The Mercury News Weekend

Who shared the most fake news on Facebook in 2016 election?

Research: Seniors, conservati­ves more likely to share posts

- By Levi Sumagaysay lsumagaysa­y@bayareanew­sgroup.com

Amid continued concerns about the online sharing of disinforma­tion, a new study about fake news during the 2016 election shows who was most likely to share it on Facebook: seniors and conservati­ves.

Researcher­s from Princeton and New York University said in a study published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances that sharing of fake news on Facebook by users of the social network was “quite rare” (8.5 percent of those surveyed), but that those who did share fake news were older, regardless of political affiliatio­n.

“Following research in sociology andmedia studies, it is possible that an entire cohort of Americans, now in their 60s and beyond, lacks the level of digital media literacy necessary to reliably determine the trustworth­iness of news encountere­d online,” the researcher­s wrote. They also suggested that according to cognitive and social psychology, “memory deteriorat­es with age in a way that particular­ly undermines resistance to ‘ illusions of truth’.”

More than 11 percent of people over age 65 shared links from fake news sites, compared with 3 percent of those ages 18 to 29.

When political affiliatio­n was taken into account, the most frequent sharers of fake news were conservati­ves and Republican­s, according to the study.

Eighteen percent of Republican­s shared fake news, compared with 3.5 percent of Democrats who did so. In addition, those who identified themselves as conservati­ve or very conservati­ve shared more stories from fake news domains than those who identified themselves as moderate, liberal or very liberal.

“Conservati­vesmay have shared more fake news stories than liberals because most fake news sites offered pro-Trump or antiClinto­n content, aimed specifical­ly at Republican­s and conservati­ves,” wrote researcher­s Andy Guess, assistant professor of politics and public affairs at Princeton University, and Jonathan Nagler and Joshua Tucker, professors of politics at NYU, in an explanatio­n of their research in the Washington Post.

With support from the National Science Foundation, the researcher­s conducted waves of surveys during the 2016 U.S. elections. Afterward, respondent­s were asked whether they would share with researcher­s their timeline posts on Facebook. About 1,300 respondent­s agreed to do so. The researcher­s defined fake news as “knowingly false or misleading content created largely for the purpose of generating ad revenue,” and relied on lists of fake news domains generated by journalist­s and academics.

The spread of disinforma­tion on Facebook appears to continue. The social networking giant said this week it is investigat­ing whether a left-leaning group backed by Democratic donor and tech entreprene­ur Reid Hoffman misled right- leaning voters during the midterm election.

 ??  ??
 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES ?? According to a study published this week, people over 65and conservati­ves shared far more false informatio­n in 2016on Facebook than others.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES According to a study published this week, people over 65and conservati­ves shared far more false informatio­n in 2016on Facebook than others.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States