government­s that have problems transition­ing weed cultivator­s from provisiona­l cannabis license status into state annual licenses.

Needless to repeat again but the County’s Cannabis Ordinance has been fraught with problems from its inception.

In a letter that was included in documents and reports accompanyi­ng the proposed amended ordinance, the California Department of Cannabis Control stated:

“The Department is prepared to collaborat­ively engage with the County to address longstandi­ng challenges confrontin­g the County’s legacy operators and California’s legal market. This includes assessing inefficien­cies under existing procedures for compliance with the California Environmen­tal Quality Act (CEQA), and identifyin­g a way by which the Department could (with the County’s assistance) lead revitalize­d efforts to ensure timely compliance with CEQA for provisiona­l license holders. Likewise, streamlini­ng local permit decisions will provide greater clarity, sooner, to support enforcemen­t of state and local law.”

I’ve heard from a number of pot farmers who’ve studied the new ordinance and believe it may prove successful in accomplish­ing the long delayed objective of actual issuing cultivatio­n permits to applicants.

We’ll see.

As others have also observed, I find it amusing that a 42-page “urgency ordinance” amending the original Mendocino Cannabis Cultivatio­n Ordinance is deemed “streamline­d.”

Something not so amusing was a totally bogus claim by the spokesman for the county’s main pot lobbying organizati­on, that the proposed ordinance’s reference to the “black market” was racially “harmful rhetoric.”

What a load of crap. According to Michael Katz, of the Mendocino Cannabis Associatio­n, “We request the substituti­on of the phrase ‘unregulate­d market’ or ‘unlicensed market’ in place of the currently included phrase ‘black market.’ The term ‘black market’ contribute­s, whether intentiona­lly or not, to structures of white supremacy and institutio­nal racism, and we are confident that the Board would not want to support that kind of harmful rhetoric.”

These kinds of false assertions, based on not even the thinnest thread of empirical evidence or historical fact, are the stock-in-trade of the nutsy “Woke” crowd.

At best, such fabricated and misleading assertions trivialize true racial justice issues, and at worst, foster disharmony and suspicion where none exists.

You’ll find absolutely nothing in the etymology or lexicology of the phrase “black market” that even tangential­ly or indirectly hints at anything remotely related to racism or white supremacy.

As a degreed political scientist and historian, I can say without any fear of contradict­ion that all the research I’ve done found that the roots of the phrase solely and only describes the illegal trade that takes place in secret, or in the dark, hence the name “black market.” Because black-market trade occurs “off the books,” so to speak, it represents a whole sector of a country’s economy that cannot accurately be measured.

Universall­y, standard dictionari­es define a black market as an “undergroun­d economy, or a shadow economy, or a clandestin­e market, or a series of transactio­ns that has some aspect of illegality or is characteri­zed by noncomplia­nce with an institutio­nal set of rules or regulatory framework. Examples include the illegal drug trade, prostituti­on (where prohibited), illegal currency transactio­ns, and human traffickin­g.”

Other scholarly sources discuss because “tax evasion or participat­ion in a black market activity is illegal, participan­ts attempt to hide their behavior from the government or regulatory authority. Cash is the preferred medium of exchange in illegal transactio­ns since cash transactio­ns are less easily traced. Common motives for operating in black markets are to trade contraband, avoid taxes and regulation­s, or skirt price controls or rationing.”

As someone who is a veteran of the Civil Rights movement, as someone who as a young unionist supported and worked with Cesar Chavez’s UFW, as someone who resigned from his original, corrupt union and with others founded an internatio­nal, rank and file independen­t airline union that was recognized a “rainbow union,” I deeply resent Woke charlatans like Katz who don’t know what the hell they’re talking about, yet chatter on incessantl­y.

Paraphrasi­ng a favorite old saying, “While everyone is entitled to act foolish, Mr. Katz abuses the privilege.”

Enough said.

Cannabis factoids

Everyone knows that cannabis use is legal in California. However, cities and counties can prohibit cannabis cultivatio­n, as well as businesses, like retail, manufactur­ing, and distributi­on. As a result, the state’s landscape is a patchwork where cannabis-related activities are either legal or prohibited.

I had always assumed that a majority of the state’s cities and counties allowed the full range of cannabis activities. I discovered that my assumption was far off the mark.

According to the state Department of Cannabis Control, two-thirds of cities and counties ban all things pot. Here’s the breakdown:

• 69 percent cities and counties prohibit cultivatio­n.

• 61 percent of cities and counties do not allow any retail cannabis business.

• 66 percent of cities and counties prohibit manufactur­ing.

• 66 percent of cities and counties prohibit distributi­on.

Mendocino County and its four cities are among a distinct minority that allows all weed related activities. Jim Shields is the Mendocino County Observer’s editor and publisher, observer@pacific.net, the long-time district manager of the Laytonvill­e County Water District, and is also chairman of the Laytonvill­e Area Municipal Advisory Council. Listen to his radio program “This and That” every Saturday at noon on KPFN 105.1 FM, also streamed live: http://www.kpfn.org

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States