The Mercury News

Many California Democrats cast votes like Republican­s

- By George Skelton George Skelton is a Los Angeles Times columnist. ©2020 Los Angeles Times. Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency.

California voters rejected an ambitious statewide ballot initiative to substantia­lly raise business property taxes. But they approved many local tax and bond measures. Why the distinctio­n?

One reason is that voters are suspicious of Sacramento politician­s. The public may not especially trust local officials either, but they’re closer and can be better watched and held accountabl­e.

Another reason is that voters this year are very anxious about the economy as the pandemic takes a toll on businesses, jobs and retirement savings. They didn’t want to unleash a major new property tax hike that might further cripple the California economy.

This is a deep-blue state with strong Democratic leanings. But on the landmark property tax proposal, Propositio­n 15, many Democrats voted like Republican­s. Democratic leaders and strategist­s apparently underestim­ated national surveys that showed there was one issue on which President Trump usually outpolled Joe Biden. It was on the question of which candidate would be best at handling the economy.

“People were incredibly nervous about their personal economic situations,” Democratic consultant Gale Kaufman says. “It’s really difficult to get people to spend money when they’re nervous about their own economic lot. … They didn’t want to screw up their 401(k)s.”

Another steep hurdle for Propositio­n 15 was that it asked voters to dramatical­ly change Propositio­n 13, the historic 1978 property tax cut that’s viewed by many as sacrosanct.

Residentia­l property would not have been affected, but many voters feared a camel’s nose under their tent. They suspected the tax-and-spenders would be coming after their homeowner tax breaks next.

Under Propositio­n 15, commercial property would have been reassessed at market value every three years. Currently, that reassessme­nt comes only when the property changes hands. And that’s almost never for big corporatio­ns using Propositio­n 13 loopholes.

Socking it to corporatio­ns is one thing. But a problem for Prop. 15 was that many small businesses lease their store sites and offices, and they would have been smacked. Under standard leases, the business owner is liable for the tax hikes.

The next time anti-13 forces launch an assault on the iconic law, they should focus narrowly on big corporatio­ns and be extra careful to exclude small businesses, even if the total tax take is smaller.

Propositio­n 15, sponsored by the California Teachers Associatio­n and the Service Employees Internatio­nal Union, would have raised up to $11.5 billion annually. The money would have been split 60% to local government­s and 40% to K-12 schools and community colleges.

Business interests spent roughly $72 million to defeat the initiative. Voters rejected it by roughly 52% to 48%.

But voters signed off on lots of local tax increases and bond issues. And under California’s stringent supermajor­ity rules, most local tax increases require a two-thirds vote because of Propositio­n 13. School bonds need 55%. Among proposed local sales tax increases, 53 were approved and nine rejected, according to an early report by the California Taxpayers Associatio­n. Several other measures were too close to call.

Of parcel tax proposals, 23 won and 13 lost. Forty school bond measures were approved, requiring property tax hikes. Only four were rejected, based on CalTax’s early look.

So why did these local measures pass — but Propositio­n 15 fail? There was an early warning sign.

In the March primary, a hefty $15 billion school constructi­on bond measure proposed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislatur­e was rejected by voters. It was the first defeat of a state school bond measure since 1994, a very Republican year.

“In local school districts, voters know what’s going on,” says Robert Gutierrez, president and chief executive of the California Taxpayers Associatio­n. “They understand what the money may or may not be used for. There’s a local connection to the community.”

That’s not the case with voters and Sacramento.

Propositio­n 15 was not placed on the ballot by the Legislatur­e and governor. It was labor’s doing. And the billions raised would not have flowed into the state treasury. The money would have gone to local government­s and schools. But it was strongly supported by Democratic leaders and the governor. The state’s brand was on the measure.

“Local government­s are more trusted,” says former Democratic consultant Darry Sragow, who publishes the California Target Book, which chronicles legislativ­e and congressio­nal races. “They feel that local officials are less likely to betray them.”

Voters sent Sacramento Democrats a message: Forget huge tax increases.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States