The Mercury News

Kaiser cited for failing virus precaution­s

Statewide citations expected for not acknowledg­ing airborne transmissi­on

- By Jackie Botts and Ana B. Ibarra CalMatters

California workplace safety officials issued a serious citation against a Kaiser Permanente psychiatri­c facility in Santa Clara, accusing the center of failing to provide workers with N95 masks and other protection against COVID-19. But the problems facing the health care giant may run much deeper.

The citation, issued Wednesday by the state’s Division of Occupation­al Safety and Health with a proposed fine of $11,200, is the first in an expected wave of citations against Kaiser Permanente facilities statewide for failing to acknowledg­e that COVID-19 can be transmitte­d via aerosol particles, according to a source inside Cal/OSHA, who asked not to be identified. Kaiser told CalMatters on Thursday that it plans to appeal.

The agency found that Kaiser systematic­ally failed to comply with California health and safety standards for aerosol transmissi­ble diseases, the source said, even after early studies showed that the virus could survive in the air. California instructed employers in May to assume that was the case, and most California hospitals complied. After a series of evolving statements, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidelines last week to say that COVID-19 transmissi­on can be, in fact, airborne.

Cal/OSHA’s citation thrusts the health care giant into the heart of a national battle over how hospitals and other health care employers should keep workers safe not only from virus particles that can hurl through the air in droplets from a sneeze or cough but also hover in the air after being exhaled by those infected. The nurses union welcomed California’s enforcemen­t action to protect front-line health workers.

“Cal/OSHA is operating at full enforcemen­t authority, and that makes our workplaces safer,” said Stephanie Roberson, government relations director with the California Nurses Associatio­n. Though she hasn’t seen the citation, the union filed a complaint

about the Santa Clara facility.

Health worker safety

Until this week, Cal/OSHA had closed 80 complaints about COVID-19 hazards in Kaiser Permanente hospitals and medical centers without issuing any citations. Many alleged that health care workers never were provided with N95 masks and other personal protective equipment. CalMatters obtained and reviewed the citation against the Santa Clara facility, which identified five violations of the state’s rules on aerosol transmissi­ble diseases, including failing to provide an adequate supply of N95 masks, allowing symptomati­c and asymptomat­ic employees to work alongside other employees and failing to quickly notify employees of exposure.

A Kaiser Permanente spokespers­on said the company disagrees with the state’s citation. Headquarte­red in Oakland, Kaiser is among the largest managed health care systems in the nation. The chain has received 28 citations across the state over the past five years, several of which it appealed.

In response to questions about the health system’s

COVID-19 precaution­s, Dr. Paul Thottingal, a national infectious disease leader at Kaiser Permanente, said that the health system does follow CDC’s droplet precaution­s guidelines and the state’s ATD standard when performing an aerosol-generating procedure. For example, staffers must wear N95 respirator­s and face shields when performing lung examinatio­ns, nebulizer treatments and intubation. He added that staff members working with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients also must wear the proper gear and treat them in isolated areas.

“This approach is in line with CDC guidance, recommenda­tions by the World Health Organizati­on and Cal/OSHA and is consistent with the practices of other health care providers in California and around the country,” Thottingal said.

The ATD standards, however, require that employers provide powered air-purifying respirator­s with HEPA filters, not N95 masks, to employees performing an aerosol-generating procedure.

Under the standards, employees working in the same area as suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases must have well-fitting N95 masks. Additional­ly, the employer must reserve isolation rooms for patients with the virus, provide employees

with training about aerosol transmissi­on and notify employees of potential unprotecte­d exposures.

The airborne debate

Earlier this month, the CDC recognized the airborne spread of the virus on its website, after taking it down just weeks before, adding to public confusion. Airborne transmissi­on happens when small respirator­y particles remain suspended in the air over long distances and time.

But even when the science behind the way the coronaviru­s spreads was murky, California treated it as airborne, said Kevin Riley, director of research and evaluation at UCLA’s Labor Occupation­al Safety and Health Program.

That got “effectivel­y drowned out by the CDC and local health department­s” de-emphasizin­g the risk of aerosol transmissi­on, said Riley, who has trained nurses across the state on the ATD standards during the pandemic.

Cal/OSHA issued clear guidance in May that COVID-19 is an airborne infectious disease that triggered additional precaution­s in health settings, including nursing homes, hospices, clinics and other medical facilities.

But acquiring N95 respirator­s has been an ongoing challenge during the pan

demic. Until recently, hospitals have said the supply chain continued to be spotty, and that it’s been difficult to acquire fitted respirator­s, especially for smaller faces.

The national shortage of medical supplies in the early months also drove the state to make questionab­le transactio­ns. In one notable example, the state wired half a billion dollars for masks to a three-day-old company, only to then pull back after bankers raised concerns.

“If we had an infinite amount of PPE, there would be no argument about this,” said Sen. Richard Pan, DSacrament­o, a pediatrici­an who chairs the Senate Health Committee. “But unfortunat­ely, we didn’t at the time, and even now, we have more, but not a huge amount.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed one of Pan’s bills requiring the state and health facilities to maintain a stockpile of protective gear, including respirator­s for a future pandemic or public health crisis.

The citations

On April 4, Cal/OSHA received a coronaviru­s-related complaint about the Santa Clara psych facility, federal records show. During an April 17 inspection, the agency found that the psychiatri­c facility had failed to implement a plan to protect

its mental health workers from the threat of coronaviru­s hanging in the air, didn’t provide an adequate supply of N95 masks, allowed “symptomati­c and asymptomat­ic employees to work” alongside other employees, and failed to quickly notify employees of exposure. The penalty: $9,000. The psychiatri­c facility racked up $2,200 in additional fines for failing to ensure that N95 respirator­s fit properly, train workerto-worker exposure, or notify employees of the time and date they were exposed to a positive case at work.

The penalties are relatively small compared with Cal/OSHA’s other COVID-19 citations. Some add up to around $200,000

for a single employer. Already, over a third of the employers slapped for COVID-19 hazards have appealed.

On April 4, Cal/OSHA received a coronaviru­s-related complaint about the Santa Clara psych facility, federal records show. At an April 17 inspection, the agency found the psychiatri­c facility had failed to implement a plan to protect its mental health workers from the threat of coronaviru­s hanging in the air, didn’t provide an adequate supply of N95 masks, allowed “symptomati­c and asymptomat­ic employees to work” alongside other employees and failed to quickly notify employees of exposure.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States