The Mercury News

Scott tells Republican­s: Do better on judicial nominees

- By Sean Sullivan The Washington Post

Sen. Tim Scott, the only African-American Republican in the Senate, has a blunt message for his party’s leaders: When it comes to picking judicial nominees and examining their records on race, you can do better.

The senator from South Carolina made his point in a letter to the editor published online Thursday and in print on Friday by the Wall Street Journal. Scott’s note came a week after he announced his opposition to Thomas Farr, dooming the U.S. district court nominee’s chances of being confirmed.

Most Republican senators have fallen in line behind the president on judicial nomination­s and other matters. The two most vocal Republican critics of Trump in the Senate, Sens. Bob Corker of Tennessee and Jeff Flake of Arizona, are headed to retirement in a few weeks.

But Scott has signaled that he is willing to do what most elected Republican­s have not during Trump’s presidency — challenge the GOP to change its positions on race, politics and their intersecti­on.

Scott writes in his letter that he was “saddened that in the editorial ‘Democrats and Racial Division’ (Dec. 1) you attempt to deflect the concerns regarding Thomas Farr’s nomination to the federal bench.”

He continues, “While you are right that his nomination should be seen through a wider lens, the solution isn’t simply to decry ‘racial attacks.’ Instead, we should stop bringing candidates with questionab­le track records on race before the full Senate for a vote.”

Scott offered a similar argument last week as he addressed questions from reporters. At the time, he had not announced whether he would support Farr but had just cast a vote to advance his nomination.

“We are not doing a very good job of avoiding the obvious potholes on race in America, and we ought to be more sensitive when it comes to those issues,” Scott said, speaking of the Republican Party.

Asked how the party should go about doing that, Scott replied that “a lot of folks” around the country could be judges, aside from Farr.

The next day, Scott announced his opposition to Farr. He cited a Justice Department memo published in The Washington Post that looked at the 1984 and 1990 campaigns of Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C. The Helms campaign, for which Farr worked, had come under scrutiny for distributi­ng postcards that the Justice Department later said were sent to intimidate black voters from going to the polls.

“This week, a Department of Justice memo written under President George H.W. Bush was released that shed new light on Mr. Farr’s activities. This, in turn, created more concerns. Weighing these important factors, this afternoon I concluded that I could not support Mr. Farr’s nomination,” he explained in his statement.

The Wall Street Journal editorial Scott responded to this week argues that “Democrats are taking racial politics to new heights.” The editorial highlighte­d Scott’s position on Farr.

Scott, along with Rep. Will Hurd, R-Texas, will be one of just two AfricanAme­rican Republican­s in the next Congress.

 ?? ANDREW HARRER — BLOOMBERG ?? Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., believes Republican senators should “stop bringing candidates with questionab­le track records on race before the full Senate for a vote.”
ANDREW HARRER — BLOOMBERG Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., believes Republican senators should “stop bringing candidates with questionab­le track records on race before the full Senate for a vote.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States