The Mercury News

New rules could roil emerging pot market

- By Lisa M. Krieger lkrieger@bayareanew­sgroup.com

California consumers will soon have two choices in cannabis: clean, legal and pricey — or dirty, illicit and cheap.

Think Whole Foods vs. El Chapo.

The big difference will be the amount of pesticides in your weed. That’s because starting Jan. 2, when California’s vast legal marijuana market opens, all cannabis must be tested — and most chemicals will be banned.

Much of California’s cannabis is tainted, including the “medicinal” stuff. But soon state-sanctioned weed may become the greenest in the nation.

But here’s the catch: Most growers — particular­ly the getrich-quick newbies and indus-

trial-scale Big Weed wannabes — aren’t ready to grow marijuana without pesticides. And then there are all those illegal grows in California’s vast and remote public forests, often set up by Mexican drug cartels.

Where will all their weed go if it can’t pass muster with state labs? Much of it will end up in the hands of that sketchy guy on the street corner, selling it for far less than your local dispensary, growers say.

“It’s much harder to produce clean cannabis. It takes discipline, time and paying attention,” said Brian McCall, owner and operator of Blue Belly Farms, which grows pesticide-free cannabis in the Santa Cruz Mountains.

“There are so many ways to fail,” he said. “You can’t sell it if it’s not in compliance with the new state law. The stuff that fails is going to go to the black market — or across state lines.”

While most cannabis cultivator­s hope to get state licenses, many may end up dumping failed products on the illegal market, while others may opt to stay out of the legal system altogether to avoid the new regulation­s, growers say.

One reason is that blackmarke­t cannabis is so much cheaper to grow. And if it’s sold in states that haven’t legalized marijuana, it will command a higher price than weed sold in California.

Only an estimated 10 to 15 percent of the state’s growers will meet the new standards, predicts Hezekiah Allen, executive director of the California Growers Associatio­n, which advocates for marijuana cultivator­s. Those who succeed are likely to have rigorous and well-establishe­d practices who have long toiled to make a modest, independen­t and organic living, he said.

A no-brainer?

Clean cannabis seems like a no-brainer to the millions of California­ns devoted to organic fruit and vegetables, natural deodorant, cruelty-free moisturize­r, sustainabl­e dental floss and grass-fed-cow cream in their frappuccin­o lattes.

Indeed, it’s been a point of pride for California’s small marijuana farmers. Every day they attend to each plant, lovingly inspecting it for any sign of stress, illness or infestatio­n.

“The granola-eating hippie also smokes pesticidef­ree cannabis,” said Allen, born and raised off-the-grid in rural Humboldt County. “There’s a cultural propensity.”

So, from the beginning, clean weed was a big part of the motivation of legalizati­on supporters. Back in 2015, two of marijuana’s strongest legislativ­e champions, Assemblyma­n Jim Wood, D-Healdsburg, and state Sen. Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, called on California to develop testing, standards and pesticide limits in legislatio­n that increased regulation of the medical marijuana industry.

And by passing Propositio­n 64 last November to legalize recreation­al weed, voters directed the state to “establish a certified organic designatio­n and organic certificat­ion program for marijuana and marijuana products.”

But state regulators are only now catching up, hastily drafting regulation­s. A draft plan released in April set some of the most rigorous standards in the nation.

Meanwhile, there’s a profit-driven “green rush” to capitalize on California’s huge legal market, with growers — from fresh-faced newcomers to violent Mexican cartels — using pesticide practices that would make Monsanto proud.

Sampling reveals alarming amounts of chemicals in the medical marijuana sold at California’s dispensari­es. Last year, Steep Hill Labs, a Berkeley-based testing facility, detected pesticides in 84 percent of samples. At San Francisco’s HempCon competitio­n in August, a stunning 80 percent of the flowers, edibles and concentrat­es were tainted by pesticides, mold or harmful solvents, according to Anresco Laboratori­es in San Francisco.

These toxins are smoked, vaped and eaten — unlike, say, the stuff that’s sprayed on your orange peel or banana skin. And because cannabis is a federally banned drug, there’s little research about the health effects of pesticide-laden pot — or whether these chemicals change when ignited. No one really knows what’s safe.

But organic weed is easier said than done.

For starters, the federal government offers no guidance. The U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency, the authority for such things, lists no “registered” pesticide products for illegal substances, so the state can’t list them either. And while a different administra­tion may have approved special “local use” petitions, President Donald Trump’s EPA says it won’t, said environmen­tal attorney Joshua Bloom, of the Oakland law firm Meyers Nave.

The state is still drafting the final rules, but its list will likely allow products that are so benign that they’re exempt from federal registrati­on requiremen­ts such as cinnamon, rosemary, peppermint oils, sulfur and iron phosphate.

Propositio­n 64’s pesticide-free requiremen­t is nerve-racking for growers because cannabis is so valuable. It costs more per gram than gold. Plants can be quickly wiped out by plagues from mildew to mites. And, no, you can’t buy crop insurance.

Soils may hold old chemical residue from previous crops, they add. Or sprayed pesticides may blow in from neighborin­g fields.

“People get scared when their bottom line is threatened,” said Russell Pace of the Humboldt Countybase­d Cannabis Horticultu­ral Associatio­n.

Risks of all-natural

Natural remedies take patience and skill. They’re labor-intensive. They take more frequent applicatio­ns — and can be less effective.

“The first step is prevention. You start with seeds, not clones. You don’t overwater,” said Chrystal Ortiz, operations manager for True Humboldt, a collective of small Humboldt County farmers who expect to excel under the new rules. “The second step is manual control. You use enzymes, essential oils and beneficial fungus. You remove caterpilla­rs and banana slugs by hand.”

Tiny sachets — holding pest-fighting mites — decorate their pot farms.

“Cleanlines­s is next to godliness,” Pace said.

But proving this cleanlines­s will be expensive for farmers, eating into profits. State-approved testing will cost about $400 per pound — about half to onethird the $800 to $1,200 per pound price that good commercial grade cannabis brings on the market, Allen said.

Colorado’s challenge

In Colorado, tremors ran through the cannabis market when the state imposed pesticide regulation­s after the legalizati­on vote, said James R. Ott of Precision Cultivatio­n Company, a consulting company in Longmont, Colorado.

“It was quite challengin­g. There was a huge learning curve right off the bat,” said Ott, previously with Syngenta, a Swiss agricultur­e and biotech company “Most people hadn’t thought about the cultural or cultivatio­n practices needed to minimize pests.

“The guy who’s been growing 60 plants in his basement all of a sudden has 10,000 plants in a facility — and he has not seen these things happen at scale,” Ott added. “The easy thing was … just spray.”

Yields fell. Crops were destroyed or diverted to the illegal market. Businesses failed.

“What we experience­d in Colorado is coming to the folks in California,” predicted Jay Czarkowski of the Boulder-based consulting firm Canna Advisors. “There will be a massive shift. It takes years to clean up.

“Companies had to issue recalls,” he said. “It was a tough transition for those who did not have horticultu­ral background. They couldn’t rely on those crutches anymore.”

The entreprene­urs who are brand new to cannabis, or who cut corners in the rush to expand, won’t make the cut, experts agreed. And the fly-by-night and criminal cartel growers will continue to supply the black market, just as they always have.

“It’s a very different approach than the industrial agricultur­al model … which views cannabis as a commodity,” Allen said. “There will be some rude awakenings.”

Come Jan. 1, California will still be awash in cheap, untested and pesticide-treated weed, experts said. But consumers will finally have a choice.

After decades of unregulate­d weed, will they be willing to pay more for a state-approved product?

If so, the landscape will change, with incentives for growers to do things the right way, said attorney Bloom.

“It all comes back to the consumer,” said environmen­tal attorney Robert L. “Buzz” Hines of San Francisco’s Farella Braun + Martel.

“As consumers get a lot more sophistica­ted,” he predicted, “I believe you’ll see them choose something they know and trust.”

 ?? CHRIS DILLMANN — VAIL DAILY ?? Marijuana growers say it will be harder to follow the new rules. “It takes discipline, time and paying attention.”
CHRIS DILLMANN — VAIL DAILY Marijuana growers say it will be harder to follow the new rules. “It takes discipline, time and paying attention.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States