The Mercury News

Sunday’s parliament­ary vote is marred by boycott, voter apathy

- By Qassim Abdul-Zahra

BAGHDAD >> Iraqis voted Sunday in parliament­ary elections held months ahead of schedule as a concession to a youth-led popular uprising against corruption and mismanagem­ent.

But the voting was marked by widespread apathy and a boycott by many of the young activists who thronged the streets of Baghdad and Iraq’s south- ern provinces in late 2019. Tens of thousands of people took part in the mass protests and were met by security forces firing live ammunition and tear gas.

More than 600 people were killed and thousands injured within just a few months.

Although authoritie­s gave in and called the early elections, the death toll and the heavy-handed crackdown — as well as a string of targeted assassinat­ions — prompted many who took part in the protests to later call for a boycott of the vote.

Polls closed following 11 hours of voting. Results are expected within the next 24 hours, according to the independen­t body that oversees Iraq’s election. But negotiatio­ns to choose a prime minister tasked with forming a government are expected to drag on for weeks or even months.

The election was the sixth held since the fall of Saddam Hussein after the U.S.led invasion of Iraq in 2003. Many were skeptical that independen­t candidates from the protest movement stood a chance against well-entrenched parties and politician­s, many of them backed by powerful armed militias.

Minutes after polls closed, fireworks organized by Baghdad’s municipali­ty went off in the city’s landmark Tahrir Square, where demonstrat­ors had set up tents for several months starting in October 2019. The protests fizzled out by February of the following year, due to the security crackdown and later, the coronaviru­s pandemic.

Today, the square stands largely empty. The country faces huge economic and security challenges, and although most Iraqis long for change, few expect it to happen as a result of the elections.

Muna Hussein, a 22-yearold cinematic makeup artist, said she boycotted the election because she did not feel there was a safe environmen­t “with uncontroll­ed weapons everywhere,” a reference to the mainly Shiite militias backed by neighborin­g Iran.

“In my opinion, it isn’t easy to hold free and fair elections under the current circumstan­ces,” she said.

Amir Fadel, a 22-yearold car dealer, disagreed. “I don’t want these same faces and same parties to return,” he said after casting his ballot in Baghdad’s Karradah district.

Iraq’s Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, whose chances for a second term will be determined by the results of the election, urged Iraqis to vote in large numbers.

“Get out and vote, and change your future,” said al-Kadhimi, repeating the phrase, “get out” three times after casting his ballot at a school in Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone, home to foreign embassies and government offices.

Under Iraq’s laws, the winner of Sunday’s vote gets to choose the country’s next prime minister, but it’s unlikely any of the competing coalitions can secure a clear majority. That will require a lengthy process involving backroom negotiatio­ns to select a consensus prime minister and agree on a new coalition government. It took eight months of political wrangling to form a government after the 2018 elections.

Groups drawn from Iraq’s majority Shiite Muslims dominate the electoral landscape, with a tight race expected between Iraq’s influentia­l Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, and the Fatah Alliance, led by paramilita­ry leader Hadi al-Ameri, which came in second in the previous election.

The Fatah Alliance is comprised of parties and affiliated with the Popular Mobilizati­on Forces, an umbrella group of mostly proIran Shiite militias that rose to prominence during the war against the Sunni extremist Islamic State group.

It includes some of the most hard-line Iran-backed factions, such as the Asaib Ahl al-Haq militia.

Al-Sadr, a black-turbaned nationalis­t leader, is also close to Iran, but publicly rejects its political influence.

Earlier Sunday, al-Sadr cast his ballot in the Shiite holy city of Najaf, swarmed by local journalist­s.

He then drove away in a white sedan without commenting. Al-Sadr, a populist who has an immense following among Iraq’s working class Shiites, came out on top in the 2018 elections, winning a majority of seats.

The election is the first since the fall of Saddam to proceed without a curfew in place, reflecting the significan­tly improved security situation in the country following the defeat of IS in 2017. Previous votes were marred by fighting and deadly bomb attacks that have plagued the country for decades.

More than 250,000 security personnel across the country were tasked with protecting the vote. Soldiers, police and anti-terrorism forces fanned out and deployed outside polling stations, some of which were ringed by barbed wire. Voters were patted down and searched.

As a security precaution, Iraq closed its airspace and land border crossings and scrambled its air force from Saturday night until early this morning.

In another first, Sunday’s election is taking place under a new election law that divides Iraq into smaller constituen­cies — another demand of the activists who took part in the 2019 protests — and allows for more independen­t candidates.

The 2018 elections saw just 44% of eligible voters cast their ballots, a record low, and the results were widely contested. There are concerns of a similar or even lower turnout this time.

 ?? NABIL AL-JURANI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? People cast their votes during the parliament­ary elections in Basra, Iraq, Sunday.
NABIL AL-JURANI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS People cast their votes during the parliament­ary elections in Basra, Iraq, Sunday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States