The Mercury News

Congress passes major public lands bill.

-

WASHINGTON >> The nation’s conservati­on community achieved a longstandi­ng goal Wednesday when the House passed and sent to President Donald Trump a measure that for the first time guarantees maximum annual funding for the premiere federal program to acquire and preserve land for public use.

Fueled by election-year politics, the legislatio­n was easily approved on a bipartisan 310-107 vote. It would allocate $900 million each year to the Land and Water Conservati­on Fund while also providing up to $9.5 billion over five years to begin clearing up a mounting maintenanc­e backlog at national parks.

Conservati­on leaders hailed the measure as a landmark achievemen­t. They said it would protect and expand access to public lands at a time when Americans are gaining in appreciati­on for outdoor activities because of the pandemic, while providing tens of thousands of jobs in tourism-dependent communitie­s that have seen their economies suffer because of reduced travel.

“Passing the Great American Outdoors Act is quite simply the most significan­t investment in conservati­on in decades,” said Collin O’Mara, president of the National Wildlife Federation. “It’s a huge win for wildlife, our national treasures, our economy and all Americans who enjoy our public lands for solace, recreation and exercise, especially amid this pandemic.”

Establishe­d in 1964, the fund is supposed to distribute revenues from oil and gas drilling royalties paid to the government for public land improvemen­t as well as acquisitio­n from willing sellers. But Congress has regularly siphoned money away from it. The fund was made permanent last year, but the legislatio­n approved Wednesday was viewed as a critical final step to assure its full allotment of dollars.

“This commitment to conservati­on will pay economic, health and society dividends for generation­s to come,” said Jennifer Morris, chief executive of the Nature Conservanc­y.

Some House Republican­s from the West fought the measure, portraying the legislatio­n as a badly flawed federal land grab that could end up costing taxpayers money if energy production slowed by the pandemic does not produce the $900 million in annual funding that will be mandatory under the legislatio­n.

But two Senate Republican­s from the West facing tough re-election fights — Cory Gardner of Colorado and Steve Daines of Montana — seized on the measure as beneficial both for their states and for their election prospects, and provided strong momentum for the legislatio­n.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States