The Mercury News

Labor-in-exchange-for-car arrangemen­t getting tricky

- LEONARD SCHWARZ JEANNE FLEMING Jeanne Fleming and Leonard Schwarz are Palo Alto-based columnists and authors. Please e-mail your questions about money and relationsh­ips to Questions@ MoneyManne­rs.net.

DEAR JEANNE AND LEONARD: A young man noticed that the car in my driveway had a “For Sale” sign on it, and he offered me 100 hours of labor in exchange for my vehicle. I said OK. “Zach” has been working down the hours, and everything’s going fine. Recently, though, he’s been bringing a helper with him, and now I’m unsure about where things stand between us. Do I count the helper’s hours toward the 100 hours Zach agreed to work, or should Zach work the 100 hours himself and pay his helper as he sees fit? And is this my decision or his? Judy K. Arkansas

DEAR JUDY: What does your contract with the young man say? … Just kidding. If people put all their agreements in writing, we’d be out of business.

But to answer your question: Zach must imagine that his helper’s hours count toward paying off his debt. Otherwise, why would he be bringing the guy? That said, if the helper is as good a worker as Zach, there’s no reason his hours shouldn’t count toward Zach’s debt. If, however, you think an hour of the helper’s time is worth less than an hour of Zach’s, you need to talk to Zach ASAP and clear things up.

And just so there’s no misunderst­anding: You’re the employer here, meaning it’s for you — not Zach — to decide whether his helper’s work is satisfacto­ry.

DEAR JEANNE AND LEONARD: My family has a small charitable foundation that makes what I would call significan­t contributi­ons to organizati­ons in our community. The foundation was establishe­d by our great-grandparen­ts to provide medical services to the indigent (great-granddad was a doctor). Here’s why I’m writing: Some of my cousins and I would like our foundation to also support several local conservati­on programs. But other cousins say we’re obligated to honor the wishes of our forebears. Isn’t it unreasonab­le for these cousins to insist that we stick so literally to the original mission of the foundation? Times have changed, and I feel that if they were alive today, our great-grandparen­ts would be fine with what we have in mind. H.A. New York

DEAR H.A.: So they’ve run out of sick poor people where you live?

Look, your greatgrand­parents endowed that foundation to address a need they particular­ly cared about, the need for the indigent to receive better medical care. Had they wanted their as-yet-unborn great-grandchild­ren to decide whether their money might be better spent on other causes, they would have put those sentiments in writing; you wouldn’t have to turn to your inner clairvoyan­t and “feel” them.

All of which is not to say that you’re wrong to be concerned about conservati­on efforts in your community. Far from it. There’s no reason why you and your like-thinking cousins shouldn’t follow the example of your generous great-grandparen­ts and support, with your own money, the local organizati­ons that address the problems you care so much about.

 ?? CARRIE HARTMAN/MINNEAPOLI­S STAR TRIBUNE ??
CARRIE HARTMAN/MINNEAPOLI­S STAR TRIBUNE
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States