The Mercury News

Stores preparing to allow shoppers’ reusable bags.

Law was suspended out of fears of virus spread, but experts say reusables pose little health risk

- By Martin Wisckol

Get ready to pack your reusable bags, or pay 10 cents for store bags when you go shopping, if you aren’t already. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s April 22 suspension of the state’s single-use bag ban expired June 22, and stores are eliminatin­g their interim free-bag policies.

Suspension of the state law came after some retailers unilateral­ly stopped allowing reusable bags out of concern that they could contribute to the spread of the coronaviru­s.

Now, environmen­talists are celebratin­g the return of the single-use ban. They — along with many health experts — say reusable bags pose little health risk, particular­ly if they’re washed regularly and handled only by the shopper.

Additional­ly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has updated its guidance, noting that there’s been no documentat­ion of anyone catching the coronaviru­s from an inanimate surface.

“Transmissi­on of coronaviru­s occurs much more commonly through respirator­y droplets than through objects and surfaces,” according to the CDC website.

The Ralphs-Kroger-Food 4 Less and Vons-Safeway chains are preparing to allow reusable bags in stores where they had been temporaril­y banned and will start charging 10 cents for store bags.

The California Grocers Associatio­n said it has notified its members of the rule change and indicated no opposition to resuming use of reusable bags.

“We defer this decision to local health authoritie­s, who know best how to proceed,” said associatio­n spokesman Dave Heylen. “Cal-OSHA has provided guidelines for store employees to follow in the event a customer brings their own bag.”

The most recent CalOSHA guidelines, dated May 26, say that customers should leave their reusable bags in their carts until checkout, that employees should not touch the bags and that customers should bag their own purchases.

The United Food and Commercial Workers union, which represents grocery workers and declined to comment for this report, does not appear to have taken a position on reusable bags.

Environmen­tal groups have been pushing steadfastl­y against efforts to reintroduc­e single-use bags and other single-use plastics, arguing that they are no safer than their reusable counterpar­ts. Some say reusables are even safer because the owner knows exactly where they’ve been.

The groups say efforts toward the eliminatio­n of disposable plastics needs to continue in order to reduce litter, a threat to marine life; nonbiodegr­adable landfill waste; and greenhouse gases produced by the manufactur­e of plastics.

“We understand that, out of abundance of caution, in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, some retailers and even some county public health officers chose to temporaril­y discourage consumers from bringing their own reusable bags into stores,” said Mark Murray, executive director of California­ns Against Waste. “(But) there was never any evidence that COVID could be or has been transmitte­d via reusable bags.”

A document signed by more than 110 health experts from 18 countries makes the case that reusable products — including bags, containers and food service utensils — are no less safe than their disposable counterpar­ts. The document has been released by the environmen­tal groups Greenpeace USA and UPSTREAM.

California­ns Against Waste and Environmen­t California were among groups that wrote the governor asking to resume the bag ban. The California Grocers Associatio­n, which supported the ban when it was ratified by voters in 2016 and called for the temporary suspension of the ban in a March 25 letter to Newsom, did not write a position letter to the governor before the suspension expired.

“It’s projected that as many as 1 billion singleuse bags were distribute­d in California in April and May alone, costing consumers more than $20 million in higher grocery costs,” Murray said.

When some stores began prohibitin­g reusable bags and instead provided free sacks in late March, there was no legal basis for sidesteppi­ng the state’s singleuse bag ban. Yet, up until Newsom suspended the bag ban statewide April 22, there appears to have been no enforcemen­t taken against the scofflaws.

And there’s no indication that the law will be enforced now. The ban became effective again June 22, but Heylen of the California Grocers Associatio­n said he’s heard of no enforcemen­t efforts.

Inquiries to CalRecycle about future enforcemen­t of the law were referred to Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Becerra’s office referred questions to Newsom’s office. Newsom’s office did not respond to the question.

Local authoritie­s can enforce the law, but it looks unlikely that any sack patrols will be monitoring stores in the near future.

“There was never any evidence that COVID could be or has been transmitte­d via reusable bags.”

— Mark Murray, executive director of California­ns Against Waste

 ??  ??
 ?? STAFF ARCHIVES ?? The suspension of California’s single-use bag ban expired June 22, and stores are eliminatin­g their free-bag policies. But guidelines say shoppers who bring reusable bags to stores should be ready to bag their own purchases.
STAFF ARCHIVES The suspension of California’s single-use bag ban expired June 22, and stores are eliminatin­g their free-bag policies. But guidelines say shoppers who bring reusable bags to stores should be ready to bag their own purchases.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States