The Mercury News

Twitter ‘embarrasse­d’ by breach of 130 accounts

- By Barbara Ortutay

OAKLAND >> Twitter says the hack that compromise­d the accounts of some of its most high-profile users targeted 130 people. The hackers were able to reset the passwords of 45 of those accounts.

The San Francisco-based company said in a blog post Saturday that for up to eight of these accounts, the attackers also downloaded the account’s informatio­n through the “Your Twitter Data” tool. None of the eight were verified accounts, Twitter said, adding that it is contacting the owners of the affected accounts.

“We’re embarrasse­d, we’re disappoint­ed, and more than anything, we’re sorry. We know that we must work to regain your trust, and we will support all efforts to bring the perpetrato­rs to justice,” Twitter said in the blog post.

Friday’s attack broke into the Twitter accounts of world leaders, celebritie­s and tech moguls in one of the most high-profile security breaches in recent years.

The attackers sent out tweets from the accounts of the public figures, offering to send $2,000 for every $1,000 sent to an anonymous Bitcoin address.

It highlighte­d a major flaw with the service millions of people have come to rely on as an essential communicat­ions tool.

Allison Nixon, chief research officer at cybersecur­ity firm 221B said in an email Sunday that the people behind the attack appear to have come from the “OG” community, a group interested in original, short Twitter handles such as @a, @b or @c, for instance.

“Based upon what we have seen,the motivation for the most recent Twitter attack is similar to previous incidents we have observed in the OG community — a combinatio­n of financial incentive, technical bragging rights, challenge, and disruption,” Nixon wrote.

“The OG community is not known to be tied to any nation state. Rather they are a disorganiz­ed crime community with a basic skillset and are a loosely organized group of serial fraudsters.”

While this attack did not appear to go further than the Bitcoin ruse — at least for now — it raises questions about Twitter’s ability to secure its service against election interferen­ce and misinforma­tion ahead of the U.S. presidenti­al election.

“Entire markets and potentiall­y elections may be manipulate­d or altered in this way,” Nixon said. “Victims of account takeovers generally do not know that the fraud has occurred, and generally cannot take security precaution­s to prevent it.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States