The Mercury News

Home wealth surges while virus rages on

For those who can afford to own, soaring values push up equity

- By Louis Hansen lhansen@bayareanew­sgroup.com

High-flying and fast-climbing prices, crazy bidding wars — is the Bay Area housing market starting to feel like a bubble?

Forget it, this isn’t the Great Recession of 2008.

Homeowner equity in the Bay Area has soared during the COVID-19 pandemic, with San Mateo and Santa Clara counties having the highest percentage of equity-rich households in the United States, according to an analysis of mortgages and home values by real estate analytics firm Attom. Equity is the difference between what a homeowner owes on a house and what a house is worth.

More than 7 in 10 homeowners in the two counties have more than 50% equity in their properties, a substantia­l rise in personal wealth even as high unemployme­nt and economic suffering continues in other parts of

the community.

“Equity levels at both ends of the spectrum improved in the Bay Area, as they did throughout the country. That’s mainly because most homeowners were still able to pay their mortgages at a time of rising home values,” Attom executive Todd Teta said. “Even those who lost their jobs and couldn’t keep up with loan payments saw equity get better simply because home values kept increasing.”

Median home prices in the Bay Area during the pandemic mirrored the national trend — they soared. Local home prices rose from $1.01 million in March 2020 to $1.35 million in June, a 34% gain.

Five Bay Area counties were among the top eight equity-rich places in the United States. Equity rich, according to Attom, means the estimated loans on the property do not exceed 50% of its value.

All Bay Area counties except San Francisco saw gains in households reaching an equity-rich threshold between March 2020 and June 2021. Contra Costa, once seen as a more affordable suburban community, had the biggest jump, from 43% to 57%. Alameda grew from 58% to 66%, Santa Clara 66% to 70%, Marin 52% to 64%, and San Mateo 72% to 74%.

In the entire nine-county region, the percentage of equity-rich properties went from 57% at the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak to 64% in June, nearly double the U.S. average of 34%, according to the analysis.

As expected, hardly any Bay Area borrowers (just 1.2%) are seriously overlevera­ged on their mortgage payments. The low rate of underwater properties makes it highly unlikely the region would see a wave of mortgage failures similar to the home loan crisis that began in 2007.

But the tech-rich Bay Area, holding some of the highest home prices in the United States, was just on par with the rest of the country’s homeowners in gaining equity. Teta said gains in the San Jose and San Francisco metros were in the middle of the pack of the 106 metro areas analyzed by Attom.

“The bottom line is that most homeowners could have not paid a dime more on their mortgages and still would have seen equity grow,” he said in an email. “As most were probably still able to pay down their mortgages, the typical Bay Area homeowner had more equity in the second quarter of this year compared to last year.”

Personal wealth tied up in Bay Area homes has created financial security for many families and given homeowners many options for tapping those assets. But housing and equality advocates say the analysis also highlights the growing disparitie­s in wealth accumulati­on between homeowners and renters in the region.

Many tech workers have been able to make it big in Silicon Valley, said Megan Abell of TechEquity, but “that’s not the full picture of what’s happening.”

High Bay Area housing costs and historic discrimina­tion have meant communitie­s of color have been shut out of homeowners­hip or wait longer to buy, she said. “It’s the predominan­t way that we build wealth in this country,” said Abell, director of advocacy for the nonprofit.

Vince Rocha of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group said the rising home values point to the need for inventive ways to build more middle-class housing. Opening up additional residentia­l property for multifamil­y housing like duplexes would allow more families to put down roots and build wealth from homeowners­hip. Roughly 80% of residentia­l land in the Bay Area is zoned exclusivel­y for single-family homes, according to a recent UC Berkeley study.

“You can’t have a healthy economy, for example, if the teachers, firefighte­rs and service workers can’t afford to live here,” said Rocha, senior director of housing and community developmen­t for the business lobby.

Real estate experts also say the swelling values of Bay Area homes have made owners rethink things.

San Jose agent Dave Walsh, president of the California Associatio­n of Realtors, said he’s never seen a higher level of seller satisfacti­on. Santa Clara County homes in June sold for about a 10% premium over listing prices, more than double the typical rate, he said.

“A lot of sellers are reconsider­ing their lifestyles,” Walsh said. Bay Area homeowners are asking, “Do I really need to live in the Bay Area? Can I move to Lake Tahoe? The Sacramento area?”

But Walsh cautioned the rising equity and home values are a double-edged sword. Renters have often borne the brunt of the economic damage in the pandemic. “It’s the haves and have-nots,” Walsh said, “again.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States