The Mercury News

Companies have vaccine questions

Trade group asks for ‘immediate clarity’ about mandates

- By Lauren Hirsch

A trade group representi­ng some 2,000 consumer brands sent a letter to President Joe Biden on Monday asking for clarificat­ion about his announceme­nt last week that all companies with more than 100 employees will soon need to require vaccinatio­n or weekly testing.

Biden said last week that the Department of Labor and its Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion would draft the rules, which would affect some 80 million workers.

But the mandate has raised vexing issues for employers as they deal with the practicali­ties of vaccinatio­n policies, said Geoff Freeman, president of the trade group, the Consumer Brands Associatio­n.

On Monday, Freeman called on Biden to “create immediate clarity” about how private businesses should carry out aspects of the White House’s plan to achieve “our shared goal of increased vaccinatio­n rates.”

He shared 19 questions that represente­d a “small sampling” of those raised by the trade group’s members. Among them:

• What proof-of-vaccinatio­n documentat­ion will the companies need to collect and will booster shots also be required?

• Must employees be fully vaccinated?

• Will workers who have had the coronaviru­s still have to be vaccinated or get tested?

• Will the requiremen­ts apply only to vaccines that are fully approved by the Food and Drug Administra­tion? (The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is currently the only shot with full approval.)

• Who is responsibl­e for vaccinatio­n tracking — the government or the individual businesses?

• What are the consequenc­es of falsifying a vaccinatio­n status?

Other questions, on testing and other policy details, covered similar ground, touching on how federal guidelines interact with state-level initiative­s, who will be responsibl­e for paying for testing and whether waivers would be allowed if employee absences or attrition resulted in supply chain disruption­s.

Also of concern, Freeman said in an interview, is the slow pace at which government tends to move, compared with the quick decisions that private businesses are used to making. This has been a problem during the pandemic, he said.

“For 19 months, we’ve been working with either the Trump administra­tion or the Biden administra­tion

and all of the agencies involved in this,” he said. “And the simple truth is that they have been slow to keep up with the pace of change.”

He added, “All of us want to get to the other side of this thing as quickly as possible. It’s not going to work in this scenario unless an entity like OSHA can move at the pace of the business environmen­t.”

Major business trade groups have generally been supportive of the mandate, which gives otherwise wary businesses the cover to require

inoculatio­n.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobbying group, has said that it “will work to ensure that employers have the resources, guidance and flexibilit­y necessary to ensure the safety of their employees and customers and comply with public health requiremen­ts.” Another major business advocacy group, the Business Roundtable, has said it “welcomes” the Biden administra­tion’s actions.

But they have also been

racing to understand the details and implicatio­ns, which can vary depending on a company’s size. Does a company’s worker count include part-time employees? What is the deadline for compliance? Will potential lawsuits slow the process down?

The White House has said it will provide more guidance by Sept. 24.

At this point, “there are more questions than answers,” said Ian Schaefer, a partner at the law firm Loeb & Loeb who specialize­s in

labor issues.

Even as companies are calling their lobbyists and lawyers for more insight, many are discussing at a senior level the realities of putting a mandate in place, despite not yet knowing exactly what that might entail, he said.

“In the absence of actionable intelligen­ce that gives a little bit more guidance and direction, I think they’re sort of controllin­g for what they can control, which is a lot of internal politics at this point,” Schaefer said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States