The Mercury News Weekend

Mississipp­i is offering lessons on education

- By Nicholas Kristof Nicholas Kristof is a New York Times columnist.

JACKSON, MISS. >> The refrain across much of the Deep South for decades was “Thank God for Mississipp­i!” That's because however abysmally Arkansas or Alabama might perform in national comparison­s, they could still bet that they wouldn't be the worst in America. That spot was often reserved for Mississipp­i.

So it's extraordin­ary to travel across this state today and find something dazzling: It is lifting education outcomes and soaring in the national rankings. With an all-out effort over the past decade to get all children to read by the end of third grade and by extensive reliance on research and metrics, Mississipp­i has shown that it is possible to raise standards even in a state ranked last in the country in child poverty and hunger and second highest in teen births.

In the National Assessment of Educationa­l Progress, a series of nationwide tests better known as NAEP, Mississipp­i has moved from near the bottom to the middle for most of the exams — and near the top when adjusted for demographi­cs. Among children who are in poverty, Mississipp­i fourth graders now are tied for best performers in the nation in NAEP reading tests and rank second in math.

The state also has lifted high school graduation rates. In 2011, 75% of students graduated, 4 percentage points below the national average; by 2020, the state had surpassed the national average of 87% by one point.

“Mississipp­i is a huge success story and very exciting,” David Deming, a Harvard economist and education expert, told me. “You cannot use poverty as an excuse. That's the most important lesson. It's so important, I want to shout it from the mountainto­p.”

What Mississipp­i teaches, he said, is that “we shouldn't be giving up on children.”

On my second day in Jackson, where 98% of public school students are people of color, mostly from low-income families, I visited a second-grade classroom.

The class was reading a book, “The Vegetables We Eat.” The children read aloud and debated what vegetables were. Things that are green? Foods that don't taste good? I was startled to see second graders read words like “vegetables” and “eggplant” fluently and still more astonished to see the entire class easily read the sentence “Where does nourishing food come from?”

Mississipp­i has achieved its gains despite ranking 46th in spending per pupil in grades K-12. Its low price tag is one reason Mississipp­i's strategy might be replicable in other states. Another is that while education reforms around the country have often been ferociousl­y contentiou­s and involved battles with teachers' unions, this education revolution in Mississipp­i unfolded with support from teachers and their union.

“This is something I'm proud of,” said Erica Jones, a second-grade teacher who is the president of the Mississipp­i affiliate of the National Education Associatio­n, the teachers' union. “We definitely have something to teach the rest of the country.”

Mississipp­i's success has no single origin moment, but one turning point was arguably when Jim Barksdale decided to retire in the state. A former CEO of Netscape, he had grown up in Mississipp­i but was humiliated by its history of racism and underperfo­rmance.

“My home state was always held in a low regard,” he told me. “I always felt embarrasse­d by that.”

Barksdale cast about for ways to improve education in the state and in 2000 he and his wife contribute­d $100 million to create a reading institute in Jackson that has proved very influentia­l. Beyond the money, he brought to the table a good relationsh­ip with officials such as the governor, as well as an executive's focus on measuremen­t and bang for the buck, and these have characteri­zed Mississipp­i's push ever since.

With the support of Barksdale and many others, a crucial milestone came in 2013 when state Republican­s pushed through a package of legislatio­n focused on education.

One pillar of Mississipp­i's new strategy was increasing reliance on phonics and a broader approach to literacy called the science of reading, which has been gaining ground around the country.

The 2013 legislativ­e package also invested in preK programs, targeting lowincome areas. Mississipp­i made the calculated decision to offer high-quality fullday programs with qualified teachers paid at the same rate as elementary school staff members, rather than offer a second-rate program to more children.

Perhaps the most important single element of the 2013 legislativ­e package was a test informally called the third-grade gate: Any child who does not pass a reading test at the end of third grade is held back and has to redo the year.

The third-grade gate lit a fire under Mississipp­i. It injected accountabi­lity: Principals, teachers, parents and children themselves were galvanized to ensure that kids actually learned to read. Each child's progress in reading is carefully monitored and those who lag — as early as kindergart­en and ramping up in second and third grades — are given additional tutoring.

As third grade progresses in Mississipp­i, there is an all-consuming focus on ensuring that every child can read well enough to make it through the thirdgrade gate.

What happens to the children forced to repeat third grade? A Boston University study this year found that those held back did not have any negative outcomes such as increased absences or placement in special education programs. On the contrary, they did much better several years later in sixth-grade English tests compared with those who just missed being held back. Gains from being held back were particular­ly large for Black and Hispanic students.

The Barksdale Reading Institute is developing a free online tool, Reading Universe, to make the state's approach to reading available to all schools in America and around the world. The idea is that kids everywhere should have the same opportunit­ies to learn and graduate as, say, students in high-poverty schools in the Delta.

Thank God for Mississipp­i.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States