The Mercury News

Despite millions more in funds, quality of prison rehab programs questionab­le

- By Claudia Boyd-Barrett California Health Report

Although California is spending millions of dollars on rehabilita­tion programs for prison inmates, there’s little evidence to show those programs are effective, according to a state audit.

In a report released recently, the state auditor’s office found that, while the budget for in-prison rehabilita­tion programs at the California Department of Correction­s and Rehabilita­tion (CDCR) increased by $64 million between 2013 and 2019, recidivism rates have remained stubbornly high, with an average of 50 percent of inmates reoffendin­g within three years.

An auditor’s analysis of one type of rehabilita­tion program, called cognitive behavioral therapy, found no significan­t difference in recidivism rates between inmates who completed such programs and those who didn’t.

The analysis also found that the CDCR didn’t ensure that cognitive behavioral therapy programs offered a consistent quality of care in all state prisons.

Part of the problem, State Auditor Elaine Howle wrote in a letter to legislator­s, is that CDCR hasn’t evaluated whether it’s placing inmates in appropriat­e programs, and many inmates are not having their rehabilita­tion needs met. Sixtytwo percent of the inmates released between July 2017 and June 2018 had none of their rehabilita­tive needs met.

“These results are serious enough to highlight an urgent need for Correction­s to take a more active and meaningful role in ensuring that these programs are effective,” Howle wrote. “Because the Legislatur­e provided Correction­s with a significan­t budget increase so that it could expand rehabilita­tion programs to all prisons in the State, it is vital that Correction­s demonstrat­e that the additional investment was worthwhile.”

CDCR spokesman Terri Hardy responded with a written statement that the department is taking the auditor’s findings seriously, and is already working to expand prison rehabilita­tion programs and improve their effectiven­ess.

“The data used in this analysis (2014-15) predates a significan­t expansion in rehabilita­tive programmin­g as well as the implementa­tion of new quality control tools to assess the effectiven­ess of these programs,” the statement said. “The Department is committed to building a strong model to measure our rehabilita­tive programs consistent­ly and to continue enhancing public safety by ensuring our inmates have the skills and resources they need for a successful transition back to their communitie­s.”

Assemblyma­n Reggie Jones-Sawyer, D-Los Angeles, who chairs the Assembly Public Safety Committee, said he requested the audit to get a snapshot of how the state’s prison reform efforts are working so far so that problems can be handled before even more money is invested.

“California­ns have voted and authorized the state to put forward hundreds of millions of dollars toward rehabilita­tion and there’s no room to get it wrong, we have to get it right,” he said. “I want to know where are we so that we can improve, so we can have the best rehabilita­tion program, not just in the country but … in the world.”

Jones-Sawyer said he will be meeting with CDCR’s management to discuss the audit and how they plan to improve rehabilita­tion programs. He said he also wants to ensure that the next leader of the department is fully committed to ensuring rehabilita­tion efforts are successful.

“This is a long process, and we’re at the beginning of it,” he said. “If we start making correction­s now, five years from now, 10 years from now, we’re going to look back at that audit and be really proud of how we’ve moved forward and improved the system.”

Lenore Anderson, who heads the prison reform advocacy group California­ns for Safety and Justice, said the auditor’s findings point to a need to invest more money and effort in rehabilita­tion programs, not less.

“We are talking about a prison system that has not prioritize­d rehabilita­tion for many decades, and so turning that ship around will require a lot of work and a lot of change in culture and a lot of change in financial priorities and a lot of change in staffing,” she said. “We’re really trying to go from a punishment only approach to correction­s to a rehabilita­tion approach to correction­s, and that is both what voters want, it’s what many leaders want, and it’s also something that is going to take a lot more steps to achieve.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States