The Mercury News

Trump ups mileage proposal, but it’s well below Obama plan for environmen­tal limits

- By Tom Krisher and Ellen Knickmeyer

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion is making a concession on its proposed minimum fuel economy requiremen­t for new vehicles, but environmen­tal groups and a key Democratic senator complain it does not go far enough, and still falls well below the requiremen­ts set under the Obama administra­tion.

Fuel economy standards would increase 1.5% per year from 2021 through 2026 under the new proposal. That’s a reversal from the Trump administra­tion’s proposal in 2018, which sought to freeze the standards at 2020 levels.

Environmen­talists and Delaware Sen. Tom Carper hardly cheered the move, which doesn’t come close to the 5% annual increase that the Obama administra­tion had mandated.

Carper, senior Democrat on the Environmen­t and Public Works Committee, released some details of the latest fuelstanda­rds proposal in a letter

Wednesday urging the administra­tion to scrap its new mileage proposal as ineffectiv­e and costly.

“My office’s review of the draft final rule indicates that it utterly fails to provide any demonstrab­le safety, environmen­tal or economic benefit to consumers or the country,” Carper wrote in a letter to the Office of Management and Budget.

The office reviews proposed regulation­s before they are finalized and printed in the Federal Register. The administra­tion hasn’t released the numbers, but they are detailed in Carper’s letter to Paul Ray, a management and budget administra­tor.

The Trump administra­tion has billed its mileage standards as safer and less costly to motorists, but there’s a growing chorus of critics disputing that, including the Trump EPA’s own scientific advisory board. The mileage rollback has become one of the most fiercely contested rollback efforts by the administra­tion, prompting legal battles with California and other

states and splitting loyalties of top automakers.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion, which develops fuel economy rules, wouldn’t comment Thursday. It reissued a statement saying the rule will improve fuel economy, cut pollution and make vehicles more affordable.

When the Trump administra­tion released its proposed “Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule” in 2018, it calculated that the rule would save 12,700 lives in car crashes

through model year 2029. The logic was that relaxed fuel mileage standards would cut the cost of vehicles, making them more affordable and increasing sales. Since new vehicles are safer, lives would be saved.

The proposal pegged the cost of meeting Obamaera requiremen­ts at $2,700 per vehicle and said buyers would save that much per car by 2025.

But Carper wrote that the administra­tion’s final proposal claims total savings of 474 lives through 2029. That number doesn’t include deaths associated with increased air pollution from less-efficient vehicles, Carper wrote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States