The Mercury News

Google puts a lid on cookie jar and ends an era of the internet

- By Timothy L. O’Brien Timothy L. O’Brien is a senior columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. © 2021 Bloomberg. Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency.

The cookie is dead. Long live the cookie.

Google, the internet search giant, said last week that it’s done tracking us as we skate around the web. It promises that after fully eliminatin­g its use of thirdparty cookies over the next year, it won’t adopt replacemen­ts that essentiall­y do the same thing.

That doesn’t mean Google won’t continue scooping up informatio­n it collects from users when they visit sites it controls. It also doesn’t mean that all of the machinery elsewhere that identifies the web’s denizens and serves them ads and other solicitati­ons tailored to their specific interests is going to evaporate.

But it does mean that a very particular and early chapter in the internet era is coming to an end. That era was defined by computer-based web browsers made potent by a number of innovation­s, with cookies being, perhaps, first among equals. Cookies allowed a browser to remember its users, making the web much easier to navigate. They also helped popularize and commercial­ize the web, ultimately spawning, alas, a universe in which personal privacy was easily compromise­d and the same ad for beautiful leather boots, pop-ups, notificati­ons and other flotsam clung to users wherever they went.

Lou Montulli, a computer programmer working for Netscape Communicat­ions Corp., invented cookies in 1994. He named them after “magic cookies” deployed by data scientists to perform routine computer operations, and his blog offers a justificat­ion.

Without cookies, “each time a user clicked to move to a different page they would become just another random user with no way to associate them with an action they had done just moments ago,” he writes. “This is a bit like talking to someone with Alzheimer’s disease. Each interactio­n would result in having to introduce yourself again, and again, and again.”

Netscape’s browser, available to anyone with a PC, was a sensation when it debuted, and it effectivel­y marked the beginning of the internet era.

Google emerged as a colossus in that world until the social media revolution turned Facebook into a viable competitor. Google and Facebook jointly inhaled nearly three-quarters of the $300 billion spent on web advertisin­g in 2020, according to the World Advertisin­g Research Council. Now, with regulators worldwide cracking down on Google, Facebook and other tech giants over privacy concerns and anticompet­itive behavior, the cookie has landed on the chopping block.

Technologi­cal change also fueled the cookie’s demise. Consumers have spent years flocking to mobile devices and apps, which don’t accommodat­e webbased cookie-tracking as effectivel­y as desktop computers once did. Apple’s Safari browser and Mozilla’s Firefox browser already have default settings that block third-party cookies, so Google will be playing catch-up by embracing more of the same on its Chrome browser. Still, it’s a seismic event when the company that blossomed because of cookie-driven advertisin­g revenue decides to call it quits.

Google also doesn’t appear to be worried that its business model is threatened. Marketers have been bracing for this moment for years and have already developed alternativ­es to cookies that will allow them to continue tracking how people journey around the web — albeit with less specifics about what each individual is up to across a multitude of sites. Google has already developed digital tools as part of a “privacy sandbox” that serves ads targeted at like-minded groups of people rather than individual­s.

As Bloomberg Intelligen­ce analysts have also noted, newfangled artificial intelligen­ce technologi­es and enhancemen­ts in machine learning are likely to continue to make ad targeting precise and lucrative. Companies that don’t embrace AI “risk extinction,” the analysts pointed out. So don’t expect Google to sit this one out. It has alternativ­es for delivering targeted ads, and instead of pursuing that lucre like a nefarious stalker, it’s likely to do so more anonymousl­y. And its first-party data, the informatio­n it still vacuums up when users employ its products, is likely to become more valuable as third-party data sources shrivel.

“People shouldn’t have to accept being tracked across the web in order to get the benefits of relevant advertisin­g,” wrote David Temkin, a Google executive, when his company announced it would find alternativ­es to digital ankle bracelets. “And advertiser­s don’t need to track individual consumers across the web to get the performanc­e benefits of digital advertisin­g. ”So the way users are tracked will change, but it’s not clear how much of a say, if any, individual­s will have about controllin­g all of that.

The cookie is dead. Long live the cookie.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States