The Mercury News

After GOP defeat, some Dems float ‘Medicare for all’

Growing numbers in party pushing for more progressiv­e single-payer system

- By Alex Roarty McClatchy Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — The Republican Party’s failure to pass a health care bill has left most Democrats overjoyed, confident now that former President Barack Obama’s landmark Affordable Care Act will remain law for the foreseeabl­e future. But not everybody in the party is satisfied.

A small but growing group of liberals — some of them leaders in the Democratic Party — are already pushing their colleagues to embrace a more progressiv­e vision for health care.

At the top of this band of activists’ wish list is a radical change, converting the country into a so-called single-payer system that would act much as Medicare does for people 65 and

“We have got to have the guts to take on the insurance companies, the drug companies, and move forward toward a Medicare for all, single-payer program.” — Bernie Sanders, D-Vt.

older. But they’re also pursuing a series of smaller objectives, including letting people who sign up for the ACA’s state-based exchanges enroll in a government-backed plan, known as the public option.

It’s a debate that’s likely to shape the Democratic Party for years to come, as its leaders grapple with the issue’s deep political risks — a lesson many of them learned well after “Obamacare” passed in 2010 and immediatel­y became a focal point of GOP attacks.

As former presidenti­al candidate and liberal icon Bernie Sanders put it, the ACA is “far, far, far from perfect.”

“We have got to have the guts to take on the insurance companies, the drug companies, and move forward toward a Medicare for all, single-payer program,” the senator from Vermont said on MSNBC after the GOP’s health care bill died in the House. “And I’ll be introducin­g legislatio­n shortly to do that.”

A Sanders spokesman confirmed the senator will introduce single-payer legislatio­n in the coming weeks, similar to measures he’s previously pushed.

In addition, 62 percent of Americans turned thumbs down on President Donald Trump’s handling of health care during the initial weeks of his presidency, according to a poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research released Wednesday. It was his worst rating among seven issues the poll tested, including the economy, foreign policy and immigratio­n.

Of six changes the failed House GOP bill would have made to former President Barack Obama’s law, five drew more negative than positive reviews.

An overwhelmi­ng 8 in 10 opposed the Republican proposal to let insurers boost premiums on older people. Seven in 10 disapprove­d of premium surcharges for people whose coverage lapses.

By wide margins, people also disliked proposed cuts in Medicaid, which helps lower-earning people cover medical costs; a halt in federal payments to Planned Parenthood; and a transforma­tion of the Obama law’s subsidies — based on income and premium costs — into aid linked to age.

Even before the implementa­tion of Obamacare, most Democrats dismissed serious talk of creating a single-payer system. Many in the party feared the politics of an enormous expansion of government and the disruption it would bring to the health care market.

Progressiv­e activists now wonder if the political calculus has shifted in their favor. To them, the failure of the GOP plan supported by Trump — the American Health Care Act — was proof that the public will reject any plan that reduces coverage.

That leaves only one option for health care reform, these Democrats argue: legislatio­n that increases government involvemen­t and coverage for the poor and uninsured.

“We’ve check-mated Republican­s,” said Kaitlin Sweeney, spokeswoma­n for the Progressiv­e Change Campaign Committee. “The only choice is to go for a forward-looking solution that lowers costs, improves care and covers everyone. And that’s Medicare for all.”

Absent a plan for change, she added, Democrats will be forced to defend an unpopular existing system that will anger moderates and underwhelm the party’s base.

“Sticking with a defensive posture and just protecting the status quo is not going to be something that fires up voters in 2018 or 2020,” Sweeney said. “It’s not something you can hold to as an effective strategy to go after Republican­s.”

Taking a progressiv­e stand on health care is something liberal activists plan to make a campaign issue in next year’s congressio­nal elections. The PCCC on Tuesday sent its members a petition demanding that all 2018 Democratic candidates pledge to “publicly support and run on Medicare for all.”

On the surface, at least, polls suggest that the public is open to such an enormous overhaul. A 2016 survey from Gallup found that 58 percent of Americans supported replacing the ACA with a federally funded system that provided insurance to everybody.

That same year, a poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 64 percent of adults had a positive reaction to the expression “Medicare for all.”

Of course, the same poll found that only 44 percent of people had a positive reaction to “single-payer” and just 38 percent to the term “socialized medicine.”

And therein lies the rub for some Democratic strategist­s, who say a bold change to the health care system can, politicall­y speaking, look good on paper but be much more difficult in reality.

“It might be popular to say Medicare for all,” said Rodell Mollineau, a Democratic strategist. “It becomes much more difficult when you talk about implementi­ng such a large government program.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States