The Mercury News

Despite big spending, Prop. 22 down

Poll: Four California ballot measures failing to meet the levels of support needed to pass

- By Emily DeRuy ederuy@bayareanew­sgroup.com

“It’s relatively rare for an initiative to be picking up support in the last weeks of a campaign.”

— Political strategist Dan Schnur

Despite record spending from Uber and Lyft, a ballot measure that would allow the app-based companies to classify drivers as independen­t contractor­s is struggling with voters heading into the last week before Election Day.

According to the final preelectio­n poll from UC Berkeley’s Institute of Government­al Studies, support for Propositio­n 22 is growing, but remains shy of the 50% threshold it needs to pass. The survey shows three other ballot measures are likely headed for defeat: Propositio­n 15, which would change how commercial property taxes are calculated; Propositio­n 16, which would allow affirmativ­e action; and Propositio­n 21, which would allow cities to expand rent control.

The lackluster support comes even as the yes campaigns have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to convince voters the measures are worth passing. The battle over Prop. 22 has generated $220 million from proponents and opponents — more than any statewide measure ever. The yes campaign has drummed up the bulk of the money, with rideshare and food delivery giants like DoorDash kicking in more than $199 million.

The poll found that 46% of likely voters said they would vote yes on the measure, while 42% said they would vote no and 12% said they were undecided. In a sign that the blitz of ad spending is having at least some impact, a mid- September poll on the measure found only 39% of voters on the yes side and 36% in opposition, with a quarter undecided. Republican­s are more likely to support Prop. 22, while Democrats are more likely to reject it. And while voters in most regions of the state support

it, the poll shows the measure trailing by 20 points in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Still, the fact that the measure has picked up slightly more support than opposition in the last month is unusual, and could mean that convention­al wisdom — that a ballot measure needs to be well north of 50% support ahead of Election Day to succeed — may not hold in this case.

“It’s relatively rare for an initiative to be picking up support in the last weeks of a campaign,” said political strategist Dan Schnur. But “over the last month, the undecided vote has broken almost evenly for and against the initiative. If the supporters can keep up that trend, then they’ll pull this out by the skin of their teeth.”

And with a sizable funding advantage, the yes camp can continue to spend big money wooing undecided voters, while the opposition was forced to target their spending earlier, when mail-in ballots were arriving in voters’ mailboxes. Already, more than 7 million voters in the Golden State have returned their ballots.

“With just over a week left until the election, our internal tracking also shows growing support for Prop. 22,” Yes on 22 campaign spokesman Geoff Vetter said in a statement, declining to respond to a question about the campaign’s strategy in the final days of the race.

With Prop. 15, which would raise taxes on many businesses by assessing commercial property based on market value instead of purchase price, the poll found 49% of likely voters were in favor, which is unchanged from September. The poll found 42% were against it, and 9% remain undecided. In September, the yes side had a 15-point advantage, meaning convention­al wisdom may hold.

Because the yes dial hasn’t moved, “It’s going to be harder for them to get over 50%,” Schnur said.

The pollsters agreed, writing, “If history is any guide, when late campaign shifts toward the no side are observed in heavily contested and well-financed ballot measures like Prop. 15, its lead tends to reduce further in the closing weeks, resulting in a closer outcome.”

Supporters, including the California Teachers Associatio­n, have kicked in roughly $77 million to pass the propositio­n, which would direct more funding to schools, while business groups have raised $63 million to defeat it — a much more level playing field than on Prop. 22.

Democrats and liberal voters are more likely to favor the measure, along with renters, while Republican­s, conservati­ve voters and homeowners oppose it.

Echoing a recent poll from the Public Policy Institute of California, the IGS poll also finds Prop. 16, which would allow affirmativ­e action in public employment, education and contractin­g, trailing. Just 38% of likely voters say they support the idea, while 49% oppose it and 13% remain undecided.

W hi le Bla ck vot er s strongly support the measure, Latinx voters are divided and White and Asian American voters oppose it, the poll found.

“The absence of strong Latino support for Propositio­n 16 is surprising given that the community remains significan­tly underrepre­sented in higher education and public employment in California and would stand to benefit from the propositio­n’s passage,” IGS co- director Cristina Mora said in a statement.

Support for Prop. 21, which would let cities apply new rent control ordinances to homes built at least 15 years ago (with exemptions for single-family homes owned by landlords with two or fewer properties), remains the same as it was in September — with backing from 37% of likely voters. But opposition has ticked up, from 37% of likely voters to 48% as undecided voters have made up their minds. While 53% of Democrats support the idea, 83% of Republican­s reject it.

The survey of 5,352 likely voters was conducted in English and Spanish between Oct. 16-21 and has a sampling error of approximat­ely 2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States