The Mercury News

Corporate pledges falling flat 6 months after Capitol assault

- By David Klepper

PROVIDENCE, R.I. >> As shockwaves spread across the country from the Jan. 6 insurrecti­on at the U.S. Capitol, corporate America took a stand against the lies that powered the mob. Or so it seemed.

Dozens of big companies, citing their commitment to democracy, pledged to avoid donating money to the 147 lawmakers who objected to Congress’ certificat­ion of Joe Biden’s victory on the false grounds that voting fraud stole the election from thenPresid­ent Donald Trump.

It was a striking gesture by some of the most familiar names in business but, as it turns out, it was largely an empty one.

Six months later, many of those companies have resumed funneling cash to political action committees that benefit the election efforts of lawmakers whether they objected to the election certificat­ion or not. When it comes to seeking political influence through corporate giving, business as usual is back, if it ever left.

Walmart, Pfizer, Intel, General Electric and AT&T are among companies that announced their pledges on behalf of democracy in the days after Trump supporters stormed the Capitol in a violent bid to disrupt the transfer of power.

The companies contend that donating directly to a candidate is not the same as giving to a PAC that supports them. Given America’s porous campaign finance laws, that’s a distinctio­n without a difference to campaign finance experts.

The companies’ argument also glosses over the fact that, in large measure, they did their giving through PACs before their pledge, rather than to individual­s, so in many cases nothing changed.

“Pledging not to give to a certain person doesn’t mean that much when there are so many other ways that corporate money reaches elected officials,” said Daniel Weiner, a former senior counsel at the Federal Election Commission who now works at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s law school. “These pledges are largely symbolic.”

Walmart’s moral stand lasted three months. In January, the retail giant said it would suspend all donations to the 147 lawmakers who objected to the election results. But in April, the company gave $30,000 to the National Republican Congressio­nal Committee, the party organizati­on that supports House Republican­s in elections.

Two-thirds of those House members voted against certifying Biden’s win.

Walmart gave an additional $30,000 to the House committee’s counterpar­t for Senate Republican­s, the National Republican Senatorial Committee. That group is led by an objector to the election’s certificat­ion, Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, who stands to benefit from the contributi­on along with seven other GOP senators who also sought to overturn the will of voters.

In January, after the attack, General Electric said it would “halt donations to lawmakers who voted against certificat­ion.”

In April, General Electric gave $15,000 each to the House and Senate GOP election groups.

Likewise, Pfizer pledged to suspend contributi­ons to Republican objectors for six months. But after only three months, it gave $20,000 to the GOP’s Senate group. Pfizer spokeswoma­n Sharon Castillo told the AP that the company drew a distinctio­n between giving money to individual lawmakers and to groups created to help those same lawmakers. “We just don’t think it is an accurate connection,” she said.

 ?? JIM LO SCALZO — POOL VIA AP ?? Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi speaks in the House Chamber on Jan. 6 after it reconvened for arguments over the objection of certifying Arizona’s Electoral College votes.
JIM LO SCALZO — POOL VIA AP Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi speaks in the House Chamber on Jan. 6 after it reconvened for arguments over the objection of certifying Arizona’s Electoral College votes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States