Johnson is referred to watchdog over scandal
LONDON >> A monitor at London’s City Hall has referred Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain to a police watchdog for a possible investigation of claims that he unduly favored an U.S. entrepreneur while mayor of the city, intensifying a politically risky scandal as he faces a hostile Parliament and a looming Brexit deadline.
The official said the claims about Johnson’s ties to the entrepreneur, Jennifer Arcuri, who joined several of the mayor’s international trade missions and whose businesses were awarded tens of thousands of pounds in government money, were a “conduct matter” — essentially “an indication” that he may have committed “a criminal offense.”
The government’s response was fierce and dismissive: A Cabinet minister from Johnson’s Conservative Party, Theresa Villiers, told the BBC on Saturday that it was “an obviously politicized complaint.”
Several British news outlets earlier quoted an unnamed government source as calling the referral “a nakedly political put-up job,” one done without warning to Johnson and without following due process.
Both Johnson and Arcuri have denied any wrongdoing.
The referral does not necessarily mean the prime minister will be investigated. The Independent Office for Police Conduct confirmed that it had “received a referral from the monitoring officer of the
Greater London Authority regarding a conduct matter against Boris Johnson.”
But it added in a statement, “This will take time to thoroughly assess and consider before any decision is taken as to whether it is necessary to investigate this matter.”
The referral letter was attributed to the Greater London Authority’s monitoring officer, Emma Strain, a career official who worked at City Hall in other roles during Johnson’s tenure as mayor.
A City Hall spokesman did not immediately respond to requests for comment Saturday.
The letter said she was legally obligated to refer Johnson to the police watchdog because she had been made aware of accusations that, if true, could amount to an offense of
misconduct in public office.
“During this time it has been brought to my attention that you maintained a friendship with Ms. Jennifer Arcuri, and as a result of that friendship allowed Ms. Arcuri to participate in trade missions and receive sponsorship monies in circumstances where she and her companies could not have expected otherwise to receive those benefits,” the letter said.
But the letter added that it was not the monitoring officer’s role “to investigate or determine whether any offense has been committed. Similarly, I do not investigate the veracity of the allegations or whether they are substantiated.”
The letter did not mention who had passed on the accusations to the monitoring officer.