The Mercury News

U.S. health officials question AstraZenec­a vaccine trial results

- By Rebecca Robbins, Noah Weiland, Sharon LaFraniere and Benjamin Mueller

Only hours after AstraZenec­a announced encouragin­g news about the effectiven­ess of its COVID-19 vaccine Monday, a group of medical experts charged with monitoring the company’s clinical trial made a highly unusual accusation: AstraZenec­a had essentiall­y cherry-picked data to make its vaccine look better.

The accusation, in a two-page letter sent Monday to the company and federal officials, was a fresh blow to the credibilit­y of a vaccine whose low price and relatively easy storage have made it critical to the global fight against the coronaviru­s pandemic.

The private letter, which was described by people who have read it, castigated AstraZenec­a for jeopardizi­ng the integrity of a closely watched clinical trial.

“Decisions like this are what erode public trust in the scientific process,” the oversight board wrote.

The letter prompted the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to issue a sharply worded statement Tuesday shortly after midnight, disclosing the panel’s concerns.

The fight is about the degree of effectiven­ess of a vaccine that is undisputab­ly effective.

While AstraZenec­a said Monday that its vaccine appeared to be 79% effective at preventing COVID-19, the panel of independen­t experts said the actual number may have been between 69% and 74%. The mass availabili­ty of a vaccine with even a 69% efficacy rate could help the world conquer the coronaviru­s.

Fears that the vaccine might trigger rare but serious side effects had led more than a dozen countries, mostly in Europe, to temporaril­y suspend the use of the shot. European regulators last week affirmed the vaccine’s safety. The results from the U.S. trial Monday — providing the cleanest, most complete picture of the vaccine’s efficacy — seemed to validate the vaccine’s and made it look more effective than in earlier trials.

In short, it bolstered the credibilit­y of arguably the world’s most important vaccine, one that has been authorized for use in more than 70 countries. But the overnight announceme­nt from the institute immediatel­y raised a new set of questions about it and AstraZenec­a.

“If they keep making these unforced errors, then that’s going to derail confidence, and that will really affect our ability to combat this pandemic,” said Dr. Peter J. Hotez, a vaccine expert at the Baylor College of Medicine.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? More questions are raised in a letter by medical experts about the data gained from the clinical trials for the AstraZenec­a COVID-19vaccine.
GETTY IMAGES More questions are raised in a letter by medical experts about the data gained from the clinical trials for the AstraZenec­a COVID-19vaccine.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States