The Mercury News Weekend

Officials tout security of the election

Cybersecur­ity experts call it the most secure in American history

- By Eric Tucker and Frank Bajak

WASHINGTON >> A coalition of federal and state officials said Thursday that they have no evidence that votes were compromise­d or altered in last week’s presidenti­al election, rejecting unsubstant­iated claims of widespread fraud advanced by President Donald Trump and many of his supporters.

The statement from cybersecur­ity experts, which trumpeted the Nov. 3 election as the most secure in American history, amounted to the most direct repudiatio­n to date of Trump’s efforts to undermine the integrity of the contest. It echoed repeated assertions by election experts and state officials over the last week that the election unfolded smoothly without broad irregulari­ties.

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunit­ies for misinforma­tion about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too,” the statement said.

“When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

The statement was distribute­d by the Cybersecur­ity and Infrastruc­ture Security Agency, which spearheade­d federal election protection efforts. It was tweeted by the agency’s director, Chris Krebs, who just hours earlier had been the subject of a Reuters story that said he had told associates he expected to be fired by Trump. Krebs has been vocal on Twitter in repeatedly reassuring Americans that the election was

secure and that their votes would be counted.

“America, we have confidence in the security of your vote, you should, too,” he wrote.

The officials who signed the statement said they had no evidence that any voting system had deleted or lost votes, had changed votes, or was in any way compromise­d. They said all of the states with close results have paper records, which allows for the recounting of each ballot, if necessary, and for “the identifica­tion and correction of any mistakes or errors.”

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” the statement said.

The message is in stark contrast to Trump’s unsupporte­d claims of fraud and widespread problems that he insists could affect vote totals.

The issues Trump’s campaign and its allies have pointed to are typical in every election: problems with signatures, secrecy envelopes and postmarks on mail-in ballots, as well as the potential for a small number of ballots miscast or lost. With Democrat Joe Biden leading Trump by wide margins in key battlegrou­nd states, none of those issues would have any impact on the outcome of the election.

Trump’s campaign has also launched legal challenges complainin­g that their poll watchers were unable to scrutinize the voting process. Many of those challenges have been tossed out by judges, some within hours of their filing; again, none of the complaints show any evidence that the outcome of the election was affected.

The statement’s authors include the presidents of the National Associatio­n of State Election Directors and the National Associatio­n of Secretarie­s of State — who run elections at the state level — and the executive committee of the government-industry coordinati­ng council that includes all the major voting equipment vendors.

As Trump refuses to allow Biden to receive intelligen­ce briefings — even those he was getting during the campaign — an increasing number of Trump’s allies are calling for Biden to have access to the informatio­n.

“I just don’t know of any justificat­ion for withholdin­g the briefing,” Texas Sen. John Cornyn, a member of the Senate intelligen­ce committee, said Thursday.

“I see no problem with that,” said Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican Party’s longest-serving senator.

“I think so, yes,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, one of Trump’s closest confidants, when asked if Biden should be briefed.

T he Senate Republican­s advocated for Biden to receive the classified national security informatio­n even as they refused to acknowledg­e that the Democrat has won the presidenti­al election, citing Trump’s baseless claims of fraudulent votes.

“At this point at least, I think he should absolutely be getting intelligen­ce briefings,” Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley said of Biden. “The briefings he’s been getting as a candidate should continue. I think he should continue to get what he’s been getting and then let’s get on with the resolution­s on some of these disputes.”

The GOP pile- on supporting the intelligen­ce briefings amounted to minuscule cracks in support for Trump as he refuses to concede the race, but was also in line with Republican­s’ occasional, carefully worded answers about his actions during his presidency.

While only a handful of Republican­s have called Biden the president- elect, most were comfortabl­e Thursday challengin­g the Trump administra­tion on withholdin­g intelligen­ce informatio­n, which could constitute a national security risk when Biden assumes office.

 ??  ?? Grassley
Grassley
 ??  ?? Graham
Graham

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States