The Mercury News

Biden lifts abortion referral ban on family planning clinics

- By Ricardo AlonsoZald­ivar

WASHINGTON >> The Biden administra­tion on Monday reversed a ban on abortion referrals by family planning clinics, lifting a Trump-era restrictio­n as political and legal battles over abortion grow sharper from Texas to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Department of Health and Human Services said its new regulation will restore the federal family planning program to the way it ran under the Obama administra­tion, when clinics were able to refer women seeking abortions to a provider. The goal is to “strengthen and restore” services, said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra.

Groups representi­ng the clinics said they hope the Biden administra­tion action will lead some 1,300 local facilities that left in protest over Trump’s policies to return, helping to stabilize a longstandi­ng program shaken by the coronaviru­s pandemic on top of ideologica­l battles.

“I have heard that almost everywhere in the country people have made the decision that conditions will be good for them to return to the program,” Clare Coleman, president of the umbrella group National Family

Planning & Reproducti­ve Health Associatio­n, said in an interview. “My sense is that people have been waiting for the rule.”

Planned Parenthood, the biggest service provider, said on Twitter its health centers look forward to returning. But the group criticized part of the Biden administra­tion rule that allows individual clinicians who object to abortion not to provide referrals. The administra­tion said that’s “in accordance with applicable federal law.”

Known as Title X, the taxpayer-funded program makes available more than $250 million a year to clinics to provide birth control and basic health care services mainly to low-income women, many of them from minority communitie­s. Under

former President Donald Trump, clinics were barred from referring patients for abortions, prompting a mass exit by service providers affiliated with Planned Parenthood, as well as several states and other independen­t organizati­ons.

Women’s groups labeled the Trump policy a “gag rule,” and medical organizati­ons called it a violation of the clinician-patient relationsh­ip. But religious and social conservati­ves praised the policy for imposing a strict separation between family planning services and abortion. Under federal law, clinics could not use federal money to pay for abortions.

In 2018, the family planning clinics served about 3.9 million clients, but HHS estimates that number fell by nearly 40% after the Trump policy. The upheaval may have led to more than 180,000 unintended pregnancie­s, the agency said. In all, more than onequarter of the clinics left the program. Although several states stepped up with their own no-strings-attached funding, women in some parts of the country still lost access.

Combined with service disruption­s due to COVID-19 shutdowns, “this has just been a massive one-two punch to the system,” said Coleman.

Biden campaigned on a promise to overturn the restrictio­ns on family planning clinics, but abortion was not a central issue in the 2020 presidenti­al race. It may become one in the 2022 midterm elections to determine who controls Congress.

Restrictiv­e state laws in Texas, Mississipp­i and elsewhere have prompted a mobilizati­on by abortion rights supporters, who fear a conservati­ve-leaning Supreme Court will overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationally. Hundreds of abortion-themed protests were held around the country Saturday, including one that brought thousands of abortion rights supporters to the steps of the court.

 ?? JOSE LUIS MAGANA — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Thousands of demonstrat­ors march outside the U.S. Supreme Court during the Women’s March in Washington on Saturday.
JOSE LUIS MAGANA — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Thousands of demonstrat­ors march outside the U.S. Supreme Court during the Women’s March in Washington on Saturday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States