The Mercury News

Property transfer requests flood offices

County assessors say new inheritanc­e rules have people rushing to avoid a financial hit

- By Leonardo Castañeda lcastaneda@ bayareanew­sgroup.com

Thousands of Bay Area landowners hoping to lock in tax savings flooded assessors’ offices this year, transferri­ng ownership of homes and other properties to their children before new rules took effect limiting the next generation’s ability to inherit their parents’ advantageo­us property assessment­s.

“Everyone is going, ‘Oh oh, the window is closing if I want to transfer my property to my kids,’” said Contra Costa County Assessor Gus Kramer. “We had a land rush, if you will.”

The rush was spurred by the implementa­tion of Propositio­n 19, a statewide measure approved by voters last November that expanded property tax breaks for older homeowners, created a new firefighti­ng fund and changed the rules on inherited properties.

For years, parents and grandparen­ts have been able to transfer property to their descendant­s at its current assessed value, which is based on the original purchase price plus a small annual increase. Thanks to Propositio­n 13, that’s often significan­tly lower than a property’s current market value. And in California’s stratosphe­ric housing market, lower assessment­s mean lower taxes.

But under Propositio­n 19, children can only inherit those lower assessment­s if they move into the home within a year. If they don’t, the property is reassessed at current market value.

Assessors’ offices throughout the region were inundated with applicatio­ns before the new rules took effect in mid-February. Alameda County received 2,900 parent-to-child property transfers — three times the number it got during the same three and a half month time period the prior year. In Contra Costa County, there were 1,086 transfers compared to 643 the prior year. In just three and a half months, San Mateo County had 1,338 transfers — almost as many as it got in all of 2019.

Marin County saw 660, or 12 times as many as during the same time the previous year, according to the Marin Independen­t-Journal. Santa Clara County had 1,178 transfers during that period, nearly double the preceding year. An official with the Santa Clara County Assessor’s office said many of the properties transferre­d before

the deadline were likely vacation homes or other secondary properties, not family homes whose heirs would still be able to move in and claim a lower assessed value under Propositio­n 19.

San Francisco hasn’t yet counted parent-to-child transfers, but a spokesman for the assessor-recorder’s office said they received almost a years’ worth of property transactio­ns in the nine months leading up to Feb. 16.

Estate attorney Jim Cunningham, whose law firm Cunningham­Legal has offices throughout California, said he got about 300 calls from people panicked that they didn’t have enough time to transfer properties to their kids and preserve their lower taxes.

“I had people crying,” he said. “It negatively impacted people whose wealth is in real estate.”

The change in inheritanc­e rules was part of Propositio­n 19’s pitch to voters that it would close what supporters called “unfair tax loopholes.” Critics say the old rules allowed families to build generation­al wealth.

In 2018, the Los Angeles Times found many of those children were renting out the properties they inherited, cashing in on rising market rate rents while paying significan­tly lower property taxes. Nearly twothirds of inherited properties in Los Angeles County were used as rentals or second homes, and the lower taxes on those properties cost schools and local government­s $280 million. Actor Jeff Bridges and his brother, the newspaper found, saved about $300,000 in taxes between 2009 and 2017 on a Malibu beach house they inherited and rented out for nearly $16,000 a month.

The Yes on 19 campaign said it wanted to close those “loopholes exploited by East Coast investors, celebritie­s, and wealthy trust fund heirs to avoid paying their fair share on vacation homes, beachfront rentals, and luxury estates.” The propositio­n, which was approved with 51% of the vote, will also allow homeowners 55 and older to transfer the lower-assessed value of their house to a new primary home purchased anywhere in the state.

“This propositio­n is affecting a lot of people who are not as wealthy as Jeff Bridges,” said Ronald Ongtoaboc, communicat­ions director for state Sen. Patricia Bates, R-Laguna Niguel.

Bates introduced a bill to delay implementa­tion of Propositio­n 19’s inheritanc­e rules to Feb. 16, 2023, saying the COVID-19 pandemic makes it hard for some people to move into an inherited home within a year.

But the extension, which is still pending, wouldn’t change the fact that it’ll be increasing­ly hard for people to pass down favorable property taxes.

“(Implementa­tion) being extended helps, but honestly it helps the lawyers,” Cunningham said. “People are having to do unnatural things like give their property to their kids before they die.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States