The Mercury News

Trump grants firms access to public lands

- By Eric Lipton

The Trump administra­tion is rushing to approve a final wave of large-scale mining and energy projects on federal lands, encouraged by investors who want to try to ensure the projects move ahead even after Presidente­lect Joe Biden takes office.

In Arizona, the Forest Service is preparing to sign off on the transfer of federal forest land — considered sacred by a neighborin­g Native American tribe — to allow constructi­on of one of the nation’s largest copper mines.

In Utah, the Interior Department may grant final approval as soon as this week to a team of energy speculator­s targeting a remote spot inside an iconic national wilderness area — where new energy leasing currently is banned — so they can start drilling into what they believe is a huge undergroun­d supply of helium.

In northern Nevada, the department is close to granting final approval to construct a sprawling openpit lithium mine on federal land that sits above a prehistori­c volcano site.

And in the East, the Forest Service intends to take a key step next month toward allowing a natural gas pipeline to be built through Jefferson National Forest in

Virginia and West Virginia, at one point running underneath the Appalachia­n Trail.

These projects, and others awaiting action in the remaining weeks of President Donald Trump’s administra­tion, reflect the intense push by the Interior Department, which controls 480 million acres of public lands, and the Forest Service, which manages another 193 million acres, to find ways to increase domestic energy and mining production, even in the face of intense protests by environmen­talists and other activists.

When he takes office Jan. 20, Biden, who has nominated a Native American — Rep. Deb Haaland, D-N.M. — to lead the Interior Department, still will be able to reshape, slow or even block certain projects.

Some, like the South Dakota uranium mine, will require further approvals, or face lawsuits seeking to stop them, like the planned helium drilling project in Utah. But others, like the lithium mine in Nevada, will have the final federal permit needed before constructi­on can begin and will be hard for the next administra­tion to stop.

Whether they are the final word or not, the lastminute actions are just the latest evidence of how the far-reaching shift in regulatory policy under Trump has altered the balance between environmen­tal concerns and business, giving substantia­l new weight to corporate interests.

Trump chose former industry executives to run major federal agencies like the Environmen­tal Protection Agency and the Interior Department, and industry executives and lobbyists who cycled in and out of government posts were granted substantia­l influence in setting regulation­s.

For four years, Trump’s team and its allies have raced to roll back federal rules intended to protect federal lands and the nation’s air and water as well as other safety rules in agencies across the government. The changes were often made in direct response to requests from lobbyists and company executives who were major donors to Trump and frequent patrons at his hotels and resorts.

The final push on the mining and energy projects has come in part from senior Trump administra­tion officials, including the commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, a steel industry investor before joining Trump’s Cabinet.

Ross’ calendar shows at least three appointmen­ts with top executives at Rio Tinto, the Australia-based mining giant backing the Resolution Copper mine planned for constructi­on in Arizona next to the San Carlos Apache reservatio­n. Ross also made a trip to the mine site this year.

“This is a disaster,” said Wendsler Nosie Sr., a former San Carlos Apache tribal leader who in recent weeks has been camping out at the proposed mine site inside Tonto National Forest to protest the pending decision.

Backers of these projects say they are committed to minimizing the effect on public lands, sacred Native American sites and wildlife.

“Our science-based decisions are legally compliant and based on an extensive process involving input from career subject matter experts and the public,” said Richard Packer, an Interior Department spokespers­on.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States