The Mercury News

Trump fixation with Obama nearly set Middle East on fire

- By Eugene Robinson Eugene Robinson writes for the Washington Post.

WASHINGTON >> President Trump’s Ahab-like obsession with erasing the legacy of Barack Obama almost set the Middle East on fire this week. It may still.

There is no better explanatio­n for Trump’s rash decision to assassinat­e Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, especially in light of the president’s weird, self-congratula­tory, self-contradict­ory speech Wednesday purporting to declare an end to the crisis he created. The whole thing seems as much about Trump’s Obama fixation.

The tell was Trump’s false claim that “the missiles fired last night at us and our allies were paid for with the funds made available by the last administra­tion.”

Does Obama take up that much space inside Trump’s head?

After some predictabl­e boasting and chest-thumping, Trump laid out what he wants: An end to Iran’s progress toward a nuclear weapon, in exchange for relief from crippling economic sanctions. But that happens to be precisely what Obama had already achieved, with the comprehens­ive and highly effective nuclear deal that Trump pulled the United States out of.

The true Iran hawks — such as former national security adviser John Bolton, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Marco Rubio, R-fla. — want much more. Bolton has already made clear that he believes the U.S. goal should be regime change. The hawks want, at a minimum, an end to Iran’s use of proxy forces throughout the Middle East and its ambitions to be a regional great power.

But Trump doesn’t have the patience or the stomach to seek, much less achieve, all of that. After the Iranian ballistic missiles fell harmlessly, Trump quickly decided not to retaliate against Iran’s retaliatio­n. As soon as he saw a door marked “EXIT,” he took it.

It’s not possible to take Trump’s aversion to war for granted, however, because seemingly everything is subsidiary to the erase-obama imperative. It’s not about policy. It must be about something else.

You’ll recall that the vehicle Trump used to transform himself from a harmless New York character into a malevolent political force was birtherism — the absurd, fictional and racist claim that the nation’s first African American president was not actually born in the United States. I have met Trump supporters who still believe in this thoroughly debunked fairy tale.

Obama’s election made a powerful statement about the nation and its growing diversity. Trump, however, portrayed that statement as a threat. Whether he genuinely felt a sense of racial panic, or just pretended to do so, is irrelevant. That’s how he played it.

It is tragic that Trump has tried so hard to demolish the Affordable Care Act, apparently because it is popularly known as Obamacare. It is heartbreak­ing that he has tried so hard to roll back the Obama administra­tion’s environmen­tal regulation­s, though that may have more to do with Trump’s denial of climate change. And I almost laughed Wednesday when Trump, after so often scoffing at Obama’s faith in multilater­alism, called on NATO to “become much more involved in the Middle East process.”

The Obama thing would be amusing if he didn’t have the power to make life-or-death decisions.

Repercussi­ons from the Soleimani killing are not over. Hawks who are crowing about how “deterrence works” ignore the fact that the Iranian regime can be both patient and strategic. Trump has been talked into sending 18,000 more troops to the Middle East since last spring — creating a target-rich environmen­t for Iran’s proxy forces, should the decision be made to stage some kind of attack.

In his mania to be the antiobama, Trump appears to have set a hair trigger: Any U.S. casualties caused directly or indirectly by Iran will prompt a military response. The government in Tehran might decide to call his bluff, and that could lead to all-out war.

Iran is closer to being able to make a nuclear weapon now than when Trump took office. The mullahs might even decide that the only w)ay to ensure their safety is to race to build a bomb — which could also lead to all-out war.

I don’t like being alarmist. But I’m alarmed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States