The Mercury News

Assembly approves OT boost for laborers

Farmworker­s come to Capitol ‘to witness history,’ union chief says

- By Jazmine Ulloa and Sophia Bollag Los Angeles Times

In a historic win for farmworker­s, California lawmakers on Monday passed legislatio­n that would expand overtime pay for more than 825,000 laborers who bring produce to stores and tables across the state.

AB 1066, authored by Assemblywo­man Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, is headed to Gov. Jerry Brown after it was approved 44-32. The decision followed another intense showdown on the floor of the state Assembly, where a similar proposal died in June four votes short of the majority it needed to pass.

As the vote was tallied, applause broke out inside the Assembly chamber and in an overflow room, where more than 100 farmworker­s watched the debate on a livestream feed.

Outside the Assembly floor,

Gonzalez exchanged warm embraces with workers and labor union leaders. “These workers have been the face of this bill,” she said. “They’re the ones who pushed it, not just today but for decades in California.”

Arturo Rodriguez, president of the United Farm Workers of America, which sponsored the measure, lauded the workers who came to the Capitol, losing a day of work, to, as he put it, “be able to witness history.”

“These are the men and women who every day assure that we have fruit, vegetables and wine on our tables,” he said.

During what was an emotional debate, supporters of the bill framed the legislatio­n as a matter of human rights and dignity of work, saying farm laborers deserved the same protection­s as the vast majority of workers.

Assemblyma­n Jose Medina, D-Riverside, called the vote an opportunit­y to correct a wrong against a subset of workers that would do more to honor Cesar Chavez than any ceremony, walk or statue.

Assemblyma­n Tony Thurmond, D-Richmond, said it was about a simple equation: “A fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work.”

“This is not an attack on those who employ farmworker­s,” Thurmond said. “But this is in fact what farmworker­s have asked us to do. They have asked us to give them dignity, and we have the opportunit­y to make history today — history that has been 80 years in the making.”

Opponents said they were frustrated with rhetoric that implied farmers did not care about their workers, calling the bill purely symbolic. In a critique similar to those used by opponents of increasing the minimum wage, they argued it could backfire on farmworker­s, as it saddled farmers and growers with higher costs and could force them to limit work hours and hire more employees.

“We are asking our farmers to compete in a global market with a higher cost than any other industry,” said Assemblywo­man Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfiel­d.

Assemblyma­n James Gallagher, R-Nicolaus, argued the bill ignored the will of “people with their hands in the dirt.”

“This bill means they will get less hours, that they will have less money in their pockets,” he said.

The Western Growers Associatio­n called the Assembly decision a major disappoint­ment, calling it “short-sighted policy.”

“The members who voted for this bill have placed California farms at an even further competitiv­e disadvanta­ge internatio­nally and with other states,” Western Growers President and CEO Tom Nassif said in a statement.

The issue of farmworker overtime festered in recent weeks into one of the most contentiou­s at the end of a two-year session that has been marked by internal Democratic strife, with rifts growing between those members aligned with business interests and those allied with labor.

Gonzalez quietly revived her proposal against this backdrop, pushing past the normal procedures used to introduce legislatio­n by replacing the language of an unrelated bill.

United Farm Workers argued it corrected an injustice farmworker­s have lived with since they were first exempted from federal minimum wage and overtime standards nearly eight decades ago.

But prominent business groups, led by the California Farm Bureau Federation and a coalition of agricultur­al producers, countered its provisions further burdened farmworker­s already dealing with increased regulation­s and an ongoing water crisis.

Emotions flared Thursday when hundreds of farmworker­s arrived at the Capitol as the Assembly had been primed to take its final vote. For reasons that are in dispute, the lower house abruptly adjourned without ever taking up the issue, and although Gonzalez contended she had the 41 votes she needed to get the bill passed, the lack of action suggested she did not have the support.

California Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Paramount, who rose to the floor in support of the bill and last week promised to do everything in his power to get it passed, said he spent the weekend having conversati­ons and going over wage data with lawmakers who held concerns.

Of the final vote, he said he felt “a tremendous sense of history, a tremendous sense of us doing something right.”

Rendon said Gov. Jerry Brown has not given him an answer when asked if he will support the legislatio­n, but Rendon said he felt the governor would be thoughtful.

 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Arturo Rodriguez, president of the United Farm Workers, hugs Assemblywo­man Lorena Gonzalez.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I/ASSOCIATED PRESS Arturo Rodriguez, president of the United Farm Workers, hugs Assemblywo­man Lorena Gonzalez.
 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Maria Ceja, right, joins other farmworker­s in celebratin­g outside the Assembly chambers after overtime victory.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I/ASSOCIATED PRESS Maria Ceja, right, joins other farmworker­s in celebratin­g outside the Assembly chambers after overtime victory.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States