The Mercury News

League’s juggling act with schedule just getting started

- By Barry Wilner

If fans are feeling dizzy, their heads spinning like they were jonesing on Lamar Jackson/Patrick Mahomes highlight videos, it’s understand­able.

All of the schedule juggling the NFL is doing feels like a Tilt-A-Whirl gone mad. Even worse, it’s almost certainly not over.

Super Bowl in springtime? Not out of the realm of possibilit­y.

The COVID-19 outbreak in Tennessee, followed by a mini-outbreak in New England, has forced all sorts of machinatio­ns. No team’s schedule through late November has been more disrupted than the Chargers — and they haven’t had a positive test.

Sure, the Titans seem to have some rescheduli­ng done daily by the league, and the Patriots don’t know when they will be able to practice at their facility again. Yet when the NFL on Sunday shuffled the schedule cards, it was the Chargers who came up with deuces.

Get this, the Chargers had four games and their bye impacted. Not only will fans have to check who is playing in the upcoming weeks, so will the players.

As if that’s not enough upheaval, consider that we are in Week 5. That means 12 more weeks on the schedule, ending on Jan. 3. Except that getting in all of the games by then likely is a pipe dream in a collision sport with so many participan­ts per team. Not to mention dozens of organizati­onal members who work at team facilities.

After several of his players turned to social media to complain about the uncertaint­y, Broncos coach Vic Fangio said he understood his players’ feelings.

“But my message to them and to anybody is we were inconvenie­nced by this, but it very easily could have been flipped around to where we had the positive tests and the Patriots were inconvenie­nced by it,” Fangio said. “So, I’m happy that the positive tests weren’t in our building. But I’m under no illusion that at some point we might have a positive test or two and be the cause of a game getting moved down the road.”

Whatever wiggle room the NFL had in compiling the schedule released in the spring pretty much is gone. Further outbreaks — or the continuanc­e of the ones in Nashville and Foxborough — will lead to more disturbanc­es. But given the nature of the sport and the inability to play games too close together on any regular basis, the league is now cornered.

There are solutions. They aren’t that different from what NHL and NBA, even golf and tennis have done: extend the schedule beyond the original calendar.

NFL executives have said they have myriad contingenc­y plans, which have to include regular-season games in January. How many? As many as are needed to get to 16 games — barring a total shutdown of the entire league.

How late into January? Whatever it takes to have everyone play 16 games.

It would mean pushing back the Super Bowl from Feb. 7 if more than one week in January is needed to complete the season.

There’s also the weather factor in so many cities. Then again, the NFL has been playing night games in Green Bay and New England and Kansas City during frigid months for years.

There are the broadcast partners to consider. It’s hard to imagine them complainin­g about more NFL content stretched further into the winter when pro football dominates the ratings — not only in sports, but overall.

While pushing the Super Bowl back in February might be an inconvenie­nce to organizers in Tampa, well, who’s to say the upcoming big game will have fans on hand, given how COVID-19 has affected the nation? It might very well be akin to the studio shows that so many NFL contests are right now.

As Dr. Allen Sills, the league’s medical director, has stated countless times: “We’ve said all along every option’s on the table. We’ve never taken any option off the table, which includes some type of pause or reset or any other type of alternativ­e arrangemen­ts.”

Stay tuned.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States