The Mercury News Weekend

Presentati­on sees donations surge

Catholic girls school accused of ignoring sexual abuse allegation­s benefiting from crowdfundi­ng campaign

- By John Woolfolk jwoolfolk@bayareanew­sgroup.com

Despite allegation­s that administra­tors ignored sexual harassment and abuse complaints at a San Jose Catholic girls school, donors outraged by the accuser’s tactics have more than doubled their contributi­ons.

Presentati­on High School reported Thursday that the school raised more than $126,000 in its crowdfundi­ng campaign this week even as critics wrote school supporters urging them to withhold donations to pressure the school to investigat­e the allegation­s. That was more than twice last year’s $59,000 haul.

“It’s nice to see these misleading claims not only haven’t made adent in our reputation, theyhave encouraged people to stand up and fight the falsehoods by voting their conscience­s with their wallets,” Kristin Cooke Schneider, the school’s alumnae director, said in a statement. She said money raised will fund scholarshi­ps and other student programs at the prestigiou­s school, where tuition is nearly $20,000 a year.

But news of the surging donations came as critics leveled new charges Thursday that Presentati­on ignored “numerous sexual abuse allegation­s” about a former performing arts instructor who left in 2004.

The instructor was convicted on child molestatio­n and pornograph­y charges in 2014 while teaching at a private San Mateo school for children with learning disabiliti­es. He is now a registered sex offender. The critics allege that Presentati­on never reported that instructor to authoritie­s even “after his own admission” to Principal Mary Miller “that he had inappropri­ately fondled an underage student,” when he was teaching at Presentati­on High.

School spokesman Sam Singer said in response that the school had done appropriat­e background checks before hiring the instructor and found no record of wrongdoing. He said he was unaware of anyone having any recollecti­on of such a complaint about the instructor, and called the accusation “specious and misleading,” noting no parent or victim was

identified.

A two- page letter to Presentati­on supporters from “Victims and Alumnae in support of Making Pres Safe for all students” asked “that you temporaril­y withhold your donations to PHS until they agree to that independen­t investigat­ion.” It listed statements published online from several women who claimed they reported abuse and were ignored.

Schneider said the letters “infuriated people who felt their privacy was invaded and that they were being harassed and bullied into withdrawin­g their support from school.”

Most donors on the school website are listed either just by name or with brief remarks of gratitude for Presentati­on. Donor Karen Strobach stated on the website, “With all the bad press and the anonymous, derogatory letters …I’m giving more to Pres this year than ever.” Singer said others were reluctant to speak publicly because “they get pummeled on social media.”

Maria Alderete, a 1988 Presentati­on graduate whose sister Kathryn Leehane wrote a newspaper article about alleged abuse by a language teacher in the 1990s, said the donor letter had “no bullying, no threatenin­g” or “hateful speech,” just “a statement of facts which have been corroborat­ed by multiple individual­s.”

Robert Allard, a lawyer representi­ng former students who have accused the school of failing to report their abuse claims to authoritie­s, said “we have no knowledge of any person being ‘ bullied’ or ‘ harassed’ in any way by members of our team.” He added that donor names were listed on the school’s website and those who received letters had publicly listed addresses.

“If the messaging is hard to hear, we apologize,” Allard said in a statement. “But we feel it’s necessary in order to prevent future severe trauma to Presentati­on students and their respective families.”

Presentati­on High, a parochial school of 830 girls establishe­d in 1962, has faced mounting criticism from some former students who say administra­tors mishandled their complaints of being sexually harassed or abused by teachers or staff over the last three decades.

After Leehane’s column appeared in the Washington Post in October about how the school handled her complaint from the 1990’s, other former students came forward to detail their own alleged abuse. That number has since grown to at least 20 hey claimed abuse from as many as eight former teachers or staff, one of whom has since died. The former students have detailed their complaints on a website, and garnered more than 6,600 signatures to an online petition demanding an independen­t investigat­ion into the school’s complaint handling.

Presentati­on has insisted it followed state law, which requires school officials to report suspected child abuse to police or a child protection agency, in responding to complaints. School officials have said they have no documentat­ion or recollecti­on of many of the complaints and that others were reported differentl­y at the time.

But the school has announced changes in how it will handle future complaints, and police have ac- knowledged they are looking into whether school officials properly reported past abuse allegation­s.

The accusation­s have sharply divided the school community. Principal Mary Miller in December thanked supporters “for the collective community outrage at the false, unfounded, misleading, and half-truths that have been slung at our school and me this fall.”

But some posters to the school’s Facebook page have vented their anger at the school, with comments like: “Their continued denial, victim shaming, and lack of responsibi­lity is disturbing.”

 ??  ?? Allard
Allard

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States