The Mercury News Weekend

Democrats reject bill targeting traffickin­g

Abortion dispute threatens effort to protect victims

- By Erica Werner

WASHINGTON — Republican­s sought a way out of an abortion dispute that has blocked anti-traffickin­g legislatio­n, but Democrats immediatel­y rejected their proposal and voted for a third straight day to stop the bill from moving forward.

The developmen­ts Thursday deepened a Senate stalemate over the once widely popular bill to help the victims of human traffickin­g.

The impasse has also stalled confirmati­on of President Barack Obama’s attorney general nominee.

The bill’s main GOP author, Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, unveiled a proposal on the Senate floor that would change the prohibitio­n on abortion spending in a proposed victims’ fund. Democrats have complained that the prohibitio­n goes further than current law.

Cornyn said his proposal would make the victims’ fund subject to the same abortion restrictio­ns that have been included for decades in Congress’ annual spending bills.

“If we can’t get to ‘yes’ on a human traffickin­g bill, then heaven help us,” Cornyn said as he described what he hoped would be a compromise that could win support from Democrats.

Within minutes, Democrats rejected his plan. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said there could be no compromise on the traffickin­g bill short of entirely removing a provision that prevents spending for abortions in most cases.

“We want that language out,” Feinstein told reporters. “There’s a compromise possible: Take it out.”

Annual abortion restrictio­ns in current law apply to tax dollars, whereas the victims’ fund envisioned by the traffickin­g legislatio­n would be made up of fees paid by criminals. Democrats say applying restrictio­ns on abortion spending to that new pot of money is an expansion they can’t accept.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States